Analytical framework and tool kit for SEA follow-up

Journal Article · Wed Apr 15 04:00:00 EDT 2009 · Environmental Impact Assessment Review

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2008.09.002· OSTI ID:21180421

Nilsson, Mans ^[1]; Wiklund, Hans ^[2]; Finnveden, Goeran; Jonsson, Daniel K ^[3]; Lundberg, Kristina ^[4]; Tyskeng, Sara ^[3]; Wallgren, Oskar ^[1]

---

1. Stockholm Environment Institute (SEI), Kraeftriket 2B, SE 10691 Stockholm (Sweden)
2. Joenkoeping International Business School, Department of Political Science, PO Box 1036, SE 551 11 Joenkoeping (Sweden)
3. Royal Institute of Technology, Division of Environmental Strategies Research, Department of Urban Planning and Environment, SE 100 44 Stockholm (Sweden)
4. Royal Institute of Technology, Land and Water Resources Engineering, SE 100 44 Stockholm (Sweden)

Most Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) research and applications have so far neglected the ex post stages of the process, also called SEA follow-up. Tool kits and methodological frameworks for engaging effectively with SEA follow-up have been conspicuously missing. In particular, little has so far been learned from the much more mature evaluation literature although many aspects are similar. This paper provides an analytical framework and tool kit for SEA follow-up. It is based on insights and tools developed within programme evaluation and environmental systems analysis. It is also grounded in empirical studies into real planning and programming practices at the regional level, but should have relevance for SEA processes at all levels. The purpose of the framework is to promote a learning-oriented and integrated use of SEA follow-up in strategic decision making. It helps to identify appropriate tools and their use in the process, and to systematise the use of available data and knowledge across the planning organization and process. It distinguishes three stages in follow-up: scoping, analysis and learning, identifies the key functions and demonstrates the informational linkages to the strategic decision-making process. The associated tool kit includes specific analytical and deliberative tools. Many of these are applicable also ex ante, but are then used in a predictive mode rather than on the basis of real data. The analytical element of the framework is organized on the basis of programme theory and 'DPSIR' tools. The paper discusses three issues in the application of the framework: understanding the integration of organizations and knowledge; understanding planners' questions and analytical requirements; and understanding interests, incentives and reluctance to evaluate.

• OSTI ID: 21180421
• Journal Information: Environmental Impact Assessment Review, Journal Name: Environmental Impact Assessment Review Journal Issue: 3 Vol. 29; ISSN 0195-9255; ISSN EIARDK
• Country of Publication: United States
• Language: English

Related Subjects

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
DECISION MAKING
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENTS
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
EVALUATION
LEARNING
PLANNING
SYSTEMS ANALYSIS