skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: NRAP Recommended Practices for Containment Assurance and Leakage Risk Quantification

Technical Report ·
DOI:https://doi.org/10.2172/1906399· OSTI ID:1906399
 [1];  [2];  [3];  [4];  [3];  [1];  [4];  [5];  [5];  [3];  [4];  [5];  [4];  [6];  [7];  [1];  [1]
  1. National Energy Technology Lab. (NETL), Pittsburgh, PA (United States)
  2. Pennsylvania State Univ., University Park, PA (United States); National Energy Technology Lab. (NETL), Pittsburgh, PA (United States)
  3. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), Berkeley, CA (United States)
  4. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL), Richland, WA (United States)
  5. Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL), Los Alamos, NM (United States)
  6. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL), Livermore, CA (United States)
  7. Robert F. Van Voorhees PLLC, Washington, DC (United States); National Energy Technology Lab. (NETL), Pittsburgh, PA (United States)

This report presents recommendations for quantitatively assessing and managing leakage risk and effective containment assurance at geologic carbon storage (GCS) sites, amidst uncertainty in site characteristics and performance. These recommended practices are a product of the U.S. Department of Energy’s (DOE) Office of Fossil Energy and Carbon Management’s National Risk Assessment Partnership (NRAP)—a multi-year collaborative research effort of Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Los Alamos National Laboratory, National Energy Technology Laboratory, and Pacific Northwest National Laboratory. These recommended practices are organized as a set of conceptual workflows that correspond with the stages of the GCS project lifecycle. They consider aspects of site characterization, quantification of potential leakage, assessing the spatial extent of potential environmental impacts, optimizing monitoring design for detection of potential leakage, evaluation of concordance between monitored and forecasted reservoir response, assessing conformance with expected/accepted performance, and determination of the timeline over which risk of impactful leakage can be expected to abate. These conceptual workflows are intended to aid stakeholders in making risk management decisions at GCS sites and to support development of sound, risk-based justifications for characterizing the subsurface, defining area of potential leakage impact, designing site monitoring plans, selecting leakage risk management/mitigation alternatives, and estimating site closure timelines.

Research Organization:
National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL), Pittsburgh, PA, Morgantown, WV, and Albany, OR (United States)
Sponsoring Organization:
USDOE Office of Fossil Energy and Carbon Management (FECM)
DOE Contract Number:
89243318CFE000003
OSTI ID:
1906399
Report Number(s):
DOE/NETL-2022/3344; NRAP-TRS-I-002-2022
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

References (18)

Testing the efficacy of active pressure management as a tool to mitigate induced seismicity journal March 2020
Evaluating probability of containment effectiveness at a GCS site using integrated assessment modeling approach with Bayesian decision network journal March 2021
Probabilistic geomechanical analysis of compartmentalization at the Snøhvit CO 2 sequestration project journal February 2015
Geochemical narrowing of cement fracture aperture during multiphase flow of supercritical CO2 and brine journal April 2020
Improved geophysical monitoring of carbon sequestration through parameter linkage to reservoir modeling journal September 2022
Risk‐based area of review estimation in overpressured reservoirs to support injection well storage facility permit requirements for CO 2 storage projects
  • Burton‐Kelly, Matthew E.; Azzolina, Nicholas A.; Connors, Kevin C.
  • Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Vol. 11, Issue 5 https://doi.org/10.1002/ghg.2098
journal June 2021
Climate Change 2013 – The Physical Science Basis book March 2014
Assessment of relationship between post-injection plume migration and leakage risks at geologic CO2 storage sites journal October 2020
Optimal design of microseismic monitoring network: Synthetic study for the Kimberlina CO2 storage demonstration site journal April 2020
Deep learning inversion of gravity data for detection of CO2 plumes in overlying aquifers journal January 2022
CO2 plume evolution in a depleted natural gas reservoir: Modeling of conformance uncertainty reduction over time journal June 2020
Reducing uncertainty in geologic CO2 sequestration risk assessment by assimilating monitoring data journal March 2020
The State of the Art in Monitoring and Verification: an update five years on journal September 2020
Toward an adaptive monitoring design for leakage risk – Closing the loop of monitoring and modeling journal September 2018
A risk-based framework for Measurement, Monitoring and Verification (MMV) of the Goldeneye storage complex for the Peterhead CCS project, UK journal June 2017
Sensitivity of geophysical techniques for monitoring secondary CO2 storage plumes journal February 2022
Downhole pressure and chemical monitoring for CO2 and brine leak detection in aquifers above a CO2 storage reservoir journal December 2019
The value of perfect and imperfect information in lake monitoring and management journal July 2020