Skip to main content
U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Methods for heat rate improvement in combined cycle applications

Conference ·
OSTI ID:20015052
Combined-cycle technology has become very attractive to both utility and non-utility power producers. This technology allows for high thermal efficiency, low emissions, low installed cost, fuel and operating flexibility, low operation and maintenance costs, short installation time, and high reliability/availability. Power producers can take advantage of this technology and customize the plant to better suit their needs; e.g., a plant intended for base load operation may be designed for the best heat rate (efficiency), whereas a cycling plant may be designed to maximize electrical output at the lowest possible cost. Methods such as gas turbine steam or water injection, inlet air chilling, evaporative cooling, and supplementary fired heat recovery steam generators (HRSGs) increase electrical power output. Most of these are associated with the Brayton cycle and, as a result, decrease plant efficiency. This may be acceptable for a cycling plant where output is most important; however, for a base loaded plant, the focus should be placed on optimizing efficiency. Methods for efficiency enhancement, all of which are associated with the Rankine cycle, include various HRSG and steam turbine generator (STG) configurations (two pressures vs. three pressure and reheat vs. non-reheat), pressurized deaerators vs. vacuum deaerators, fuel gas heating, selection of the STG last stage bucket size, upgrade of the heat sink, and increase in STG throttle pressure. Note that while the purpose of these options is to improve heat rate, they have the added benefit of increasing power output. For each efficiency improvement method, plant design, cycle performance, and economics will be discussed. A two pressure level, non-reheat, advanced gas turbine-based combined-cycle plant will be used as a basis. The goal of this paper is to aide in the proper selection of available methods in order to provide a power plant which is optimized to maximize economic return to the Owner.
Research Organization:
Bechtel Power Corp., Frederick, MD (US)
OSTI ID:
20015052
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

Similar Records

Heat-recovery steam generators: Understand the basics
Journal Article · Thu Aug 01 00:00:00 EDT 1996 · Chemical Engineering Progress · OSTI ID:378062

Various concepts for topping steam plants with gas turbines
Conference · Tue Dec 31 23:00:00 EST 1991 · Proceedings of the American Power Conference; (United States) · OSTI ID:7117280

Simplify heat recovery steam generator evaluation
Journal Article · Wed Feb 28 23:00:00 EST 1990 · Hydrocarbon Processing; (USA) · OSTI ID:6924292