A comparison of treatment combinations with and without radiotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein and/or inferior vena cava tumor thrombus
- Radiation Oncology, Fudan University, Shanghai (China)
- Liver Cancer Institute, Fudan University, Shanghai (China)
- Department of Radiology, Fudan University, Shanghai (China)
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai (China)
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai (China)
Purpose: To evaluate the potential role of external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) in the treatment of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who have portal vein (PV) and/or inferior vena cava (IVC) tumor thrombi. Methods and materials: One hundred fifty-eight patients with HCC who had PV and/or IVC tumor thrombus were reviewed and analyzed by Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analysis. Forty-four patients with HCC who received local limited EBRT (in addition to other treatment modalities) were classified as the EBRT group. The total radiation dose was 36-60 Gy (median, 50 Gy) and was focused on the tumor thrombi. One hundred fourteen patients with HCC who did not receive EBRT were selected from hospitalized patients with HCC who had PV and/or IVC thrombi during the same period; these were classified as the non-EBRT group, and their intrahepatic tumors were treated with transarterial chemoembolization or resection, on the basis of the patients' status. Parameters observed included survival rates and the tumor thrombus response to EBRT as seen on CT scan or MRI. Results: Of the 44 patients who received EBRT, 15 (34.1%) showed complete disappearance of tumor thrombi, 5 (11.4%) were in partial remission, 23 (52.3%) were stable in their tumor thrombi, and 1 (2.3%) showed disease progression at the end of the study period. The median survival was 8 months, and the 1-year survival rate was 34.8% in the EBRT group. In the non-EBRT group, the median survival and 1-year survival rates were 4 months and 11.4%, respectively. In stepwise multivariate analysis, EBRT showed a strongly protective value (relative risk = 0.324, p < 0.001). Survival was not related to intrahepatic tumor status in the non-EBRT patients. However, in the EBRT group, poorer prognosis was significantly related to intrahepatic multifocal or diffusion lesions, and the most common reason for death was liver failure caused by uncontrolled intrahepatic disease. Conclusion: Although EBRT is palliative in intent, it is preferred for prolonging survival in the treatment of tumor thrombi.
- OSTI ID:
- 20633054
- Journal Information:
- International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics, Vol. 61, Issue 2; Other Information: DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.05.025; PII: S0360-3016(04)00825-9; Copyright (c) 2005 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved; Country of input: International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA); ISSN 0360-3016
- Country of Publication:
- United States
- Language:
- English
Similar Records
Consideration of role of radiotherapy for lymph node metastases in patients with HCC: Retrospective analysis for prognostic factors from 125 patients
Usefulness of Positron Emission Tomography With Fluorine-18-Fluorodeoxyglucose in Predicting Treatment Response in Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients Treated With External Beam Radiotherapy