Key issues when cofiring biomass with coal in PC boilers
Conference
·
OSTI ID:20082212
Cofiring biomass with coal in PC-fired boilers represents a near-term, low-risk, low-cost option for reducing greenhouse gas emissions, increasing renewable energy generation, and increasing sustainability of energy supplies from power production. Economically, cofiring competes favorably with other renewable options, although generally not so favorably as to reduce overall cost of fuel. This presentation focuses on five key fireside issues associated with cofiring: ash deposition, NOx production, corrosion, ash disposal, and carbon burnout. Biomass ash deposition rates and NOx emissions can either exceed or be less than those of coal, depending on the type of biomass used. SOx emissions are nearly always reduced when cofiring biomass with coal. The potential for chlorine-based, high-temperature corrosion is seen to be less significant for a biomass-coal blend than for pure biomass fuels in most cases, but may not always be negligible. Fly ash generated from wood cofiring is technically suitable for cement production, although it is precluded from such application in ASTM specifications. Fly ash from many herbaceous materials is less suitable for cement production. Biomass particles much larger than coal particles can be consumed in a PC boiler, but at sizes of 1/8 inch or larger there is increased chance of incomplete combustion. Significant carbon in flyash problems are not anticipated until initial particle sizes exceed 1/4 inch for many practical systems. Specific guidelines are suggested in each area in terms of expected behavior and best-practice operation. Prudent choices of fuels, boiler design, and boiler operation should lead to little or no fireside problems during cofiring. Less prudent choices can lead to significant boiler damage and operational costs.
- Research Organization:
- Sandia National Lab., Livermore, CA (US)
- OSTI ID:
- 20082212
- Country of Publication:
- United States
- Language:
- English
Similar Records
Benefits for coal power plants with co-located ethanol production
Characterization of fly ashes from circulating fluidized bed combustion (CFBC) boilers cofiring coal and petroleum coke
Fuel Flexibility in Combustion
Conference
·
Thu Jul 01 00:00:00 EDT 1999
·
OSTI ID:20082242
Characterization of fly ashes from circulating fluidized bed combustion (CFBC) boilers cofiring coal and petroleum coke
Journal Article
·
Tue Aug 15 00:00:00 EDT 2006
· Energy and Fuels
·
OSTI ID:20781452
Fuel Flexibility in Combustion
Conference
·
Mon Nov 05 23:00:00 EST 2001
·
OSTI ID:832866