Skip to main content
U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Determination of the form factors for the decay B{sup 0}{yields}D*{sup -}l{sup +}{nu}{sub l} and of the CKM matrix element |V{sub cb}|

Journal Article · · Physical Review. D, Particles Fields
; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;  [1]; ;  [2]; ;  [3]; ; ; ;  [4]; ; ;  [5]
  1. Laboratoire de Physique des Particules, IN2P3/CNRS et Universite de Savoie, F-74941 Annecy-Le-Vieux (France)
  2. Universitat de Barcelona, Facultat de Fisica, Departament ECM, E-08028 Barcelona (Spain)
  3. Universita di Bari, Dipartimento di Fisica and INFN, I-70126 Bari (Italy)
  4. University of Bergen, Institute of Physics, N-5007 Bergen (Norway)
  5. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory and University of California, Berkeley, California 94720 (United States)
We present a combined measurement of the Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa matrix element |V{sub cb}| and of the parameters {rho}{sup 2}, R{sub 1}(1), and R{sub 2}(1), which fully characterize the form factors for the B{sup 0}{yields}D*{sup -}l{sup +}{nu}{sub l} decay in the framework of heavy-quark effective field theory. The results, based on a selected sample of about 52 800 B{sup 0}{yields}D*{sup -}l{sup +}{nu}{sub l} decays, recorded by the BABAR detector, are {rho}{sup 2}=1.157{+-}0.094{+-}0.027, R{sub 1}(1)=1.327{+-}0.131{+-}0.043, R{sub 2}(1)=0.859{+-}0.077{+-}0.021, and F(1)|V{sub cb}|=(34.7{+-}0.4{+-}1.0)x10{sup -3}. The first error is the statistical and the second is the systematic uncertainty. Combining these measurements with the previous BABAR measurement of the form factors, which employs a different fit technique on a partial sample of the data, we improve the statistical precision of the result, {rho}{sup 2}=1.191{+-}0.048{+-}0.028, R{sub 1}(1)=1.429{+-}0.061{+-}0.044, R{sub 2}(1)=0.827{+-}0.038{+-}0.022, and F(1)|V{sub cb}|=(34.4{+-}0.3{+-}1.1)x10{sup -3}. Using lattice calculations for the axial form factor F(1), we extract |V{sub cb}|=(37.4{+-}0.3{+-}1.2{+-}{sub 1.4}{sup 1.2})x10{sup -3}, where the third error is due to the uncertainty in F(1). We also present a measurement of the exclusive branching fraction, B=(4.69{+-}0.04{+-}0.34)%.
OSTI ID:
21039004
Journal Information:
Physical Review. D, Particles Fields, Journal Name: Physical Review. D, Particles Fields Journal Issue: 3 Vol. 77; ISSN PRVDAQ; ISSN 0556-2821
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English