Skip to main content
U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Nonradiative Recombination Dominates Voltage Losses in Cu(In,Ga)Se 2 Solar Cells Fabricated using Different Methods

Journal Article · · Solar RRL
 [1];  [2];  [3];  [4];  [4];  [5];  [5];  [5];  [6];  [6];  [2];  [3];  [1]
  1. Materials, Chemical, and Computational Science National Renewable Energy Laboratory Golden CO 80401 USA
  2. Metallurgical and Materials Engineering Colorado School of Mines Golden CO 80401 USA
  3. The Ohio State University Columbus OH 43210 USA
  4. Zentrum für Sonnenenergie-und Wasserstoff-Forschung 70563 Stuttgart Germany
  5. Nantes Université CNRS Institut des Matériaux de Nantes Jean Rouxel IMN F-44000 Nantes France
  6. Institute of Energy Conversion University of Delaware Newark DE 19716 USA

Voltage losses reduce the photovoltaic conversion efficiency of thin‐film solar cells and are a primary efficiency limitation in Cu(In,Ga)Se 2 . Herein, voltage loss analysis of Cu(In,Ga)Se 2 solar cells fabricated at three institutions with variation in process, bandgap, absorber structure, postdeposition treatment (PDT), and efficiency is presented. Nonradiative voltage losses due to Shockley–Read–Hall charge carrier recombination dominate and constitute >75% of the total compared to <25% from radiative voltage losses. The radiative voltage loss results from nonideal absorption and carriers in band tails that stem from local composition‐driven potential fluctuations. It is shown that significant bulk lifetime improvements are achieved for all alkali PDT processed absorbers, chiefly associated with reductions in nonradiative recombination. Primary voltage loss contributions (radiative and nonradiative) change little across fabrication processes, but variation in submechanisms (bulk lifetime, net acceptor concentration, and interface recombination) differentiate nonradiative loss pathways in this series of solar cells.

Research Organization:
National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), Golden, CO (United States)
Sponsoring Organization:
German Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy; USDOE; USDOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE), Renewable Power Office. Solar Energy Technologies Office
Grant/Contract Number:
AC36-08GO28308; EE0008755
OSTI ID:
1970804
Alternate ID(s):
OSTI ID: 1969986
OSTI ID: 1983507
Report Number(s):
NREL/JA-5900-85231; 2300075
Journal Information:
Solar RRL, Journal Name: Solar RRL Journal Issue: 11 Vol. 7; ISSN 2367-198X
Publisher:
Wiley Blackwell (John Wiley & Sons)Copyright Statement
Country of Publication:
Germany
Language:
English

References (39)

