The impacts of building characteristics, social psychological and cultural factors on indoor environment quality productivity belief

Chen, Chien-Fei; Yilmaz, Selin; Pisello, Anna Laura; De Simone, Marilena; Kim, Amy; Hong, Tianzhen; Bandurski, Karol; Bavaresco, Mateus V.; Liu, Pei-Ling; Zhu, Yimin

doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.107189

The impacts of building characteristics, social psychological and cultural factors on indoor environment quality productivity belief

Journal Article · Thu Aug 20 04:00:00 EDT 2020 · Building and Environment

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.107189· OSTI ID:1828336

Chen, Chien-Fei ^[1]; Yilmaz, Selin ^[2]; Pisello, Anna Laura ^[3]; De Simone, Marilena ^[4]; Kim, Amy ^[5]; Hong, Tianzhen ^[6]; Bandurski, Karol ^[7]; ^[8]; Liu, Pei-Ling ^[9]; ^[10]

Univ. of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN (United States)
Univ. of Geneva (Switzerland)
Univ. of Perugia (Italy)
Univ. of Calabria (Italy)
Univ. of Washington, Seattle, WA (United States)
Lawrence Berkeley National Lab. (LBNL), Berkeley, CA (United States)
Poznan Univ. of Technology (Poland)
Federal Univ. of Santa Catarina (Brazil)
National Taiwan Univ., Taipei (Taiwan)
Louisiana State Univ., Baton Rouge, LA (United States)

Indoor environmental quality (IEQ) plays a key role in determining occupants' productivity at work; however, analyses of the interconnected factors among building physical, attitudinal, social and demographic components in one study are lacking. To fill this research gap, this study investigates these interconnected factors' influence on occupants’ IEQ-productivity belief, defined as a personal, subjective evaluation of the linkage between the impacts of five IEQ aspects (the quality of indoor temperature, air, natural and electric lighting, and acoustics) and productivity. A cross-sectional survey data was collected in university offices from six countries (Brazil, Italy, Poland, Switzerland, Taiwan and the U.S.). Results of multiple linear regression models indicate that IEQ satisfaction is the strongest positive predictor of the IEQ-productivity belief and this relationship is stronger in private offices. Country of residence is the second primary predictor. Several attitudinal-behavioral factors, including thermal comfort, perceived ease of controlling indoor environmental features, and attitudes toward sharing controls are all positively associated with IEQ-productivity belief. Interestingly, the level of control accessibility to light switches has the strongest impact as opposed to other controls. On the other hand, group norms and conformity intention are not significant predictors. Regarding demographics, men are more likely than women to perceive the IEQs to have positive impacts on their productivity, without considering other variables in the regression model; however, women are more likely than men to consider all IEQs as having positive impacts on productivity, after considering other variables. Furthermore, our findings provide suggestions for prioritizing wellness in the workplace since the early design stage.

View Accepted Manuscript (DOE)

Research Organization:: Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), Berkeley, CA (United States)

Sponsoring Organization:: USDOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE), Energy Efficiency Office. Building Technologies Office

Grant/Contract Number:: AC02-05CH11231

OSTI ID:: 1828336

Alternate ID(s):: OSTI ID: 1660312

Journal Information:: Building and Environment, Journal Name: Building and Environment Vol. 185; ISSN 0360-1323

Publisher:: ElsevierCopyright Statement

Country of Publication:: United States

Language:: English

References (83)

