Scholarly publications represent at least two benefits for the study of the scientific community as a social group. First, they attest to some form of relation between scientists (collaborations, mentoring, heritage, …), useful to determine and analyze social subgroups. Second, most of them are recorded in large databases, easily accessible and including a lot of pertinent information, easing the quantitative and qualitative study of the scientific community. Understanding the underlying dynamics driving the creation of knowledge in general, and of scientific publication in particular, can contribute to maintaining a high level of research, by identifying good and bad practices in science. In this article, we aim to advance this understanding by a statistical analysis of publication within peer-reviewed journals. Namely, we show that the distribution of the number of papers published by an author in a given journal is heavy-tailed, but has a lighter tail than a power law. Interestingly, we demonstrate (both analytically and numerically) that such distributions match the result of a modified preferential attachment process, where, on top of a Barabási-Albert process, we take the finite career span of scientists into account.
Delabays, Robin and Tyloo, Melvyn. "Heavy-tailed distribution of the number of papers within scientific journals." Quantitative Science Studies, vol. 3, no. 3, Aug. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00201
Delabays, Robin, & Tyloo, Melvyn (2022). Heavy-tailed distribution of the number of papers within scientific journals. Quantitative Science Studies, 3(3). https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00201
Delabays, Robin, and Tyloo, Melvyn, "Heavy-tailed distribution of the number of papers within scientific journals," Quantitative Science Studies 3, no. 3 (2022), https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00201
@article{osti_1893695,
author = {Delabays, Robin and Tyloo, Melvyn},
title = {Heavy-tailed distribution of the number of papers within scientific journals},
annote = {Scholarly publications represent at least two benefits for the study of the scientific community as a social group. First, they attest to some form of relation between scientists (collaborations, mentoring, heritage, …), useful to determine and analyze social subgroups. Second, most of them are recorded in large databases, easily accessible and including a lot of pertinent information, easing the quantitative and qualitative study of the scientific community. Understanding the underlying dynamics driving the creation of knowledge in general, and of scientific publication in particular, can contribute to maintaining a high level of research, by identifying good and bad practices in science. In this article, we aim to advance this understanding by a statistical analysis of publication within peer-reviewed journals. Namely, we show that the distribution of the number of papers published by an author in a given journal is heavy-tailed, but has a lighter tail than a power law. Interestingly, we demonstrate (both analytically and numerically) that such distributions match the result of a modified preferential attachment process, where, on top of a Barabási-Albert process, we take the finite career span of scientists into account.},
doi = {10.1162/qss\{_}a\{_}00201},
url = {https://www.osti.gov/biblio/1893695},
journal = {Quantitative Science Studies},
issn = {ISSN 2641-3337},
number = {3},
volume = {3},
place = {United States},
publisher = {MIT Press},
year = {2022},
month = {08}}