skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Power demand risk models on milling machines

Journal Article · · Journal of Cleaner Production
 [1];  [2];  [1];  [3]
  1. Louisiana State Univ., Baton Rouge, LA (United States)
  2. Univ. of Miami, Coral Gables, FL (United States)
  3. Hongik University, Seoul (Korea, Republic of)

The measurement of power demand risks in manufacturing power systems will benefit manufacturers and the wider society. If the risks can be characterized using manufacturing parameters, manufacturers can better control risks originating in those parameters, select less power-risky production plans, and reduce utility costs and resource consumption. The measurement of risk can also help manufacturers and power suppliers to protect their power systems from unexpected disturbances. Existing measures of risk, however, do not consider time duration, and thus cannot accurately quantify the risks in manufacturing power systems; the risks of a period of high power demand must be evaluated with the duration of the surge. Therefore, new methods of measuring power demand risks are proposed, adapting measures drawn from the field of finance. With a focus on milling operations, processing power is shown to be a function of processing amount (A) and processing time (T), and a power demand distribution is directly derived as a joint distribution of A and T. A bivariate random variable model with copulas is applied to examine the correlation in the joint distribution. Then, based on evaluation of a probability distribution of power demand from A and T, new risk measures are introduced. Illustrative examples are provided to show how the proposed measures can quantify the power demand risks from milling machines, based on manufacturing parameters. Certain manufacturing parameters are found to affect overall power demand risks, including i) raw material type, ii) variability in processing time, and iii) correlation between A and T. In the examples, these three factors increase power demand risks by up to 108%, 67%, and 1% respectively.

Research Organization:
Louisiana State Univ., Baton Rouge, LA (United States)
Sponsoring Organization:
USDOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)
Grant/Contract Number:
EE0007709
OSTI ID:
1994150
Alternate ID(s):
OSTI ID: 1994456
Journal Information:
Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 165; ISSN 0959-6526
Publisher:
ElsevierCopyright Statement
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

References (28)

Modelling and analysis of energy footprint of manufacturing systems journal September 2014
Energy use analysis and local benchmarking of manufacturing lines journal October 2017
Managing risk in the new power business journal April 2000
Energy-aware scheduling for improving manufacturing process sustainability: A mathematical model for flexible flow shops journal January 2012
Demand response in U.S. electricity markets: Empirical evidence journal April 2010
Towards energy and resource efficient manufacturing: A processes and systems approach journal January 2012
Density of the Ratio of Two Normal Random Variables and Applications journal September 2006
Energy management in manufacturing: From literature review to a conceptual framework journal November 2017
Energy-efficient scheduling in manufacturing companies: A review and research framework journal February 2016
Why risk analysis outperforms probabilistic choice as the effective decision support paradigm for power system planning journal May 1998
Flow shop scheduling with peak power consumption constraints journal January 2013
Methodology for planning and operating energy-efficient production systems journal January 2011
Measuring variability on electrical power demands in manufacturing operations journal November 2016
Risk and uncertainty in power system planning journal April 1991
Significance and statistical errors in the analysis of DNA microarray data journal September 2002
Optimizing the production scheduling of a single machine to minimize total energy consumption costs journal March 2014
Evaluating the use phase energy requirements of a machine tool system journal April 2011
An energy management approach for the mechanical manufacturing industry through developing a multi-objective energy benchmark journal January 2017
Sustainability in manufacturing operations scheduling: A state of the art review journal October 2015
Thermodynamic Analysis of Resources Used in Manufacturing Processes journal January 2009
The energy scheduling problem: Industrial case-study and constraint propagation techniques journal May 2013
On the ratio of two correlated normal random variables journal January 1969
Energy models for demand forecasting—A review journal February 2012
Energy oriented simulation of manufacturing systems – Concept and application journal January 2011
Everything You Always Wanted to Know about Copula Modeling but Were Afraid to Ask journal July 2007
Minimising Embodied Product Energy to support energy efficient manufacturing journal January 2010
Fine energy consumption allowance of workpieces in the mechanical manufacturing industry journal November 2016
A production planning methodology for semiconductor manufacturing based on iterative simulation and linear programming calculations journal May 1996

Similar Records

Estimating manufacturing electricity costs by simulating dependence between production parameters
Journal Article · Wed Aug 15 00:00:00 EDT 2018 · Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing · OSTI ID:1994150

A nonparametric approach to modeling dependence among production parameters for energy cost estimation
Journal Article · Wed Jun 03 00:00:00 EDT 2020 · International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology · OSTI ID:1994150

Multi-Mechanism Flood Hazard Assessment: Critical Review of Current Practice and Approaches
Technical Report · Wed Jul 01 00:00:00 EDT 2020 · OSTI ID:1994150