Skip to main content
U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

The Role of N-Acetylcysteine in the Prevention of Contrast-Induced Nephrotoxicity

Journal Article · · Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology
 [1];  [2];  [3]
  1. Guy's and St. Thomas's Hospital, Department of Radiology (United Kingdom)
  2. St. George's Hospital, Department of Radiology (United Kingdom)
  3. St. George's Hospital, Department of Renal Medicine (United Kingdom)

Purpose. To determine the role of prophylactic N-acetylcysteine in the prevention of contrast-induced nephrotoxicity. Methods. One hundred and sixteen patients undergoing noncoronary angiography, with or without pre-existing renal impairment, were randomly assigned to receive prophylactic oral N-acetylcysteine or no treatment. Serum creatinine (sCr) was measured prior to angiography and 48 hr after the procedure. Urine samples were collected before and after the examination for measurement of malondialdehyde (MDA) concentration. Contrast-induced nephrotoxicity (CIN) was defined as a rise in serum creatinine of 0.5 mg/dl (44 mmol/l) at 48 hr. Results. Complete data were available on 106 patients, 53 of whom had received N-acetylcysteine. There were no significant differences between the two groups in baseline characteristics, type of angiogram, or volume and concentration of contrast used. Three patients (2.8%), all of whom had received N-acetylcysteine, developed CIN. In the N-acetylcysteine group, the mean serum creatinine in patients with renal impairment was 151.0 {+-} 44.2 {mu}mol/l prior to the procedure and 155.6 {+-} 48.6 {mu}mol/l (p = 0.49) after the procedure. Respective values for those without renal impairment were 79.6 {+-} 15.1 {mu}mol/l and 81.2 {+-} 20.0 {mu}mol/l (p = 0.65). In the group that had not received N-acetylcysteine, the mean serum creatinine levels before and after the procedure were 150.0 {+-} 58.1 and 141.4 {+-} 48.0 {mu}mol/l (p = 0.17) in patients with renal impairment and 79.7 {+-} 14.2 and 81.4 {+-} 15.4 {mu}mol/l (p = 0.34) in those without renal impairment. In both groups, no significant change in urinary MDA concentration was observed. Conclusion. There is no benefit to the prophylactic administration of N-acetylcysteine in patients undergoing peripheral angiography using current contrast media.

OSTI ID:
21091228
Journal Information:
Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology, Journal Name: Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology Journal Issue: 3 Vol. 29; ISSN 0174-1551; ISSN CAIRDG
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

Similar Records

Reducing the Risks for Contrast-Induced Nephropathy
Journal Article · Wed Dec 14 23:00:00 EST 2005 · Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology · OSTI ID:21088111

Renal angiography with iohexol and metrizoate
Journal Article · Tue Jan 31 23:00:00 EST 1984 · Radiology; (United States) · OSTI ID:5234095

The Clinical Epidemiology of Contrast-Induced Nephropathy
Journal Article · Wed Dec 14 23:00:00 EST 2005 · Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology · OSTI ID:21088112