Skip to main content
U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

A techno-economic framework for comparing conventionally and additively manufactured parts for geothermal applications

Journal Article · · Journal of Manufacturing Processes
Geothermal reservoir characterization, construction, and operations are technology-intensive activities that contribute significantly to the cost of delivering renewable electricity. The technologies involved, such as downhole tools and drilling equipment, are similar to those used in oil and gas exploration and production must often be adapted for use in the corrosive, high-temperature geothermal reservoir environment. Low production volume of geothermal tools presents a major challenge in meeting the industry's technology needs. Production of specialized tools for geothermal subsurface applications is often cost-prohibitive. Reduced inventory of subsurface well construction, characterization, and production tools causes geothermal reservoir development efficiency and sophistication to lag behind that of the oil and gas industry. Advances in additive manufacturing provide opportunities to advance geothermal technology while reducing lead time and costs associated with production of low-volume, complex parts. Additionally, this paper performs an initial techno-economic analysis comparing the cost of conventional production techniques and additive manufacturing for geothermal downhole applications. An analysis of representative downhole tools is used to create a framework for estimating fabrication costs of subtractive and additive techniques, including post-print machining required to meet final tolerances. The framework is used to explore several manufacturing scenarios and identify the dominant factors driving manufacturing time and cost. The current feasibility of additive manufacturing for geothermal downhole tool applications is assessed and issues for future development to better meet the needs of the geothermal industry are identified.
Research Organization:
Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States)
Sponsoring Organization:
USDOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)
Grant/Contract Number:
AC05-00OR22725
OSTI ID:
1830138
Alternate ID(s):
OSTI ID: 1868840
Journal Information:
Journal of Manufacturing Processes, Journal Name: Journal of Manufacturing Processes Journal Issue: 12 Vol. 72; ISSN 1526-6125
Publisher:
Society of Manufacturing Engineers; ElsevierCopyright Statement
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

References (9)

Why manufacturers adopt additive manufacturing technologies: The role of sustainability journal June 2019
Understanding the sustainability potential of part consolidation design supported by additive manufacturing journal September 2019
Technology selection in green supply chains - the effects of additive and traditional manufacturing journal February 2021
The Additive Manufacturing (AM) of titanium alloys journal March 2017
Current challenges and potential directions towards precision microscale additive manufacturing – Part IV: Future perspectives journal March 2021
A comparison of traditional manufacturing vs additive manufacturing, the best method for the job journal January 2019
Comparison of geothermal with solar and wind power generation systems journal February 2015
A review on additive manufacturing and its way into the oil and gas industry journal January 2018
Additive Manufacturing for the Aircraft Industry: A Review journal January 2019