Skip to main content
U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Soils' dirty little secret: Depth–based comparisons can be inadequate for quantifying changes in soil organic carbon and other mineral soil properties

Journal Article · · Global Change Biology
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.15124· OSTI ID:1991884
Quantifying changes in soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks and other soil properties is essential for understanding how soils will respond to land management practices and global change. Although they are widely used, comparisons of SOC stocks at fixed depth (FD) intervals are subject to errors when changes in bulk density or soil organic matter occur. The equivalent soil mass (ESM) method has been recommended in lieu of FD for assessing changes in SOC stocks in mineral soils, but ESM remains underutilized for SOC stocks and has rarely been used for other soil properties. In this paper, we draw attention to the limitations of the FD method and demonstrate the advantages of the ESM approach. We provide illustrations to show that the FD approach is susceptible to errors not only for quantifying SOC stocks but also for soil mass-based properties such as SOC mass percent, C:N mass ratio, and δ13C. Here we describe the ESM approach and show how it mitigates the FD method limitations. Using bulk density change simulations applied to an empirical dataset from bioenergy cropping systems, we show that the ESM method provides consistently lower errors than FD when quantifying changes in SOC stocks and other soil properties. To simplify the use of ESM, we detail how the method can be integrated into sampling schemes, and we provide an example R computer script that can perform ESM calculations on large datasets. We encourage future studies, whether temporal or comparative, to utilize sampling methods that are amenable to the ESM approach. Overall, we agree with previous recommendations that ESM should be the standard method for evaluating SOC stock changes in mineral soils, but we further suggest that ESM may also be preferred for comparisons of other soil properties including mass percentages, elemental mass ratios, and stable isotope composition.
Research Organization:
Center for Advanced Bioenergy and Bioproducts Innovation (CABBI), Urbana, IL (United States)
Sponsoring Organization:
USDOE; USDOE Office of Science (SC), Biological and Environmental Research (BER)
Grant/Contract Number:
SC0018420
OSTI ID:
1991884
Alternate ID(s):
OSTI ID: 1803421
OSTI ID: 1630157
Journal Information:
Global Change Biology, Journal Name: Global Change Biology Journal Issue: 7 Vol. 26; ISSN 1354-1013
Publisher:
WileyCopyright Statement
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

References (38)

An alternative approach to reduce algorithm‐derived biases in monitoring soil organic carbon changes journal May 2019
The depth distribution of organic carbon in the soils of eastern Australia journal January 2016
Changes in the soil after clearing tropical forest journal August 1964
Depth trends of soil organic matter C:N and 15N natural abundance controlled by association with minerals journal November 2017
Multiple models and experiments underscore large uncertainty in soil carbon dynamics journal October 2018
Determining soil carbon stock changes: Simple bulk density corrections fail journal December 2009
Comment on “Determining soil carbon stock changes: Simple bulk density corrections fail” [Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 134 (2009) 251–256] journal February 2010
Towards sound comparisons of soil carbon stocks: A proposal based on the cumulative coordinates approach journal October 2015
A critical review of the conventional SOC to SOM conversion factor journal May 2010
Effects of long-term organic and mineral fertilizers on bulk density and penetration resistance in semi-arid Mediterranean soil conditions journal December 2010
Long-term controls on soil organic carbon with depth and time: A case study from the Cowlitz River Chronosequence, WA USA journal June 2015
Soil organic matter accumulation in relation to changing soil volume, mass, and structure: Concepts and calculations journal September 2017
When bulk density methods matter: Implications for estimating soil organic carbon pools in rocky soils journal February 2012
The nature and dynamics of soil organic matter: Plant inputs, microbial transformations, and organic matter stabilization journal July 2016
Soil bulk density and crop yield under eleven consecutive years of corn with different tillage and residue practices in a sandy loam soil in central Canada journal November 2005
A comparison of the organic matter, biomass, adenosine triphosphate and mineralizable nitrogen contents of ploughed and direct-drilled soils journal December 1981
Managing uncertainty in soil carbon feedbacks to climate change journal July 2016
Soil carbon stocks and bulk density: spatial or cumulative mass coordinates as a basis of expression? journal November 2003
Quantifying carbon for agricultural soil management: from the current status toward a global soil information system journal September 2019
Revisiting IPCC Tier 1 coefficients for soil organic and biomass carbon storage in agroforestry systems journal December 2018
Rapid Changes in soil Carbon and Structural Properties due to Stover Removal from No-Till corn Plots journal January 2006
An equivalent soil mass procedure for monitoring soil organic carbon in multiple soil layers journal January 2013
Uncertainty in soil carbon accounting due to unrecognized soil erosion journal October 2012
How to measure, report and verify soil carbon change to realize the potential of soil carbon sequestration for atmospheric greenhouse gas removal journal October 2019
Consensus, uncertainties and challenges for perennial bioenergy crops and land use journal November 2017
Changes caused by Norway spruce in an ochreous brown earth, assessed by the isoquartz method journal December 1988
Total carbon and nitrogen in the soils of the world journal June 1996
Impact of tropical land-use change on soil organic carbon stocks - a meta-analysis: SOIL ORGANIC CARBON AND LAND-USE CHANGE journal November 2010
Accurate Monotonicity Preserving Cubic Interpolation journal December 1983
The Theoretical Interpretation of Field Observations of Soil Swelling Through a Material Coordinate Transformation journal March 1976
Soil Carbon, Nitrogen, and Bulk Density Comparisons in Two Cropland Tillage Systems after 25 Years and in Virgin Grassland journal November 1981
A Cumulative Mass Coordinate to Determine Water Profile Changes in Variable Volume Soil journal July 1987
Assessment of a Method to Measure Temporal Change in Soil Carbon Storage journal September 2002
Predictive Quality of Pedotransfer Functions for Estimating Bulk Density of Forest Soils journal March 2005
Correction of Bulk Density and Sampling Method Biases Using Soil Mass per Unit Area journal January 2009
Calculation of organic matter and nutrients stored in soils under contrasting management regimes journal November 1995
Storage and stability of organic carbon in soils as related to depth, occlusion within aggregates, and attachment to minerals journal January 2013
Comment on “Soil organic stocks are systematically overestimated by misuse of the parameters bulk density and rock fragment content” by Poeplau et al. (2017) journal January 2018