skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Incorporation of aerosol into the COSPv2 satellite lidar simulator for climate model evaluation

Journal Article · · Geoscientific Model Development (Online)

Abstract. Atmospheric aerosol has substantial impacts on climate, air quality and biogeochemical cycles, and its concentrations are highly variable in space and time. A key variability to evaluate within models that simulate aerosol is the vertical distribution, which influences atmospheric heating profiles and aerosol–cloud interactions, to help constrain aerosol residence time and to better represent the magnitude of simulated impacts. To ensure a consistent comparison between modeled and observed vertical distribution of aerosol, we implemented an aerosol lidar simulator within the Cloud Feedback Model Intercomparison Project (CFMIP) Observation Simulator Package version 2 (COSPv2). We assessed the attenuated total backscattered (ATB) signal and the backscatter ratios (SRs) at 532 nm in the U.S. Department of Energy's Energy Exascale Earth System Model version 1 (E3SMv1). The simulator performs the computations at the same vertical resolution as the Cloud-Aerosol Lidar with Orthogonal Polarization (CALIOP), making use of aerosol optics from the E3SMv1 model as inputs and assuming that aerosol is uniformly distributed horizontally within each model grid box. The simulator applies a cloud masking and an aerosol detection threshold to obtain the ATB and SR profiles that would be observed above clouds by CALIOP with its aerosol detection capability. Our analysis shows that the aerosol distribution simulated at a seasonal timescale is generally in good agreement with observations. Over the Southern Ocean, however, the model does not produce the SR maximum as observed in the real world. Comparison between clear-sky and all-sky SRs shows little differences, indicating that the cloud screening by potentially incorrect model clouds does not affect the mean aerosol signal averaged over a season. This indicates that the differences between observed and simulated SR values are due not to sampling errors, but to deficiencies in the representation of aerosol in models. Finally, we highlight the need for future applications of lidar observations at multiple wavelengths to provide insights into aerosol properties and distribution and their representation in Earth system models.

Research Organization:
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL), Richland, WA (United States)
Sponsoring Organization:
USDOE Office of Science (SC), Biological and Environmental Research (BER); Centre National d'Etudes Spatiales (EECLAT)
Grant/Contract Number:
74358; AC05-76RL01830
OSTI ID:
1958925
Alternate ID(s):
OSTI ID: 1968810
Report Number(s):
PNNL-SA-174122
Journal Information:
Geoscientific Model Development (Online), Journal Name: Geoscientific Model Development (Online) Vol. 16 Journal Issue: 4; ISSN 1991-9603
Publisher:
Copernicus GmbHCopyright Statement
Country of Publication:
Germany
Language:
English

References (45)

