skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Changes in wild pig ( Sus scrofa ) relative abundance, crop damage, and environmental impacts in response to control efforts

Journal Article · · Pest Management Science
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.7671· OSTI ID:1992977
ORCiD logo [1];  [2];  [1]; ORCiD logo [1]
  1. Savannah River Ecology Laboratory University of Georgia Aiken SC USA, Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources University of Georgia Athens GA USA
  2. United States Department of Agriculture Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Wildlife Services, National Wildlife Research Center Fort Collins CO USA

Abstract BACKGROUND As the population and range of wild pigs ( Sus scrofa ) continue to grow across North America, there has been an increase in environmental and economic damages caused by this invasive species, and control efforts to reduce damages have increased concomitantly. Despite the expanding impacts and costs associated with population control of wild pigs, the extent to which wild pig control reduces populations and diminishes environmental and agricultural damages are rarely quantified. The goal of this study is to quantify changes in wild pig relative abundance and subsequent changes in damages caused by invasive wild pigs in response to control. RESULTS Using a combination of wild pig population surveys, agricultural damage assessments, and environmental rooting surveys across 19 mixed forest‐agricultural properties in South Carolina, USA, we quantified changes in wild pig relative abundance and associated damages over a 3‐year period following implementation of a professional control program. Following implementation of control efforts, both the number of wild pig detections and estimated abundance decreased markedly. Within 24 months relative abundance was reduced by an average of ~70%, which resulted in a corresponding decline in environmental rooting damage by ~99%. CONCLUSION Our findings suggest that sustained wild pig control efforts can substantially reduce wild pig relative abundance, which in turn resulted in a reduction in environmental rooting damage by wild pigs. Ultimately this study will help fill critical knowledge gaps regarding the efficacy of wild pig control programs and the effort needed to reduce impacts to native ecosystems, livestock, and crops. © 2023 The Authors. Pest Management Science published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry.

Sponsoring Organization:
USDOE
OSTI ID:
1992977
Alternate ID(s):
OSTI ID: 1995921
Journal Information:
Pest Management Science, Journal Name: Pest Management Science Vol. 79 Journal Issue: 12; ISSN 1526-498X
Publisher:
Wiley Blackwell (John Wiley & Sons)Copyright Statement
Country of Publication:
United Kingdom
Language:
English

References (40)

Monitoring wild pig populations: a review of methods journal July 2013
Health Status of a Recently Discovered Population of Feral Swine in Kansas journal July 1999
Territoriality of Feral Pigs in a Highly Persecuted Population on Fort Benning, Georgia journal May 2009
Timing and extent of crop damage by wild pigs (Sus scrofa Linnaeus) to corn and peanut fields journal July 2020
A review of wild boar Sus scrofa diet and factors affecting food selection in native and introduced ranges: A review of wild boar Sus scrofa diet journal October 2013
Eradication of Feral Pigs From Pinnacles National Monument journal August 2008
Invasion ecology of wild pigs (Sus scrofa) in Florida, USA: the role of humans in the expansion and colonization of an invasive wild ungulate journal January 2018
Potential effects of incorporating fertility control into typical culling regimes in wild pig populations journal August 2017
Diet of wild boar Sus scrofa in Western Europe, with particular reference to consumption of agricultural crops: Diet of wild boar journal March 2003
Method-Specific Costs of Feral Swine Removal in a Large Metapopulation: The Texas Experience journal January 2014
Niche conservatism and the invasive potential of the wild boar journal July 2017
Wild boars as sources for infectious diseases in livestock and humans journal September 2009
The Effectiveness of Hunting Dogs for Removing Feral Pigs (Sus Scrofa). journal January 1995
An evaluation of feral pig trapping journal January 1993
Escherichia coliO157:H7 in Feral Swine near Spinach Fields and Cattle, Central California Coast1 journal December 2007
Hog Heaven? Challenges of Managing Introduced Wild Pigs in Natural Areas journal January 2017
Predation and disease-related economic impacts of wild pigs on livestock producers in 13 states journal July 2019
Rapid eradication of feral pigs (Sus scrofa) from Santa Cruz Island, California journal March 2010
Influence of intrinsic and extrinsic attributes on neonate survival in an invasive large mammal journal May 2021
Anthropogenic factors predict movement of an invasive species journal June 2017
Modeling and Mapping the Probability of Occurrence of Invasive Wild Pigs across the Contiguous United States journal August 2015
Wildlife Damage to Corn in Pennsylvania: Farmer and On-the-Ground Estimates
  • Tzilkowski, Walter M.; Brittingham, Margaret C.; Lovallo, Matthew J.
  • The Journal of Wildlife Management, Vol. 66, Issue 3 https://doi.org/10.2307/3803134
journal July 2002
Diet of wild boar Sus scrofa L. and crop damage in an intensive agroecosystem journal May 2006
Determinants of invasive species policy: Print media and agriculture determine U.S. invasive wild pig policy journal August 2018
Impacts of biological invasions: what's what and the way forward journal January 2013
Historical, current, and potential population size estimates of invasive wild pigs (Sus scrofa) in the United States journal April 2019
Wild Pigs: Biology, Damage, Control Techniques and Management report December 2009
The influence of environmental and physiological factors on the litter size of wild boar ( Sus scrofa ) in an agriculture dominated area in Germany journal January 2016
Damage caused to rangelands by wild pig rooting activity is mitigated with intensive trapping journal January 2018
A Rapid Population Assessment Method for Wild Pigs Using Baited Cameras at 3 Study Sites journal March 2020
Factors affecting the level of damage by wild boar in farmland in north-eastern Poland journal August 2012
What Is a Mild Winter? Regional Differences in Within-Species Responses to Climate Change journal July 2015
Interpreting and predicting the spread of invasive wild pigs journal January 2017
Consequences Associated with the Recent Range Expansion of Nonnative Feral Swine journal February 2014
Feral wild boar distribution and perceptions of risk on the central Canadian prairies: Distribution and Risk Perceptions of Prairie Boar journal April 2014
Wild boar populations up, numbers of hunters down? A review of trends and implications for Europe: wild boar and hunter trends in Europe journal January 2015
Cross-species transmission potential between wild pigs, livestock, poultry, wildlife, and humans: implications for disease risk management in North America journal August 2017
Impact of wild boar (Sus scrofa) in its introduced and native range: a review journal April 2012
Influence of harvesting pressure on demographic tactics: implications for wildlife management: Harvesting & demographic tactics journal June 2011
Behavioral state resource selection in invasive wild pigs in the Southeastern United States journal March 2021

Similar Records

Invasive wild pig ( Sus scrofa ) diets on barrier islands in the southeastern United States
Journal Article · Tue Apr 02 00:00:00 EDT 2024 · Pest Management Science · OSTI ID:1992977

A Rapid Population Assessment Method for Wild Pigs Using Baited Cameras at 3 Study Sites
Journal Article · Thu Mar 05 00:00:00 EST 2020 · Wildlife Society Bulletin (Online) · OSTI ID:1992977

Research priorities for managing invasive wild pigs in North America
Journal Article · Thu Feb 22 00:00:00 EST 2018 · Journal of Wildlife Management · OSTI ID:1992977

Related Subjects