skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Prospective comparison of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for liver cancer delineation using deformable image registration

Journal Article · · International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics
 [1];  [1];  [1];  [2];  [1]
  1. Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Hospital, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario (Canada)
  2. Department of Radiology, Princess Margaret Hospital, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario (Canada)

Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with computed tomography (CT) for liver cancer tumor definition for high-precision radiotherapy planning. Methods and Materials: Diagnostic quality MRI scans and triphasic CT scans, with the liver immobilized in exhale, were obtained at the time of radiation planning for 26 patients with unresectable liver metastases (n = 8), hepatocellular carcinoma (n = 10), and cholangiocarcinoma (n = 8). On the CT and MRI series best demonstrating the tumor, the liver and gross tumor volumes (GTVs) were contoured, and intrahepatic anatomic reference points were identified. Deformable registration was used to register the liver from the CT with that from the MRI. Results: A difference in the number of tumor foci was seen on CT vs. MRI in 5 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: MRI showed more foci in 3 patients, CT in 2. After deformable registration of the livers, the population median of the average distance between the CT tumor surface and MRI tumor surface was 3.7 mm (2.2-21.3 mm). The median percentage of tumor surface area that differed by {>=}5 mm was 26% (1-86%). Median percentage concordance volumes were 81% (77-86%) in metastases, 77% (60-88%) in hepatocellular carcinoma and 64% (25-85%) in cholangiocarcinoma. Conclusion: Differences between MRI-defined liver cancer GTVs and CT-defined GTVs can be substantial and are more common in primary liver cancer.

OSTI ID:
20850163
Journal Information:
International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics, Vol. 66, Issue 3; Conference: 48. annual meeting of the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology, Pennsylvania, PA (United States), 5-9 Nov 2006; Other Information: DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.05.035; PII: S0360-3016(06)00956-4; Copyright (c) 2006 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, Netherlands, All rights reserved; Country of input: International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA); ISSN 0360-3016
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

Similar Records

Comparative Assessment of Liver Tumor Motion Using Cine–Magnetic Resonance Imaging Versus 4-Dimensional Computed Tomography
Journal Article · Wed Apr 01 00:00:00 EDT 2015 · International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics · OSTI ID:20850163

Prospective Longitudinal Assessment of Quality of Life for Liver Cancer Patients Treated With Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy
Journal Article · Tue Sep 01 00:00:00 EDT 2015 · International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics · OSTI ID:20850163

Validation of Imaging With Pathology in Laryngeal Cancer: Accuracy of the Registration Methodology
Journal Article · Wed Feb 01 00:00:00 EST 2012 · International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics · OSTI ID:20850163