Skip to main content
U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

An Evolutionary Algorithm to Personalize Stool-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening

Journal Article · · Frontiers in Physiology
 [1];  [2];  [1];  [2];  [1];  [1]
  1. Erasmus University, Rotterdam (Netherlands)
  2. Argonne National Lab. (ANL), Lemont, IL (United States)

Fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) is an established method for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. Measured FIT-concentrations are associated with both present and future risk of CRC, and may be used for personalized screening. However, evaluation of personalized screening is computationally challenging. In this study, a broadly applicable algorithm is presented to efficiently optimize personalized screening policies that prescribe screening intervals and FIT-cutoffs, based on age and FIT-history. We present a mathematical framework for personalized screening policies and a bi-objective evolutionary algorithm that identifies policies with minimal costs and maximal health benefits. The algorithm is combined with an established microsimulation model (MISCAN-Colon), to accurately estimate the costs and benefits of generated policies, without restrictive Markov assumptions. The performance of the algorithm is demonstrated in three experiments. In Experiment 1, a relatively small benchmark problem, the optimal policies were known. The algorithm approached the maximum feasible benefits with a relative difference of 0.007%. Experiment 2 optimized both intervals and cutoffs, Experiment 3 optimized cutoffs only. Optimal policies in both experiments are unknown. Compared to policies recently evaluated for the USPSTF, personalized screening increased health benefits up to 14 and 4.3%, for Experiments 2 and 3, respectively, without adding costs. Generated policies have several features concordant with current screening recommendations. The method presented in this paper is flexible and capable of optimizing personalized screening policies evaluated with computationally-intensive but established simulation models. It can be used to inform screening policies for CRC or other diseases. For CRC, more debate is needed on what features a policy needs to exhibit to make it suitable for implementation in practice.

Research Organization:
Argonne National Lab. (ANL), Lemont, IL (United States)
Sponsoring Organization:
National Institutes of Health (NIH) - National Cancer Institute; USDOE Office of Science (SC)
Grant/Contract Number:
AC02-06CH11357
OSTI ID:
1879441
Journal Information:
Frontiers in Physiology, Journal Name: Frontiers in Physiology Vol. 12; ISSN 1664-042X
Publisher:
Frontiers Media S.A.Copyright Statement
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

References (29)

Recommendations for Conduct, Methodological Practices, and Reporting of Cost-effectiveness Analyses: Second Panel on Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine journal September 2016
Estimation of Benefits, Burden, and Harms of Colorectal Cancer Screening Strategies: Modeling Study for the US Preventive Services Task Force journal June 2016
Screening for Colorectal Cancer: Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force journal May 2021
Colorectal Cancer Screening: An Updated Modeling Study for the US Preventive Services Task Force journal May 2021
Optimizing colorectal cancer screening by race and sex: Microsimulation analysis II to inform the American Cancer Society colorectal cancer screening guideline: Modeling CRC Screening by Race and Sex journal May 2018
The MISCAN-COLON Simulation Model for the Evaluation of Colorectal Cancer Screening journal February 1999
A genetic algorithm tutorial journal June 1994
Real-Time Monitoring of Results During First Year of Dutch Colorectal Cancer Screening Program and Optimization by Altering Fecal Immunochemical Test Cut-Off Levels journal March 2017
Association Between Concentrations of Hemoglobin Determined by Fecal Immunochemical Tests and Long-term Development of Advanced Colorectal Neoplasia journal November 2017
Cost-Effectiveness of Screening Individuals With Cystic Fibrosis for Colorectal Cancer journal December 2017
A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II journal April 2002
Performance metrics in multi-objective optimization conference October 2015
Performance assessment of multiobjective optimizers: an analysis and review journal April 2003
From desktop to Large-Scale Model Exploration with Swift/T conference December 2016
Colorectal cancer screening: a global overview of existing programmes journal June 2015
An Evidence-Based Microsimulation Model for Colorectal Cancer: Validation and Application journal August 2010
What If I Don't Treat My PSA-Detected Prostate Cancer? Answers from Three Natural History Models journal May 2011
Introduction to the Cancer Intervention and Surveillance Modeling Network (CISNET) Breast Cancer Models journal March 2018
Modeling in Colorectal Cancer Screening: Assessing External and Predictive Validity of MISCAN-Colon Microsimulation Model Using NORCCAP Trial Results journal October 2018
Validation of Colorectal Cancer Models on Long-term Outcomes from a Randomized Controlled Trial journal October 2020
Development and Validation of Three Regional Microsimulation Models for Predicting Colorectal Cancer Screening Benefits in Europe journal January 2021
Optimizing Colonoscopy Screening for Colorectal Cancer Prevention and Surveillance journal July 2014
Assessing Dynamic Breast Cancer Screening Policies journal December 2008
OR Forum—A POMDP Approach to Personalize Mammography Screening Decisions journal October 2012
Modeling in Colorectal Cancer Screening: Assessing External and Predictive Validity of MISCAN-Colon Microsimulation Model Using NORCCAP Trial Results collection January 2018
Development and Validation of Three Regional Microsimulation Models for Predicting Colorectal Cancer Screening Benefits in Europe collection January 2021
Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries journal February 2021
Should Colorectal Cancer Screening Be Considered in Elderly Persons Without Previous Screening?: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis journal June 2014
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Lung Cancer Screening in the United States: A Comparative Modeling Study journal November 2019

Similar Records

Optimal Stopping Ages for Colorectal Cancer Screening
Journal Article · Wed Dec 18 19:00:00 EST 2024 · JAMA Network Open · OSTI ID:3006348

Characteristics of a cost-effective blood test for colorectal cancer screening
Journal Article · Thu Jun 06 00:00:00 EDT 2024 · JNCI, Journal of the National Cancer Institute · OSTI ID:2566845

Emulator-Based Bayesian Calibration of the CISNET Colorectal Cancer Models
Journal Article · Mon Jul 01 00:00:00 EDT 2024 · Medical Decision Making · OSTI ID:2566844