Modeling of Cube Array Roughness: RANS, Large Eddy Simulation, and Direct Numerical Simulation
Abstract
Flow over arrays of cubes is an extensively studied model problem for rough wall turbulent boundary layers. While considerable research has been performed in computationally investigating these topologies using direct numerical simulation (DNS) and large eddy simulation (LES), the ability of sublayer-resolved Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) to predict the bulk flow phenomena of these systems is relatively unexplored, especially at low and high packing densities. Here, RANS simulations are conducted on six different packing densities of cubes in aligned and staggered configurations. The packing densities investigated span from what would classically be defined as isolated, up to those in the d-type roughness regime, filling in the gap in the present literature. Three different sublayer-resolved turbulence closure models were tested for each case: a low Reynolds number k–ϵ model, the Menter k–ω SST model, and a full Reynolds stress model. Comparisons of the velocity fields, secondary flow features, and drag coefficients are made between the RANS results and existing LES and DNS results. There is a significant degree of variability in the performance of the various RANS models across all comparison metrics. However, the Reynolds stress model demonstrated the best accuracy in terms of the mean velocity profile as well as drag partition across the range of packing densities.
- Research Organization:
- US Department of Energy (USDOE), Washington, DC (United States). Office of Fossil Energy (FE)
- Sponsoring Organization:
- USDOE
- OSTI ID:
- 1982931
- Journal Information:
- Journal of Fluids Engineering, Journal Name: Journal of Fluids Engineering Journal Issue: 6 Vol. 144; ISSN 0098-2202
- Publisher:
- ASME
- Country of Publication:
- United States
- Language:
- English
Similar Records
Bluff-body flow simulations using hybrid RANS/LES.
Evaluation of RANS vs. LES simulation of fluid flow through 3 × 3 rod bundle with a simple spacer grid as a precursor to coupled fluid–structure interaction simulations