Skip to main content
U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Gap Flows Along the Columbia River Observed During the WFIP2 Field Campaign

Technical Report ·
DOI:https://doi.org/10.2172/1844342· OSTI ID:1844342
 [1];  [2];  [1];  [2]
  1. Argonne National Lab. (ANL), Argonne, IL (United States)
  2. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Washington, DC (United States)

Data collected in the Columbia River Gorge and Basin Area during the second Wind Forecasting Improvement Project (WFIP2) was used to study gap flow events in the region. In particular, the relationship between 200 m zonal wind speed and the zonal mesoscale pressure gradient at Troutdale (West of the gorge), Wasco (east of the gorge), and Boardman (farther east of the gorge) sites was examined. An objective criterion was used to identify 169 (Troutdale), 161 (Wasco), and 113 (Boardman) gap flow days that had weak synoptic forcing. The 200 m zonal wind speed exhibited a linear relationship with the zonal pressure gradient at Wasco during both easterly and westerly gap flow days at daily timescales. Such a relationship was only observed during easterly gap flow days at Troutdale and was not observed at Boardman. The zonal wind speed exhibited a diurnal cycle at Wasco and Boardman, with greater changes in the nighttime winds than the daytime winds due to changes in pressure gradient. The root mean square differences (RMSDs) between the observed pressure gradient at Wasco and that simulated by the High Resolution Rapid Refresh (HRRR) model in 3 km (HRRR-3km) and 750 m (HRRR-750m) horizontal resolution were 3.14 hPa and 0.57 hPa, respectively. However, the RMSDs for the 200 m zonal wind speed were 1.40 m s-1 for HRRR-3km and 1.20 m s-1 for HRRR- 750m. Improvement in simulating the zonal pressure gradient accompanied by negligible changes in simulating zonal wind speed due to higher horizontal resolution points to a complex interplay between different components of the model physics when simulating the meteorology. The HRRR-750m resolution model accurately mimicked the observed covariability (phase diagram) between the zonal pressure gradient and the 200 m zonal wind speed during the nighttime, but not during the daytime, suggesting model errors might be related to the representation of boundary layer processes.

Research Organization:
Argonne National Laboratory (ANL), Argonne, IL (United States)
Sponsoring Organization:
USDOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE), Renewable Power Office. Wind Energy Technologies Office; National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)
DOE Contract Number:
AC02-06CH11357
OSTI ID:
1844342
Report Number(s):
ANL-22/15; 173231
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

Similar Records

Lidar-Based Evaluation of HRRR Performance in California’s Diablo Range
Journal Article · Wed Oct 01 00:00:00 EDT 2025 · Weather and Forecasting · OSTI ID:2997829