skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Percutaneous CT-Guided Biopsy of the Lung: Comparison Between Aspiration and Automated Cutting Needles Using a Coaxial Technique

Journal Article · · Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/S002700010067· OSTI ID:21083629
;  [1];  [2];  [3]
  1. Imagerie Medicale Radiologie Diagnostique et Therapeutique, Hopital Haut-Leveque, Universite de Bordeaux 2, Avenue de Magellan, F-33604 Pessac (France)
  2. Anatomie pathologique, Hopital Haut-Leveque, Universite de Bordeaux 2, Avenue de Magellan, F-33604 Pessac (France)
  3. Informatique et Biostatistique, Hopital Haut-Leveque, Avenue de Magellan, F-33604 Pessac (France)

Purpose: To compare the accuracy and complication rate of two different CT-guided transthoracic needle biopsy techniques: fine needle aspiration and an automated biopsy device.Methods: Two consecutive series of respectively 125 (group A) and 98 (group B) biopsies performed using 20-22 gauge coaxial fine needle aspiration (group A) and an automated 19.5 gauge coaxial biopsy device (group B) were compared in terms of their accuracy and complication rate.Results: Groups A and B included respectively 100 (80%) and 77 (79%) malignant lesions and 25 (20%) and 18 (21%) benign lesions. No significant difference was found between the two series concerning patients, lesions, and procedural variables. For a diagnosis of malignancy, a statistically significant difference in sensitivity was found (82.7% vs 97.4%) between results obtained with the automated biopsy device and fine needle aspiration respectively. For a diagnosis of malignancy, the false negative rate of the biopsy result was significantly higher (p <0.005) in group A (17%) than in group B (2.6%). For a specific diagnosis of benignity, no statistically significant difference was found between the two groups (44% vs 26%) but the automated biopsy device provided fewer indeterminate cases. There was no difference between the two groups concerning the pneumothorax rate, which was 20% in group A and 15% in group B, or the hemoptysis rate, which was 2.4% in group A and 4% in group B.Conclusion: For a diagnosis of malignancy when a cytopathologist is not available on-site, automated biopsy devices provide a lower rate of false negative results and a similar complication rate to fine needle aspiration.

OSTI ID:
21083629
Journal Information:
Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology, Vol. 23, Issue 4; Other Information: DOI: 10.1007/s002700010067; Copyright (c) 2000 Springer-Verlag New York Inc; Country of input: International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA); ISSN 0174-1551
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

Similar Records

Diagnostic Accuracy of MRI-guided Percutaneous Transthoracic Needle Biopsy of Solitary Pulmonary Nodules
Journal Article · Wed Apr 15 00:00:00 EDT 2015 · Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology · OSTI ID:21083629

Out-of-Plane Computed-Tomography-Guided Biopsy Using a Magnetic-Field-Based Navigation System
Journal Article · Wed Feb 15 00:00:00 EST 2006 · Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology · OSTI ID:21083629

Helical-Tip Needle for Transthoracic Percutaneous Image-Guided Biopsy of Lung Tumors: Results of a Pilot Prospective Comparative Study with a Standard Tru-Cut Needle
Journal Article · Thu Jun 15 00:00:00 EDT 2017 · Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology · OSTI ID:21083629