Development of Advanced Concept for Shortening Construction Period of ABWR Plant

Conference · Mon Jul 01 04:00:00 EDT 2002

OSTI ID:21062352

Ijichi, Hiroshi; Yamashita, Toshio; Tsutagawa, Masahiro; Mori, Hiroya ^[1]; Ooshima, Nobuaki; Miura, Jun ^[2]; Kanechika, Minoru ^[3]; Miura, Nobuaki ^[4]

---

1. Toshiba Corporation (Japan)
2. Hitachi Ltd. (Japan)
3. Kajima Corporation (Japan)
4. Shimizu Corporation (Japan)

Construction of a nuclear power plant (NPP) requires a very long period because of large amount of construction materials and many issues for negotiation among multiple sections. Shortening the construction period advances the date of return on an investment, and can also result in reduced construction cost. Therefore, the study of this subject has a very high priority for utilities. We achieved a construction period of 37 months from the first concrete work to fuel loading (F/L) (51.5 months from the inspection of the foundation (I/F) to the start of commercial operation (C/O)) at the Kashiwazaki-Kariwa NPPs No. 6 and 7 (KK-6/7), which are the first ABWR plants in the world. At TEPCO's next plant, we think that a construction period of less than 36 months (45 months from I/F to C/O) can be realized based on conventional methods such as early start of equipment installation and blocking of equipment to be brought in advance. Furthermore, we are studying the feasibility of a 21.5-month construction period (30 months from I/F to C/O) with advanced ideas and methods. The important concepts for a 21.5-month construction period are adoption of a new building structure that is the steel plate reinforced concrete (SC) structure and promotion of extensive modularization of equipment and building structure. With introducing these new concepts, we are planning the master schedule (M/S) and finding solutions to conflicts in the schedule of area release from building construction work to equipment installation work (schedule-conflicts.) In this report, we present the shortest construction period and an effective method to put it into practice for the conventional general arrangement (GA) of ABWR. In the future, we will continue the study on the improvement of building configuration and arrangements, and make clear of the concept for large composite modules of building structures and equipment. (authors)

• Research Organization: The ASME Foundation, Inc., Three Park Avenue, New York, NY 10016-5990 (United States)
• OSTI ID: 21062352
• Country of Publication: United States
• Language: English

Related Subjects

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS
BWR TYPE REACTORS
CONSTRUCTION
EQUIPMENT
INSPECTION
INSTALLATION
NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS
REINFORCED CONCRETE
SCHEDULES
STEELS