Skip to main content
U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Quantum Control Landscapes Beyond the Dipole Approximation: Controllability, Singular Controls, and Resources

Journal Article · · Frontiers in Physics
 [1];  [2];  [3]
  1. Princeton Univ., NJ (United States). Frick Lab.; Princeton Univ., NJ (United States)
  2. Tsinghua Univ., Beijing (China). Dept. of Automation
  3. Princeton Univ., NJ (United States). Frick Lab.

We investigate the control landscapes of closed n-level quantum systems beyond the dipole approximation by including a polarizability term in the Hamiltonian. The latter term is quadratic in the control field. Theoretical analysis of singular controls is presented, which are candidates for producing landscape traps. The results for considering the presence of singular controls are compared to their counterparts in the dipole approximation (i.e., without polarizability). A numerical analysis of the existence of traps in control landscapes for generating unitary transformations beyond the dipole approximation is made upon including the polarizability term. An extensive exploration of these control landscapes is achieved by creating many random Hamiltonians which include terms linear and quadratic in a single control field. The discovered singular controls are all found not to be local optima. This result extends a great body of recent work on typical landscapes of quantum systems where the dipole approximation is made. We further investigate the relationship between the magnitude of the polarizability and the fluence of the control resulting from optimization. It is also shown that including a polarizability term in an otherwise uncontrollable dipole coupled system removes traps from the corresponding control landscape by restoring controllability. We numerically assess the effect of a polarizability term on a known example of a particular three-level Λ-system with a second order trap in its control landscape. It is found that the addition of the polarizability removes the trap from the landscape. The general practical control implications of these simulations are discussed.

Research Organization:
Princeton University, NJ (United States)
Sponsoring Organization:
USDOE Office of Science (SC)
Grant/Contract Number:
FG02-02ER15344
OSTI ID:
1849398
Journal Information:
Frontiers in Physics, Journal Name: Frontiers in Physics Vol. 9; ISSN 2296-424X
Publisher:
Frontiers Research FoundationCopyright Statement
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

References (39)

Stability analysis of discontinuous quantum control systems with dipole and polarizability coupling journal September 2012
Investigations of the Hyperpolarizability in Organic Molecules from Dipolar to Octopolar Systems journal October 1994
Atom dipole interaction model for molecular polarizability. Application to polyatomic molecules and determination of atom polarizabilities journal May 1972
Closing the Loop on Bond Selective Chemistry Using Tailored Strong Field Laser Pulses journal July 2002
Development of an Accurate and Robust Polarizable Molecular Mechanics Force Field from ab Initio Quantum Chemistry journal January 2004
Quantum control of energy flow in light harvesting journal May 2002
Quantum supremacy using a programmable superconducting processor journal October 2019
Femtosecond quantum control of molecular dynamics in the condensed phase journal January 2007
Controllability of quantum mechanical systems by root space decomposition of su(N) journal January 2002
Dynamic homotopy and landscape dynamical set topology in quantum control journal August 2012
Exploring constrained quantum control landscapes journal October 2012
Quantum control landscapes journal October 2007
Complete controllability of finite-level quantum systems journal February 2001
Quantum control design by Lyapunov trajectory tracking for dipole and polarizability coupling journal October 2009
Control landscapes are almost always trap free: a geometric assessment journal April 2017
Control landscapes for a class of non-linear dynamical systems: sufficient conditions for the absence of traps journal July 2018
Reply to comment on ‘control landscapes are almost always trap free: a geometric assessment’ journal November 2018
Comment on ‘Control landscapes are almost always trap free: a geometric assessment’ journal November 2018
Implementing quantum logic gates with gradient ascent pulse engineering: principles and practicalities
  • Rowland, Benjamin; Jones, Jonathan A.
  • Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, Vol. 370, Issue 1976 https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2011.0361
journal October 2012
Error-resistant single-qubit gates with trapped ions journal May 2008
Gradient algorithm applied to laboratory quantum control journal May 2009
Experimental quantum control landscapes: Inherent monotonicity and artificial structure journal July 2009
Reduced phase error through optimized control of a superconducting qubit journal October 2010
Role of controllability in optimizing quantum dynamics journal June 2011
Exploring quantum control landscapes: Topology, features, and optimization scaling journal July 2011
Singularities of quantum control landscapes journal July 2012
Trap-free manipulation in the Landau-Zener system journal November 2012
Searching for quantum optimal control fields in the presence of singular critical points journal July 2014
Optimal Control at the Quantum Speed Limit journal December 2009
Singular Extremals for the Time-Optimal Control of Dissipative Spin 1 2 Particles journal February 2010
Are there Traps in Quantum Control Landscapes? journal March 2011
Comment on “Are There Traps in Quantum Control Landscapes?” journal May 2012
Teaching lasers to control molecules journal March 1992
Quantum Computing by an Optimal Control Algorithm for Unitary Transformations journal October 2002
The Gradient Flow for Control of Closed Quantum Systems journal October 2013
Whither the Future of Controlling Quantum Phenomena? journal May 2000
Coherent control of a qubit is trap-free journal July 2014
A Closer look at Quantum Control Landscapes and Their Implication for Control Optimization journal September 2013
Quantum supremacy using a programmable superconducting processor dataset January 2019

Similar Records

Searching for an optimal control in the presence of saddles on the quantum-mechanical observable landscape
Journal Article · Thu Jun 22 00:00:00 EDT 2017 · Physical Review A · OSTI ID:1535745

Quantum control landscape of bipartite systems
Journal Article · Thu Mar 28 00:00:00 EDT 2019 · Journal of Physics. A, Mathematical and Theoretical · OSTI ID:1609375

Quantum Optimal Control of Single Harmonic Oscillator under Quadratic Controls together with Linear Dipole Polarizability: A Fluctuation Free Expectation Value Dynamical Perspective
Journal Article · Wed Sep 14 00:00:00 EDT 2011 · AIP Conference Proceedings · OSTI ID:21611597