Skip to main content
OSTI.GOVU.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information
U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information
 

Using neural network ensembles to separate ocean biogeochemical and physical drivers of phytoplankton biogeography in Earth system models

Journal Article · · Geoscientific Model Development (Online)
; ;

Abstract. Earth system models (ESMs) are useful tools for predicting and understanding past and future aspects of the climate system. However, the biological and physical parameters used in ESMs can have wide variations in their estimates. Even small changes in these parameters can yield unexpected results without a clear explanation of how a particular outcome was reached. The standard method for estimating ESM sensitivity is to compare spatiotemporal distributions of variables from different runs of a single ESM. However, a potential pitfall of this method is that ESM output could match observational patterns because of compensating errors. For example, if a model predicts overly weak upwelling and low nutrient concentrations, it might compensate for this by allowing phytoplankton to have a high sensitivity to nutrients. Recently, we demonstrated that neural network ensembles (NNEs) are capable of extracting relationships between predictor and target variables within ocean biogeochemical models. Being able to view the relationships between variables, along with spatiotemporal distributions, allows for a more mechanistically based examination of ESM outputs. Here, we investigated whether we could apply NNEs to help us determine why different ESMs produce different spatiotemporal distributions of phytoplankton biomass. We tested this using three cases. The first and second case used different runs of the same ESM, except that the physical circulations differed between them in the first case, while the biological equations differed between them in the second. Our results indicated that the NNEs were capable of extracting the relationships between variables for different runs of a single ESM, allowing us to distinguish between differences due to changes in circulation (which do not change relationships) from changes in biogeochemical formulation (which do change relationships). In the third case, we applied NNEs to two different ESMs. The results of the third case highlighted the capability of NNEs to contrast the apparent relationships of different ESMs and some of the challenges it presents. Although applied specifically to the ocean components of an ESM, our study demonstrates that Earth system modelers can use NNEs to separate the contributions of different components of ESMs. Specifically, this allows modelers to compare the apparent relationships across different ESMs and observational datasets.

Sponsoring Organization:
USDOE
Grant/Contract Number:
SC0019344
OSTI ID:
1846346
Alternate ID(s):
OSTI ID: 1981299
Journal Information:
Geoscientific Model Development (Online), Journal Name: Geoscientific Model Development (Online) Journal Issue: 4 Vol. 15; ISSN 1991-9603
Publisher:
Copernicus GmbHCopyright Statement
Country of Publication:
Germany
Language:
English

References (21)

How does the Redi parameter for mesoscale mixing impact global climate in an Earth System Model? journal July 2014
Complex functionality with minimal computation: Promise and pitfalls of reduced-tracer ocean biogeochemistry models: COMPLEX BIOGEOCHEMISTRY WITH FEW TRACERS journal December 2015
Critical role for mesoscale eddy diffusion in supplying oxygen to hypoxic ocean waters journal October 2013
Model-derived estimates of new production: New results point towards lower values journal January 2001
Deep learning in neural networks: An overview journal January 2015
Empirical and mechanistic models for the particle export ratio: MODELING THE PARTICLE EXPORT RATIO journal December 2005
Sensitivity of simulated extent and future evolution of marine suboxia to mixing intensity: SENSITIVITY OF SUBOXIA TO MIXING INTENSITY journal March 2011
Variations in Ocean Deoxygenation Across Earth System Models: Isolating the Role of Parameterized Lateral Mixing journal June 2019
Mixing of a tracer in the pycnocline journal September 1998
The relative influences of nitrogen and phosphorus on oceanic primary production journal August 1999
Future phytoplankton diversity in a changing climate journal September 2021
Neural network ensembles journal January 1990
GFDL’s ESM2 Global Coupled Climate–Carbon Earth System Models. Part II: Carbon System Formulation and Baseline Simulation Characteristics journal April 2013
Impacts of Shortwave Penetration Depth on Large-Scale Ocean Circulation and Heat Transport journal June 2005
Artificial neural networks as empirical models for estimating phytoplankton production journal January 1996
Dynamic model of phytoplankton growth and acclimation:responses of the balanced growth rate and the chlorophyll a:carbon ratio to light, nutrient-limitation and temperature journal January 1997
Scaling Global Warming Impacts on Ocean Ecosystems: Lessons From a Suite of Earth System Models journal September 2020
Multiple stressors of ocean ecosystems in the 21st century: projections with CMIP5 models journal January 2013
Drivers and uncertainties of future global marine primary production in marine ecosystem models journal January 2015
Can machine learning extract the mechanisms controlling phytoplankton growth from large-scale observations? – A proof-of-concept study journal January 2021
Regional impacts of iron-light colimitation in a global biogeochemical model journal January 2010

Similar Records

How Well do Earth System Models Capture Apparent Relationships Between Phytoplankton Biomass and Environmental Variables?
Journal Article · Sat Jul 01 00:00:00 EDT 2023 · Global Biogeochemical Cycles · OSTI ID:2421172

Related Subjects