skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Comparing step-and-shoot IMRT with dynamic helical tomotherapy IMRT plans for head-and-neck cancer

Journal Article · · International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics
 [1];  [2];  [1];  [3];  [1];  [2];  [3];  [1];  [2]
  1. Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht (Netherlands)
  2. Division of Medical Physics, Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, AB (Canada)
  3. Division of Radiation Oncology, Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, AB (Canada)

Purpose: The goal of this planning study was to compare step-and-shoot intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) plans with helical dynamic IMRT plans for oropharynx patients on the basis of dose distribution. Methods and Materials: Five patients with oropharynx cancer had been previously treated by step-and-shoot IMRT at University Medical Centre Utrecht, The Netherlands, applying five fields and approximately 60-90 segments. Inverse planning was carried out using Plato, version 2.6.2. For each patient, an inverse IMRT plan was also made using Tomotherapy Hi-Art System, version 2.0, and using the same targets and optimization goals. Statistical analysis was performed by a paired t test. Results: All tomotherapy plans compared favorably with the step-and-shoot plans regarding sparing of the organs at risk and keeping an equivalent target dose homogeneity. Tomotherapy plans in particular realized sharper dose gradients compared with the step-and-shoot plans. The mean dose to all parotid glands (n = 10) decreased on average 6.5 Gy (range, -4 to 14; p = 0.002). The theoretical reduction in normal tissue complication probabilities in favor of the tomotherapy plans depended on the parotid normal tissue complication probability model used (range, -3% to 32%). Conclusion: Helical tomotherapy IMRT plans realized sharper dose gradients compared with the clinically applied step-and shoot plans. They are expected to be able to reduce the parotid normal tissue complication probability further, keeping a similar target dose homogeneity.

OSTI ID:
20698516
Journal Information:
International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics, Vol. 62, Issue 5; Other Information: DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.04.011; PII: S0360-3016(05)00691-7; Copyright (c) 2005 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved; Country of input: International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA); ISSN 0360-3016
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

Similar Records

Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) dosimetry of the head and neck: A comparison of treatment plans using linear accelerator-based IMRT and helical tomotherapy
Journal Article · Sat Jul 01 00:00:00 EDT 2006 · International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics · OSTI ID:20698516

Treatment and Dosimetric Advantages Between VMAT, IMRT, and Helical TomoTherapy in Prostate Cancer
Journal Article · Sat Oct 01 00:00:00 EDT 2011 · Medical Dosimetry · OSTI ID:20698516

Helical Tomotherapy for Parotid Gland Tumors
Journal Article · Sat Mar 01 00:00:00 EST 2008 · International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics · OSTI ID:20698516