Chalcogenide Photovoltaics book January 2011
What Makes a Good Solar Cell? journal March 2018
Wide bandgap Cu(In,Ga)Se 2 solar cells with improved energy conversion efficiency : Wide bandgap Cu(In,Ga)Se
  • Contreras, Miguel A.; Mansfield, Lorelle M.; Egaas, Brian
  • Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications, Vol. 20, Issue 7 https://doi.org/10.1002/pip.2244
journal June 2012
Effect of heat-bias soaking on cesium fluoride-treated CIGS thin film solar cells journal July 2018
Influence of Ga back grading on voltage loss in low‐temperature co‐evaporated Cu(In,Ga)Se2 thin film solar cells journal March 2021
How band tail recombination influences the open‐circuit voltage of solar cells journal July 2021
Alternative alkali fluoride post‐deposition treatment under elemental sulfur atmosphere for high‐efficiency Cu(In,Ga)Se 2 ‐based solar cells journal November 2021
Effects of heavy alkali elements in Cu(In,Ga)Se 2 solar cells with efficiencies up to 22.6% journal July 2016
Large‐Area (Ag,Cu)(In,Ga)Se 2 Thin‐Film Solar Cells with Increased Bandgap and Reduced Voltage Losses Realized with Bulk Defect Reduction and Front‐Grading of the Absorber Bandgap journal May 2022
Back surface band gap gradings in Cu(In,Ga)Se2 solar cells journal May 2001
Band-gap grading in Cu(In,Ga)Se2 solar cells journal November 2005
What limits the efficiency of chalcopyrite solar cells? journal June 2011
Effect of potassium fluoride post-deposition treatment on Cu(In,Ga)Se2 thin films and solar cells fabricated onto sodalime glass substrates journal October 2016
Comparison of Ag and Ga alloying in low bandgap CuInSe2-based solar cells journal June 2019
The electronic structure of Cu(In1−xGax)Se2 alloyed with silver journal August 2011
Electrical characterization of Cu(In,Ga)Se 2 -solar cells by voltage dependent time-resolved photoluminescence journal May 2015
Potassium-induced surface modification of Cu(In,Ga)Se2 thin films for high-efficiency solar cells journal November 2013
Unveiling the effects of post-deposition treatment with different alkaline elements on the electronic properties of CIGS thin film solar cells journal January 2014
Impact of RbF-PDT on Cu(In,Ga)Se2 solar cells with CdS and Zn(O,S) buffer layers journal January 2020
Determination of minority carrier lifetimes in CuInSe2 thin films journal November 1996
Efficiency enhancement of Cu(In,Ga)Se2 solar cells due to post-deposition Na incorporation journal February 2004
Detailed Balance Limit of Efficiency of p‐n Junction Solar Cells journal March 1961
Device and material characterization of Cu(InGa)Se2 solar cells with increasing band gap journal May 1996
Beneficial effect of post-deposition treatment in high-efficiency Cu(In,Ga)Se2 solar cells through reduced potential fluctuations journal August 2016
Defect-mediated metastability and carrier lifetimes in polycrystalline (Ag,Cu)(In,Ga)Se 2 absorber materials journal June 2020
Unified potential fluctuations model for photoluminescence spectra at room temperature—Cu(In,Ga)Se2 thin films journal September 2021
Diverse simulations of time-resolved photoluminescence in thin-film solar cells: A SnO2/CdSeyTe1−y case study journal October 2021
Efficiency Potential of Photovoltaic Materials and Devices Unveiled by Detailed-Balance Analysis journal April 2017
Reciprocity relation between photovoltaic quantum efficiency and electroluminescent emission of solar cells journal August 2007
The Comparison of (Ag,Cu)(In,Ga)Se$_{\bf 2}$ and Cu(In,Ga)Se$_{\bf 2}$ Thin Films Deposited by Three-Stage Coevaporation journal January 2014
Comparison of CIGS Solar Cells Made With Different Structures and Fabrication Techniques journal January 2017
High V oc in (Cu,Ag)(In,Ga)Se 2 Solar Cells journal November 2017
Record Efficiency for Thin-Film Polycrystalline Solar Cells Up to 22.9% Achieved by Cs-Treated Cu(In,Ga)(Se,S) 2 journal January 2019
Effect of Diode Field on Time-Resolved Photoluminescence of CdTe-Based Solar Cells journal March 2022
Evaluating Recombination Mechanisms in RbF Treated Cu(In${}_\mathrm{x}$Ga$_\mathrm{1-x}$)Se$_{2}$ Solar Cells journal November 2022
A Simulation Study on Radiative Recombination Analysis in CIGS Solar Cell conference June 2017
Upper limit for the conversion of solar energy journal April 1980
High efficiency Cu(In,Ga)Se2-based solar cells: processing of novel absorber structures
  • Contreras, M.A.; Tuttle, J.; Gabor, A.
  • Proceedings of 1994 IEEE 1st World Conference on Photovoltaic Energy Conversion - WCPEC (A Joint Conference of PVSC, PVSEC and PSEC) https://doi.org/10.1109/WCPEC.1994.519811
conference January 1994
A New Approach to Valence and Conduction Band Grading in CIGS Thin Film Solar Cells journal January 2012

Similar Records

Voltage Loss Comparison in CdSe/CdTe Solar Cells and Polycrystalline CdSeTe Heterostructures
Journal Article · Tue Oct 26 20:00:00 EDT 2021 · IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics · OSTI ID:1832225