Skip to main content
U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Where post-Newtonian and numerical-relativity waveforms meet

Journal Article · · Physical Review. D, Particles Fields
; ; ;  [1];  [1]
  1. Theoretical Physics Institute, University of Jena, 07743 Jena (Germany)
We analyze numerical-relativity (NR) waveforms that cover nine orbits (18 gravitational-wave cycles) before merger of an equal-mass system with low eccentricity, with numerical uncertainties of 0.25 radians in the phase and 2% in the amplitude; such accuracy allows a direct comparison with post-Newtonian (PN) waveforms. We focus on waveforms predicted by one of the PN approximants that has been proposed for use in gravitational-wave data analysis, restricted 3.5PN TaylorT1, and compare these with a section of the numerical waveform from the second to the eighth orbit, which is about one and a half orbits before merger. This corresponds to a gravitational-wave frequency range of M{omega}=0.0455 to 0.1 Depending on the method of matching PN and NR waveforms, the accumulated phase disagreement over this frequency range can be within numerical uncertainty. Similar results are found in comparisons with an alternative PN approximant, 3PN TaylorT3. The amplitude disagreement, on the other hand, is around 6%, but roughly constant for all 13 cycles that are compared, suggesting that for the purpose of producing 'hybrid waveforms', only 4.5 orbits need be simulated to match PN and NR waves with the same accuracy as is possible with nine orbits. If, however, we model the amplitude up to 2.5PN order, numerical and post-Newtonian amplitude disagreement is close to the numerical error of 2%.
OSTI ID:
21039140
Journal Information:
Physical Review. D, Particles Fields, Journal Name: Physical Review. D, Particles Fields Journal Issue: 4 Vol. 77; ISSN PRVDAQ; ISSN 0556-2821
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

Similar Records

Comparison between numerical-relativity and post-Newtonian waveforms from spinning binaries: The orbital hang-up case
Journal Article · Fri Nov 14 23:00:00 EST 2008 · Physical Review. D, Particles Fields · OSTI ID:21250908

High-accuracy comparison of numerical relativity simulations with post-Newtonian expansions
Journal Article · Fri Dec 14 23:00:00 EST 2007 · Physical Review. D, Particles Fields · OSTI ID:21024063

Comparisons of eccentric binary black hole simulations with post-Newtonian models
Journal Article · Thu Jul 15 00:00:00 EDT 2010 · Physical Review. D, Particles Fields · OSTI ID:21415234