While experiments and DFT-computations have been the primary means for understanding the chemical and physical properties of crystalline materials, experiments are expensive and DFT-computations are time-consuming and have significant discrepancies against experiments. Currently, predictive modeling based on DFT-computations have provided a rapid screening method for materials candidates for further DFT-computations and experiments; however, such models inherit the large discrepancies from the DFT-based training data. Here, we demonstrate how AI can be leveraged together with DFT to compute materials properties more accurately than DFT itself by focusing on the critical materials science task of predicting “formation energy of a material given its structure and composition”. On an experimental hold-out test set containing 137 entries, AI can predict formation energy from materials structure and composition with a mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.064 eV/atom; comparing this against DFT-computations, we find that AI can significantly outperform DFT computations for the same task (discrepancies of $$>0.076$$ eV/atom) for the first time.
@article{osti_1875973,
author = {Jha, Dipendra and Gupta, Vishu and Liao, Wei-keng and Choudhary, Alok and Agrawal, Ankit},
title = {Moving closer to experimental level materials property prediction using AI},
annote = {Abstract While experiments and DFT-computations have been the primary means for understanding the chemical and physical properties of crystalline materials, experiments are expensive and DFT-computations are time-consuming and have significant discrepancies against experiments. Currently, predictive modeling based on DFT-computations have provided a rapid screening method for materials candidates for further DFT-computations and experiments; however, such models inherit the large discrepancies from the DFT-based training data. Here, we demonstrate how AI can be leveraged together with DFT to compute materials properties more accurately than DFT itself by focusing on the critical materials science task of predicting “formation energy of a material given its structure and composition”. On an experimental hold-out test set containing 137 entries, AI can predict formation energy from materials structure and composition with a mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.064 eV/atom; comparing this against DFT-computations, we find that AI can significantly outperform DFT computations for the same task (discrepancies of $$>0.076$$ > 0.076 eV/atom) for the first time. },
doi = {10.1038/s41598-022-15816-0},
url = {https://www.osti.gov/biblio/1875973},
journal = {Scientific Reports},
issn = {ISSN 2045-2322},
number = {1},
volume = {12},
place = {United Kingdom},
publisher = {Nature Publishing Group},
year = {2022},
month = {07}}
KDD '19: The 25th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, Proceedings of the 25th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mininghttps://doi.org/10.1145/3292500.3330703