skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: High-throughput screening tools facilitate calculation of a combined exposure-bioactivity index for chemicals with endocrine activity

Journal Article · · Environment International
 [1];  [1];  [2];  [3]
  1. Oak Ridge Inst. for Science and Education (ORISE), Oak Ridge, TN (United States); US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Washington, DC (United States)
  2. Oak Ridge Inst. for Science and Education (ORISE), Oak Ridge, TN (United States); US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Research Triangle Park, NC (United States)
  3. US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Research Triangle Park, NC (United States)

High-throughput and computational tools provide a new opportunity to calculate combined bioactivity of exposure to diverse chemicals acting through a common mechanism. We used high throughput in vitro bioactivity data and exposure predictions from the U.S. EPA’s Toxicity and Exposure Forecaster (ToxCast and ExpoCast) to estimate combined estrogen receptor (ER) agonist activity of non-pharmaceutical chemical exposures for the general U.S. population. High-throughput toxicokinetic (HTTK) data provide conversion factors that relate bioactive concentrations measured in vitro (µM), to predicted population geometric mean exposure rates (mg/kg/day). These data were available for 22 chemicals with ER agonist activity and were estimated for other ER bioactive chemicals based on the geometric mean of HTTK values across chemicals. For each chemical, ER bioactivity across ToxCast assays was compared to predicted population geometric mean exposure at different levels of in vitro potency and model certainty. Dose additivity was assumed in calculating a Combined Exposure-Bioactivity Index (CEBI), the sum of exposure/bioactivity ratios. Combined estrogen bioactivity was also calculated in terms of the percent maximum bioactivity of chemical mixtures in human plasma using a concentration-addition model. Estimated CEBIs vary greatly depending on assumptions used for exposure and bioactivity. In general, CEBI values were <1 when using median of the estimated general population chemical intake rates, while CEBI were ≥1 when using the upper 95th confidence bound for those same intake rates for all chemicals. Concentration-addition model predictions of mixture bioactivity yield comparable results. Based on current in vitro bioactivity data, HTTK methods, and exposure models, combined exposure scenarios sufficient to influence estrogen bioactivity in the general population cannot be ruled out. Future improvements in screening methods and computational models could reduce uncertainty and better inform the potential combined effects of estrogenic chemicals.

Research Organization:
Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education (ORISE), Oak Ridge, TN (United States)
Sponsoring Organization:
USDOE Office of Science (SC); USEPA
Grant/Contract Number:
SC0014664
OSTI ID:
1904995
Journal Information:
Environment International, Vol. 137, Issue C; ISSN 0160-4120
Publisher:
ElsevierCopyright Statement
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

References (42)

Regulatory assessment of chemical mixtures: Requirements, current approaches and future perspectives journal October 2016
httk : R Package for High-Throughput Toxicokinetics journal January 2017
Chemical Risk Assessment: Traditional vs Public Health Perspectives journal July 2017
Modeling the Interaction of Binary and Ternary Mixtures of Estradiol with Bisphenol A and Bisphenol AF in an In Vitro Estrogen-Mediated Transcriptional Activation Assay (T47D-KBluc) journal May 2010
Dispelling urban myths about default uncertainty factors in chemical risk assessment – sufficient protection against mixture effects? journal July 2013
Identification and Prioritization of Relationships between Environmental Stressors and Adverse Human Health Impacts journal November 2015
Evaluation of androgen assay results using a curated Hershberger database journal October 2018
The potential of AOP networks for reproductive and developmental toxicity assay development journal August 2015
Identifying populations sensitive to environmental chemicals by simulating toxicokinetic variability journal September 2017
Generalized Concentration Addition Predicts Joint Effects of Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor Agonists with Partial Agonists and Competitive Antagonists journal May 2010
Estimating Toxicity-Related Biological Pathway Altering Doses for High-Throughput Chemical Risk Assessment journal April 2011
Incorporating High-Throughput Exposure Predictions With Dosimetry-Adjusted In Vitro Bioactivity to Inform Chemical Toxicity Testing journal August 2015
The Next Generation Blueprint of Computational Toxicology at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency journal March 2019
Environmental Chemicals in Pregnant Women in the United States: NHANES 2003–2004 journal June 2011
Differentiating Pathway-Specific From Nonspecific Effects in High-Throughput Toxicity Data: A Foundation for Prioritizing Adverse Outcome Pathway Development journal February 2018
Low dose mixture effects of endocrine disrupters and their implications for regulatory thresholds in chemical risk assessment journal December 2014
High Throughput Heuristics for Prioritizing Human Exposure to Environmental Chemicals journal October 2014
Executive Summary to EDC-2: The Endocrine Society's Second Scientific Statement on Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals journal December 2015
Human variability in hepatic and renal elimination: implications for risk assessment journal January 2007
An Intuitive Approach for Predicting Potential Human Health Risk with the Tox21 10k Library journal September 2017
An Integrated Addition and Interaction Model for Assessing Toxicity of Chemical Mixtures journal July 2005
Reverse dosimetry: interpreting trihalomethanes biomonitoring data using physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling journal November 2006
Toxicokinetic Triage for Environmental Chemicals journal June 2015
T3DB: the toxic exposome database journal November 2014
Biomarkers intersect with the exposome journal June 2012
Complementing the Genome with an "Exposome": The Outstanding Challenge of Environmental Exposure Measurement in Molecular Epidemiology journal August 2005
Incorporating Human Dosimetry and Exposure into High-Throughput In Vitro Toxicity Screening journal July 2010
Integration of Dosimetry, Exposure, and High-Throughput Screening Data in Chemical Toxicity Assessment journal September 2011
Improving the Human Hazard Characterization of Chemicals: A Tox21 Update journal July 2013
Should the scope of human mixture risk assessment span legislative/regulatory silos for chemicals? journal February 2016
Chemical Mixtures: Considering the Evolution of Toxicology and Chemical Assessment journal April 2005
Using exposomics to assess cumulative risks and promote health: Using Exposomics to Assess Cumulative Risks journal October 2015
Biogeographical Analysis of Chemical Co-Occurrence Data to Identify Priorities for Mixtures Research: Biogeographical Analysis of Chemical Co-Occurrence Data journal July 2011
Prediction of Estrogenic Bioactivity of Environmental Chemical Metabolites journal August 2016
Ten Years of Mixing Cocktails: A Review of Combination Effects of Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals journal December 2007
Screening Chemicals for Estrogen Receptor Bioactivity Using a Computational Model journal June 2015
A Method for Identifying Prevalent Chemical Combinations in the U.S. Population journal August 2017
A physiological approach to hepatic drug clearance journal October 1975
Integrated Model of Chemical Perturbations of a Biological Pathway Using 18 In Vitro High-Throughput Screening Assays for the Estrogen Receptor journal August 2015
Steady-State Solutions to PBPK Models and Their Applications to Risk Assessment I: Route-to-Route Extrapolation of Volatile Chemicals journal June 2006
PBPK modelling of inter-individual variability in the pharmacokinetics of environmental chemicals journal December 2010
Application of Adverse Outcome Pathways to U.S. EPA’s Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program journal September 2017