How does increasing horizontal resolution in a global climate model improve the simulation of aerosol-cloud interactions?: RESOLUTION DEPENDENCE OF AIF journal June 2015
Direct atmosphere opacity observations from CALIPSO provide new constraints on cloud-radiation interactions: GOCCP v3.0 OPAQ Algorithm journal January 2017
Aerosol vertical distribution and optical properties over China from long-term satellite and ground-based remote sensing journal January 2017
Laboratory simulations and parameterization of the primary marine aerosol production: THE PRIMARY MARINE AEROSOL SOURCE journal May 2003
The DOE E3SM Coupled Model Version 1: Overview and Evaluation at Standard Resolution journal July 2019
The Potential of a Multidecade Spaceborne Lidar Record to Constrain Cloud Feedback journal May 2018
The CALIPSO version 4 automated aerosol classification and lidar ratio selection algorithm journal January 2018
A GCM study of effects of radiative forcing of sulfate aerosol on large scale circulation and rainfall in East Asia during boreal spring journal January 2007
Black carbon semi-direct effects on cloud cover: review and synthesis journal January 2010
The global 3-D distribution of tropospheric aerosols as characterized by CALIOP journal January 2013
Aerosol indirect effect on warm clouds over South-East Atlantic, from co-located MODIS and CALIPSO observations journal January 2013
An Overview of the Atmospheric Component of the Energy Exascale Earth System Model journal August 2019
Lidar signal simulation for the evaluation of aerosols in chemistry transport models journal January 2012
Historical (1750–2014) anthropogenic emissions of reactive gases and aerosols from the Community Emissions Data System (CEDS) journal January 2018
Understanding Cloud and Convective Characteristics in Version 1 of the E3SM Atmosphere Model journal October 2018
Use of CALIPSO lidar observations to evaluate the cloudiness simulated by a climate model journal January 2008
Evaluation of the aerosol vertical distribution in global aerosol models through comparison against CALIOP measurements: AeroCom phase II results: AEROSOL PROFILES IN AEROCOM II GCM journal June 2016
Influences of Recent Particle Formation on Southern Ocean Aerosol Variability and Low Cloud Properties journal April 2021
Constraining the Twomey effect from satellite observations: issues and perspectives journal January 2020
Comparison of Two Different Cloud Climatologies Derived from CALIOP-Attenuated Backscattered Measurements (Level 1): The CALIPSO-ST and the CALIPSO-GOCCP journal April 2013
Application of the CALIOP layer product to evaluate the vertical distribution of aerosols estimated by global models: AeroCom phase I results: AEROSOL PROFILES IN GLOBAL MODELS journal May 2012
Global view of aerosol vertical distributions from CALIPSO lidar measurements and GOCART simulations: Regional and seasonal variations journal January 2010
The global aerosol-climate model ECHAM-HAM, version 2: sensitivity to improvements in process representations journal January 2012
Evaluation of the cloud thermodynamic phase in a climate model using CALIPSO-GOCCP: CALIPSO-GOCCP CLOUD THERMODYNAMIC PHASE journal July 2013
Comparison of aerosol chemistry transport model simulations with lidar and Sun photometer observations at a site near Paris: CHIMERE EVALUATION WITH OPTICAL DATA journal December 2004
Validation and Sensitivities of Frontal Clouds Simulated by the ECMWF Model journal October 1999
Observational constraint on cloud susceptibility weakened by aerosol retrieval limitations journal July 2018
Parameterization of optical properties for hydrated internally mixed aerosol: PARAMETERIZATION OF OPTICAL PROPERTIES FOR HYDRATED AEROSOL journal May 2007
Historic global biomass burning emissions for CMIP6 (BB4CMIP) based on merging satellite observations with proxies and fire models (1750–2015) journal January 2017
The Global Atmosphere‐aerosol Model ICON‐A‐HAM2.3–Initial Model Evaluation and Effects of Radiation Balance Tuning on Aerosol Optical Thickness journal April 2022
Limitations of passive remote sensing to constrain global cloud condensation nuclei journal January 2016
Use of A-train satellite observations (CALIPSO–PARASOL) to evaluate tropical cloud properties in the LMDZ5 GCM journal November 2015
Changing patterns in aerosol vertical distribution over South and East Asia journal January 2021
On the Limits of CALIOP for Constraining Modeled Free Tropospheric Aerosol journal September 2018
Aerosol Remote Sensing over Clouds Using A-Train Observations journal August 2009
The Modern-Era Retrospective Analysis for Research and Applications, Version 2 (MERRA-2) journal July 2017
An EarthCARE/ATLID simulator to evaluate cloud description in climate models: AN EARTHCARE/ATLID SIMULATOR journal November 2015
How well do climate models simulate cloud vertical structure? A comparison between CALIPSO‐GOCCP satellite observations and CMIP5 models journal October 2012
The Cloud Feedback Model Intercomparison Project Observational Simulator Package: Version 2 journal January 2018
Technical Note: On the use of nudging for aerosol–climate model intercomparison studies journal January 2014
Investigating multiple aerosol optical depth products from MODIS and VIIRS over Asia: Evaluation, comparison, and merging journal June 2020
The global aerosol–climate model ECHAM6.3–HAM2.3 – Part 1: Aerosol evaluation journal January 2019
Comparison of mineral dust layers vertical structures modeled with CHIMERE-DUST and observed with the CALIOP lidar journal May 2009
How much can the vertical distribution of black carbon affect its global direct radiative forcing?: HOW MUCH DO BC PROFILES AFFECT FORCING? journal October 2010
Comparison of CALIOP level 2 aerosol subtypes to aerosol types derived from AERONET inversion data journal January 2009

Similar Records

Comparison of scattering ratio profiles retrieved from ALADIN/Aeolus and CALIOP/CALIPSO observations and preliminary estimates of cloud fraction profiles
Journal Article · Wed Mar 02 00:00:00 EST 2022 · Atmospheric Measurement Techniques (Online) · OSTI ID:1958925

Understanding processes that control dust spatial distributions with global climate models and satellite observations
Journal Article · Tue Nov 17 00:00:00 EST 2020 · Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (Online) · OSTI ID:1958925

Ship-based Observations and Climate Model Simulations of Cloud Phase over the Southern Ocean
Journal Article · Mon May 08 00:00:00 EDT 2023 · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · OSTI ID:1958925

Related Subjects