Skip to main content
U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Dosimetry and uncertainty approaches for the million person study of low-dose radiation health effects: overview of the recommendations in NCRP Report No. 178

Journal Article · · International Journal of Radiation Biology
 [1];  [2];  [3];  [4];  [5];  [6];  [7];  [6];  [8];  [9];  [10];  [11];  [12];  [13];  [14];  [15];  [16];  [17];  [18]
  1. Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (United States)
  2. National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD (United States)
  3. M.H. Chew and Associates, Oak Ridge, TN (United States)
  4. National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, Inc., Bethesda, MD (United States); Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN (United States)
  5. US Department of Energy (USDOE), New York, NY (United States)
  6. Oak Ridge National Lab. (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States)
  7. Oak Ridge Associated Univ., Oak Ridge, TN (United States)
  8. International Epidemiology Institute, Rockville, MD (United States)
  9. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, USA
  10. Pacific Northwest National Lab. (PNNL), Richland, WA (United States)
  11. National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, Inc., Bethesda, MD (United States)
  12. International Commission on Radiation Units, Bethesda, MD (United States)
  13. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC, USA
  14. University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
  15. US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), Arlington, TX (United States)
  16. Risk Assessment Corporation, Neeses, SC (United States)
  17. Landauer, Inc, Glenwood, IL (United States)
  18. Leidos Innovations Corporation, Houston, TX (United States)
Purpose: Scientific Committee 6–9 was established by the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP), charged to provide guidance in the derivation of organ doses and their uncertainty, and produced a report, NCRP Report No. 178, Deriving Organ Doses and their Uncertainty for Epidemiologic Studies with a focus on the Million Person Study of Low-Dose Radiation Health Effects (MPS). This review summarizes the conclusions and recommendations of NCRP Report No. 178, with a concentration on and overview of the dosimetry and uncertainty approaches for the cohorts in the MPS, along with guidelines regarding the essential approaches used to estimate organ doses and their uncertainties (from external and internal sources) within the framework of an epidemiologic study. Conclusions: The success of the MPS is tied to the validity of the dose reconstruction approaches to provide realistic estimates of organ-specific radiation absorbed doses that are as accurate and precise as possible and to properly evaluate their accompanying uncertainties. Further, the dosimetry aspects for the MPS are challenging in that they address diverse exposure scenarios for diverse occupational groups being studied over a period of up to 70 y. Specific dosimetric reconstruction issues differ among the varied exposed populations that are considered: atomic veterans, U.S. Department of Energy workers exposed to both penetrating radiation and intakes of radionuclides, nuclear power plant workers, medical radiation workers, and industrial radiographers. While a major source of radiation exposure to the study population comes from external gamma- or x-ray sources, for some of the study groups, there is also a meaningful component of radionuclide intakes that requires internal radiation dosimetry assessments.
Research Organization:
Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States)
Sponsoring Organization:
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC); Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA); National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA); US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA); USDOE; USEPA; USNRC
Grant/Contract Number:
AC05-00OR22725; AU0000042; SC0008944
OSTI ID:
1960702
Journal Information:
International Journal of Radiation Biology, Journal Name: International Journal of Radiation Biology Journal Issue: 4 Vol. 98; ISSN 0955-3002
Publisher:
Taylor and FrancisCopyright Statement
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

References (26)

Bayesian dose-response analysis for epidemiological studies with complex uncertainty in dose estimation: Bayesian dose-response analysis for epidemiological studies with complex uncertainty in dose estimation journal September 2015
Conversion Coefficients for Radiological Protection Quantities for External Radiation Exposures journal April 2010
Dosimetry for the study of medical radiation workers with a focus on the mean absorbed dose to the lung, brain and other organs journal January 2019
A Study of Mortality and Morbidity Among Persons Occupationally Exposed to ⩽50 mSv in a Year: Phase I, Mortality Through 1984 journal April 1996
A respiratory model for uranium aluminide based on occupational data journal December 2005
The importance of radiation worker studies journal August 2014
External Radiation Exposure and Mortality in a Cohort of Uranium Processing Workers journal July 2000
Mortality Through 1990 Among White Male Workers at the Los Alamos National Laboratory: Considering Exposures to Plutonium and External Ionizing Radiation journal January 1994
A Comprehensive dose Reconstruction Methodology for Former Rocketdyne/Atomics International Radiation Workers journal January 2006
Dose Reconstruction for the Million Worker Study: Status and Guidelines journal January 2015
Dosimetry is Key to Good Epidemiology: Workers at Mallinckrodt Chemical Works had Seven Different Source Exposures journal January 2018
Radiation Safety Considerations for the Use of 223RaCl2 DE in Men with Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer journal January 2014
Shared Uncertainty in Measurement Error Problems, with Application to Nevada Test Site Fallout Data journal May 2007
Mortality and ionising radiation exposures among workers employed at the Fernald Feed Materials Production Center (1951–1985) journal January 2013
Shared Dosimetry Error in Epidemiological Dose-Response Analyses journal March 2015
The US Transuranium and Uranium Registries: forty years' experience and new directions in the analysis of actinides in human tissues journal September 2011
Power and Uncertainty Analysis of Epidemiological Studies of Radiation-Related Disease Risk in which Dose Estimates are Based on a Complex Dosimetry System: Some Observations journal October 2003
The 15-Country Collaborative Study of Cancer Risk among Radiation Workers in the Nuclear Industry: Study of Errors in Dosimetry journal April 2007
Mortality Among Mound Workers Exposed to Polonium-210 and Other Sources of Radiation, 1944–1979 journal February 2014
Military Participants at U.S. Atmospheric Nuclear Weapons Testing—Methodology for Estimating Dose and Uncertainty journal May 2014
The Two-Dimensional Monte Carlo: A New Methodologic Paradigm for Dose Reconstruction for Epidemiological Studies journal January 2015
Red Bone Marrow and Male Breast Doses for a Cohort of Atomic Veterans journal February 2017
Updated Mortality Analysis of Radiation Workers at Rocketdyne (Atomics International), 1948–2008 journal August 2011
Lung Cancer in Mayak Workers journal November 2004
Mortality among Radiation Workers at Rocketdyne (Atomics International), 1948–1999 journal July 2006
Updated Analyses of Combined Mortality Data for Workers at the Hanford Site, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, and Rocky Flats Weapons Plant journal December 1993

Similar Records

Dose Reconstruction for the Million Worker Study: Status and Guidelines
Journal Article · Sat Jan 31 19:00:00 EST 2015 · Health Physics · OSTI ID:1221454

Using personal monitoring data to derive organ doses for medical radiation workers in the Million Person Study—considerations regarding NCRP Commentary no. 30
Journal Article · Thu Feb 25 23:00:00 EST 2021 · Journal of Radiological Protection · OSTI ID:1848387

Epidemiologic Study of One Million U.S. Radiation Workers and Veterans
Technical Report · Wed Dec 13 23:00:00 EST 2017 · OSTI ID:1413399