Thin film platinum resistive thermometers are conventionally applied for resistance thermometry techniques due to their stability and proven measurement accuracy. Depending upon the required thermometer thickness and temperature measurement, however, performance benefits can be realized through the application of alternative nanometallic thin films. Herein, a comparative experimental analysis is provided on the performance of nanometallic thin film thermometers most relevant to microelectronics and thermal sensing applications: Al, Au, Cu, and Pt. Sensitivity is assessed through the temperature coefficient of resistance, measured over a range of 10–300 K for thicknesses nominally spanning 25–200 nm. In this work, the interplay of electron scattering sources, which give rise to the temperature-dependent TCR properties for each metal, are analyzed in the framework of a Mayadas–Shatzkes based model. Despite the prevalence of evaporated Pt thin film thermometers, Au and Cu films fabricated in a similar manner may provide enhanced sensitivity depending upon thickness. These results may serve as a guide as the movement toward smaller measurement platforms necessitates the use of smaller, thinner metallic resistance thermometers.
Scott, Ethan A., et al. "Comparative analysis of the sensitivity of nanometallic thin film thermometers." Nanotechnology, vol. 33, no. 37, Jun. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6528/ac7650
Scott, Ethan A., Carow, Anna, Pete, Douglas, & Harris, Charles Thomas (2022). Comparative analysis of the sensitivity of nanometallic thin film thermometers. Nanotechnology, 33(37). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6528/ac7650
Scott, Ethan A., Carow, Anna, Pete, Douglas, et al., "Comparative analysis of the sensitivity of nanometallic thin film thermometers," Nanotechnology 33, no. 37 (2022), https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6528/ac7650
@article{osti_1877119,
author = {Scott, Ethan A. and Carow, Anna and Pete, Douglas and Harris, Charles Thomas},
title = {Comparative analysis of the sensitivity of nanometallic thin film thermometers},
annote = {Thin film platinum resistive thermometers are conventionally applied for resistance thermometry techniques due to their stability and proven measurement accuracy. Depending upon the required thermometer thickness and temperature measurement, however, performance benefits can be realized through the application of alternative nanometallic thin films. Herein, a comparative experimental analysis is provided on the performance of nanometallic thin film thermometers most relevant to microelectronics and thermal sensing applications: Al, Au, Cu, and Pt. Sensitivity is assessed through the temperature coefficient of resistance, measured over a range of 10–300 K for thicknesses nominally spanning 25–200 nm. In this work, the interplay of electron scattering sources, which give rise to the temperature-dependent TCR properties for each metal, are analyzed in the framework of a Mayadas–Shatzkes based model. Despite the prevalence of evaporated Pt thin film thermometers, Au and Cu films fabricated in a similar manner may provide enhanced sensitivity depending upon thickness. These results may serve as a guide as the movement toward smaller measurement platforms necessitates the use of smaller, thinner metallic resistance thermometers.},
doi = {10.1088/1361-6528/ac7650},
url = {https://www.osti.gov/biblio/1877119},
journal = {Nanotechnology},
issn = {ISSN 0957-4484},
number = {37},
volume = {33},
place = {United States},
publisher = {IOP Publishing},
year = {2022},
month = {06}}