Alternating chempolishing and electropolishing for interior and exterior surface finishing of additively manufactured (AM) metal components
Additively manufactured (AM) components’ surface finishing is crucial in adopting them for intended applications in challenging environments involving fatigue, corrosion, high temperature, and nuclear radiation. In our prior research, chempolishing (C) was utilized as an electroless etching process that uniformly smoothens complex AM components’ accessible interior and exterior surfaces (Tyagi et al. Additive Manufacturing, 25:32–38, 22). A wide range of electropolishing (E) has been demonstrated for AM surface finishing. However, electropolishing can impact a surface that can be juxtaposed to counter electrode and can yield a very smooth surface to sub-micrometer level roughness. However, a knowledge gap exists about the impact of applying both approaches on the same surface one after another and what new advantages may arise because of combining two methods. This paper uses dual-stage liquid-based surface finishing strategies produced by alternating the chempolishing (C) and electropolishing (E) steps. Two dual-stage surface finishing approaches, i.e., chempolishing followed by electropolishing (CE) and electropolishing followed by chempolishing (EC), were performed on the 316 stainless AM steel component. Impacts of EC and CE approaches were compared with single-stage C and E surface finishing approaches. An optical microscope and mechanical profilometer were utilized to investigate the wide range of surface roughness parameters. CE and EC produced Ra ~ 1.4 µm and ~ 1.6 µm, respectively. Surface roughness on CE- and EC-treated AM samples was lower than those individually treated by C and E approaches. Scanning electron microscopy provided further insights into the microstructural difference between CE- and EC-treated AM samples. This paper reports a liquid contact angle study on CE- and EC-treated AM samples to provide insights into the relative difference in surface energy that is crucial for making coatings on AM parts. A spectroscopic reflectance study was also employed to register the difference in physical properties of AM components treated with CE and EC approaches. Further, this study reveals industrially practicable interior and exterior surface finishing approaches for complex AM metal components that require minimum tooling and real-time process monitoring.
- Research Organization:
- Kansas City Nuclear Security Campus (KCNSC), Kansas City, MO (United States); University of the District of Columbia, Washington, DC (United States)
- Sponsoring Organization:
- USDOE National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA); National Science Foundation (NSF); National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA)
- Grant/Contract Number:
- NA0002839; FOA-0003945; 80NSSC19M0196; NA0003945
- OSTI ID:
- 1909371
- Alternate ID(s):
- OSTI ID: 2281187
- Report Number(s):
- NSC-614-3043
- Journal Information:
- International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 121, Issue 11-12; ISSN 0268-3768
- Publisher:
- SpringerCopyright Statement
- Country of Publication:
- United States
- Language:
- English
Similar Records
Review of internal and external surface finishing technologies for additively manufactured metallic alloys components and new frontiers
Surface Finishing and Coating Parameters Impact on Additively Manufactured Binder-Jetted Steel–Bronze Composites