Skip to main content
U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

A field guide to cultivating computational biology

Journal Article · · PLoS Biology (Online)
 [1];  [2];  [3];  [4];  [5];  [6];  [7];  [8];  [6];  [9];  [10];  [11];  [12];  [13];  [14];  [15]
  1. Massachusetts Inst. of Technology (MIT), Cambridge, MA (United States); Univ. of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO (United States)
  2. Univ. of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO (United States)
  3. RIKEN Center for Sustainable Resource Science, Yokohama (Japan); Human Technopole, Milan (Italy)
  4. Univ. of Campinas (UNICAMP) (Brazil)
  5. RIKEN Center for Sustainable Resource Science, Yokohama (Japan)
  6. Univ. of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA (United States)
  7. Pacific Northwest National Lab. (PNNL), Richland, WA (United States)
  8. Univ. of Melbourne (Australia)
  9. Weill-Cornell Medicine, New York, NY (United States)
  10. New York Genome Center, New York, NY (United States)
  11. Univ. of California, Merced, CA (United States)
  12. Technical Univ. of Munich (Germany)
  13. Univ. of Sydney, NSW (Australia)
  14. Massachusetts Inst. of Technology (MIT), Cambridge, MA (United States)
  15. Johns Hopkins Univ., Baltimore, MD (United States)
Evolving in sync with the computation revolution over the past 30 years, computational biology has emerged as a mature scientific field. While the field has made major contributions toward improving scientific knowledge and human health, individual computational biology practitioners at various institutions often languish in career development. As optimistic biologists passionate about the future of our field, we propose solutions for both eager and reluctant individual scientists, institutions, publishers, funding agencies, and educators to fully embrace computational biology. We believe that in order to pave the way for the next generation of discoveries, we need to improve recognition for computational biologists and better align pathways of career success with pathways of scientific progress. With 10 outlined steps, we call on all adjacent fields to move away from the traditional individual, single-discipline investigator research model and embrace multidisciplinary, data-driven, team science.
Research Organization:
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL), Richland, WA (United States)
Sponsoring Organization:
USDOE
Grant/Contract Number:
AC05-76RL01830
OSTI ID:
1830208
Report Number(s):
PNNL-SA--166678
Journal Information:
PLoS Biology (Online), Journal Name: PLoS Biology (Online) Journal Issue: 10 Vol. 19; ISSN 1545-7885
Publisher:
Public Library of ScienceCopyright Statement
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

References (25)

SLURM: Simple Linux Utility for Resource Management book January 2003
The Availability of Research Data Declines Rapidly with Article Age journal January 2014
The unsung heroes of scientific software journal January 2016
How to support open-source software and stay sane journal July 2019
Will the pandemic permanently alter scientific publishing? journal June 2020
Ten computer codes that transformed science journal January 2021
So you want to be a computational biologist? journal November 2013
Celebrating parasites journal April 2017
Real-world integration of genomic data into the electronic health record: the PennChart Genomics Initiative journal December 2020
Responsible, practical genomic data sharing that accelerates research journal July 2020
The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship journal March 2016
Data Sharing journal January 2016
iBiology: communicating the process of science journal August 2014
The European Bioinformatics Institute in 2020: building a global infrastructure of interconnected data resources for the life sciences journal November 2019
Renaissance minds in 21st century science journal March 2020
The NEUBIAS Gateway: a hub for bioimage analysis methods and materials journal January 2020
Developing open-source software for bioimage analysis: opportunities and challenges journal January 2021
All biology is computational biology journal March 2017
“Antedisciplinary” Science journal January 2005
Ten Simple Rules for Teaching Bioinformatics at the High School Level journal October 2011
Ten simple rules for surviving an interdisciplinary PhD journal May 2017
The development and application of bioinformatics core competencies to improve bioinformatics training and education journal February 2018
Ten simple rules for biologists learning to program journal January 2018
10 simple rules for teaching wet-lab experimentation to computational biology students, i.e., turning computer mice into lab rats journal June 2020
Singularity: Scientific containers for mobility of compute journal May 2017

Similar Records

Systems Biology
Journal Article · Thu Jun 01 00:00:00 EDT 2006 · The Scientist, Vol. 20 No. 6(June 2006 ):52-57 · OSTI ID:891138

Radiation biology workforce in the United States
Journal Article · Thu Jan 26 19:00:00 EST 2023 · Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics · OSTI ID:2470587

UC Merced Center for Computational Biology Final Report
Technical Report · Mon Nov 29 23:00:00 EST 2010 · OSTI ID:993507