Adequate margins for random setup uncertainties in head-and-neck IMRT
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht (Netherlands)
- Nucletron B.V., Veenendaal (Netherlands)
Purpose: To investigate the effect of random setup uncertainties on the highly conformal dose distributions produced by intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for clinical head-and-neck cancer patients and to determine adequate margins to account for those uncertainties. Methods and materials: We have implemented in our clinical treatment planning system the possibility of simulating normally distributed patient setup displacements, translations, and rotations. The planning CT data of 8 patients with Stage T1-T3N0M0 oropharyngeal cancer were used. The clinical target volumes of the primary tumor (CTV{sub primary}) and of the lymph nodes (CTV{sub elective}) were expanded by 0.0, 1.5, 3.0, and 5.0 mm in all directions, creating the planning target volumes (PTVs). We performed IMRT dose calculation using our class solution for each PTV margin, resulting in the conventional static plans. Then, the system recalculated the plan for each positioning displacement derived from a normal distribution with {sigma} = 2 mm and {sigma} = 4 mm (standard deviation) for translational deviations and {sigma} = 1 deg for rotational deviations. The dose distributions of the 30 fractions were summed, resulting in the actual plan. The CTV dose coverage of the actual plans was compared with that of the static plans. Results: Random translational deviations of {sigma} = 2 mm and rotational deviations of {sigma} = 1 deg did not affect the CTV{sub primary} volume receiving 95% of the prescribed dose (V{sub 95}) regardless of the PTV margin used. A V{sub 95} reduction of 3% and 1% for a 0.0-mm and 1.5-mm PTV margin, respectively, was observed for {sigma} = 4 mm. The V{sub 95} of the CTV{sub elective} contralateral was approximately 1% and 5% lower than that of the static plan for {sigma} = 2 mm and {sigma} = 4 mm, respectively, and for PTV margins < 5.0 mm. An additional reduction of 1% was observed when rotational deviations were included. The same effect was observed for the CTV{sub elective} ipsilateral but with smaller dose differences than those for the contralateral side. The effect of the random uncertainties on the mean dose to the parotid glands was not significant. The maximal dose to the spinal cord increased by a maximum of 3 Gy. Conclusions: The margins to account for random setup uncertainties, in our clinical IMRT solution, should be 1.5 mm and 3.0 mm in the case of {sigma} = 2 mm and {sigma} = 4 mm, respectively, for the CTV{sub primary}. Larger margins (5.0 mm), however, should be applied to the CTV{sub elective}, if the goal of treatment is a V{sub 95} value of at least 99%.
- OSTI ID:
- 20633108
- Journal Information:
- International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics, Vol. 61, Issue 3; Other Information: DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.11.016; PII: S0360-3016(04)02855-X; Copyright (c) 2005 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved; Country of input: International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA); ISSN 0360-3016
- Country of Publication:
- United States
- Language:
- English
Similar Records
Effect of patient setup errors on simultaneously integrated boost head and neck IMRT treatment plans
Evaluation of clinical margins via simulation of patient setup errors in prostate IMRT treatment plans