skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: What drives forest carbon storage? The ramifications of source–sink decoupling

Journal Article · · New Phytologist
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.18415· OSTI ID:1991281
ORCiD logo [1]; ORCiD logo [2]
  1. Smithsonian’s National Zoo & Conservation Biology Institute, Front Royal, VA (United States); Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Panama City (Panama)
  2. Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO (United States)

As the climate changes and scientists seek to project its future course, an important uncertainty lies in the response of forests. Will rising atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) and lengthening growing seasons relieve limitations to tree growth, allowing increased carbon (C) sequestration in long-lived woody tissues and providing a negative feedback to climate change? Or will increasing heat and drought stress reduce growth and increase mortality, resulting in a positive feedback to climate change? Furthermore, to answer this question, global C cycle models simulate photosynthesis under future conditions, using simple plant C allocation schemes to estimate the amount of C sequestered in woody growth vs that allocated to short-lived pools that are more rapidly respired back to the atmosphere as CO2 (Fatichi et al., 2014). However, there is growing evidence that these schemes are too simplistic, as wood production is frequently decoupled from photosynthesis (Delpierre et al., 2016a,b; Etzold et al., 2022), either through the passive limitation of woody tree growth by environmental conditions or active allocation prioritising other sinks. Needed, then, is an understanding of how woody growth is jointly shaped by photosynthesis (i.e. source limitation) and demand from various C sinks (i.e. sink limitation) across species and biomes (Körner, 2015). In this issue of New Phytologist, Martínez-Sancho et al. (2022; pp. 58–70) exemplifies the type of research needed to improve our ability to predict forest C sequestration under climate change, using an innovative approach to describe the seasonal course of C sequestration in tree stem growth and how it is affected by drought.

Research Organization:
Univ. of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT (United States)
Sponsoring Organization:
USDOE Office of Science (SC), Biological and Environmental Research (BER); US Department of Agriculture National Institute of Food and Agriculture Sustainable Agricultural Systems program
Grant/Contract Number:
SC0022052; 2021-68012-35898
OSTI ID:
1991281
Journal Information:
New Phytologist, Vol. 236, Issue 1; ISSN 0028-646X
Publisher:
WileyCopyright Statement
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

References (14)

Global patterns of forest autotrophic carbon fluxes journal March 2021
Paradigm shift in plant growth control journal June 2015
Why trees grow at night journal July 2021
Woody biomass production lags stem-girth increase by over one month in coniferous forests journal October 2015
Drought impacts on tree carbon sequestration and water use – evidence from intra‐annual tree‐ring characteristics journal June 2022
Cross-biome synthesis of source versus sink limits to tree growth journal May 2022
Moving beyond photosynthesis: from carbon source to sink-driven vegetation modeling journal November 2013
Drought timing and local climate determine the sensitivity of eastern temperate forests to drought journal March 2018
The fate of carbon in a mature forest under carbon dioxide enrichment journal April 2020
Wood phenology, not carbon input, controls the interannual variability of wood growth in a temperate oak forest journal November 2015
Number of growth days and not length of the growth period determines radial stem growth of temperate trees journal December 2021
Drought-induced decoupling between carbon uptake and tree growth impacts forest carbon turnover time journal July 2022
Temperate and boreal forest tree phenology: from organ-scale processes to terrestrial ecosystem models journal March 2016
On the need to consider wood formation processes in global vegetation models and a suggested approach journal April 2019