Influences of culture and environmental attitude on thermal, emotional and perceptual evaluations of a public square Knez, Igor; Thorsson, Sofia International Journal of Biometeorology, Vol. 50, Issue 5 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-006-0024-0	journal	March 2006
The theory of planned behavior Ajzen, Icek Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 50, Issue 2 https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T	journal	December 1991
Tolerated noise levels in the U.K. and Pakistan and simultaneous thermal comfort Wilson, M.; Nicol, J. F. Renewable Energy, Vol. 5, Issue 5-8 https://doi.org/10.1016/0960-1481(94)90126-0	journal	August 1994
Effects of unattended speech on performance and subjective distraction: The role of acoustic design in open-plan offices Haapakangas, Annu; Hongisto, Valtteri; Hyönä, Jukka Applied Acoustics, Vol. 86 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2014.04.018	journal	December 2014
Understanding electricity consumption: A comparative contribution of building factors, socio-demographics, appliances, behaviours and attitudes Huebner, Gesche; Shipworth, David; Hamilton, Ian Applied Energy, Vol. 177 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.04.075	journal	September 2016
The effects of air temperature on office workers’ well-being, workload and productivity-evaluated with subjective ratings Lan, Li; Lian, Zhiwei; Pan, Li Applied Ergonomics, Vol. 42, Issue 1 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2010.04.003	journal	December 2010
A longitudinal investigation of work environment stressors on the performance and wellbeing of office workers Lamb, S.; Kwok, K. C. S. Applied Ergonomics, Vol. 52 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2015.07.010	journal	January 2016
User problems with individual temperature control in offices Karjalainen, Sami; Koistinen, Olavi Building and Environment, Vol. 42, Issue 8 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2006.10.031	journal	August 2007
Thermal comfort and productivity - Evaluation of workplace environment in a task conditioned office Akimoto, Takashi; Tanabe, Shin-ichi; Yanai, Takashi Building and Environment, Vol. 45, Issue 1 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2009.06.022	journal	January 2010
Office layout affecting privacy, interaction, and acoustic quality in LEED-certified buildings Lee, Young S. Building and Environment, Vol. 45, Issue 7 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2010.01.007	journal	July 2010
Comfort of workers in office buildings: The European HOPE project Bluyssen, Philomena M.; Aries, Myriam; van Dommelen, Paula Building and Environment, Vol. 46, Issue 1 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2010.07.024	journal	January 2011
A study on the effects of thermal, luminous, and acoustic environments on indoor environmental comfort in offices Huang, Li; Zhu, Yingxin; Ouyang, Qin Building and Environment, Vol. 49 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2011.07.022	journal	March 2012
Nonlinear relationships between individual IEQ factors and overall workspace satisfaction Kim, Jungsoo; de Dear, Richard Building and Environment, Vol. 49 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2011.09.022	journal	March 2012
Towards productivity indicators for performance-based façade design in commercial buildings Jin, Q.; Overend, M.; Thompson, P. Building and Environment, Vol. 57 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2012.05.009	journal	November 2012
Occupants' window opening behaviour: A literature review of factors influencing occupant behaviour and models Fabi, Valentina; Andersen, Rune Vinther; Corgnati, Stefano Building and Environment, Vol. 58 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2012.07.009	journal	December 2012
Modeling thermal comfort holistically: Bayesian estimation of thermal sensation, acceptability, and preference distributions for office building occupants Langevin, Jared; Wen, Jin; Gurian, Patrick L. Building and Environment, Vol. 69 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2013.07.017	journal	November 2013
Influence of factors unrelated to environmental quality on occupant satisfaction in LEED and non-LEED certified buildings Schiavon, Stefano; Altomonte, Sergio Building and Environment, Vol. 77 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2014.03.028	journal	July 2014
Comfort and performance impact of personal control over thermal environment in summer: Results from a laboratory study Boerstra, Atze C.; Kulve, Marije te; Toftum, Jørn Building and Environment, Vol. 87 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2014.12.022	journal	May 2015
Workplace productivity and individual thermal satisfaction Tanabe, Shin-ichi; Haneda, Masaoki; Nishihara, Naoe Building and Environment, Vol. 91 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.02.032	journal	September 2015
Occupant interactions with shading and lighting systems using different control interfaces: A pilot field study Sadeghi, Seyed Amir; Karava, Panagiota; Konstantzos, Iason Building and Environment, Vol. 97 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.12.008	journal	February 2016
Desk ownership in the workplace: The effect of non-territorial working on employee workplace satisfaction, perceived productivity and health Kim, Jungsoo; Candido, Christhina; Thomas, Leena Building and Environment, Vol. 103 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.04.015	journal	July 2016
Occupant productivity and office indoor environment quality: A review of the literature Al Horr, Yousef; Arif, Mohammed; Kaushik, Amit Building and Environment, Vol. 105 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.06.001	journal	August 2016
Ten questions concerning occupant behavior in buildings: The big picture Hong, Tianzhen; Yan, Da; D'Oca, Simona Building and Environment, Vol. 114 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.12.006	journal	March 2017
A comparison of winter indoor thermal environment and thermal comfort between regions in Europe, North America, and Asia Zhang, Nan; Cao, Bin; Wang, Zhaojun Building and Environment, Vol. 117 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2017.03.006	journal	May 2017
The impact of thermal environment on occupant IEQ perception and productivity Geng, Yang; Ji, Wenjie; Lin, Borong Building and Environment, Vol. 121 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2017.05.022	journal	August 2017
The impact of indoor environmental quality on work productivity in university open-plan research offices Kang, Shengxian; Ou, Dayi; Mak, Cheuk Ming Building and Environment, Vol. 124 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2017.07.003	journal	November 2017
Luminance and vertical eye illuminance thresholds for occupants’ visual comfort in daylit office environments Suk, Jae Yong Building and Environment, Vol. 148 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.10.058	journal	January 2019
A comparative field study of indoor environmental quality in two types of open-plan offices: Open-plan administrative offices and open-plan research offices Lou, Huading; Ou, Dayi Building and Environment, Vol. 148 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.11.022	journal	January 2019
Interactions and comprehensive effect of indoor environmental quality factors on occupant satisfaction Tang, Hao; Ding, Yong; Singer, Brett Building and Environment, Vol. 167 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.106462	journal	January 2020
Review of multi‐domain approaches to indoor environmental perception and behaviour Schweiker, Marcel; Ampatzi, Eleni; Andargie, Maedot S. Building and Environment, Vol. 176 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.106804	journal	June 2020
Assessing occupants’ personal attributes in relation to human perception of environmental comfort: Measurement procedure and data analysis Pigliautile, Ilaria; Casaccia, Sara; Morresi, Nicole Building and Environment, Vol. 177 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.106901	journal	June 2020
Occupant preferences and satisfaction with the luminous environment and control systems in daylit offices: a literature review Galasiu, Anca D.; Veitch, Jennifer A. Energy and Buildings, Vol. 38, Issue 7 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2006.03.001	journal	July 2006
Network synergy effect: Establishing a synergy between building network and peer network energy conservation effects Xu, Xiaoqi; Taylor, John E.; Pisello, Anna Laura Energy and Buildings, Vol. 68 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2013.09.017	journal	January 2014
User satisfaction and well-being in energy efficient office buildings: Evidence from cutting-edge projects in Austria Ornetzeder, Michael; Wicher, Magdalena; Suschek-Berger, Jürgen Energy and Buildings, Vol. 118 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.02.036	journal	April 2016
Integrated optimization of energy costs and occupants’ productivity in commercial buildings Mofidi, Farhad; Akbari, Hashem Energy and Buildings, Vol. 129 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.07.059	journal	October 2016
How subjective and non-physical parameters affect occupants’ environmental comfort perception Castaldo, Veronica Lucia; Pigliautile, Ilaria; Rosso, Federica Energy and Buildings, Vol. 178 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.08.020	journal	November 2018
Technological innovations to assess and include the human dimension in the building-performance loop: A review Bavaresco, Mateus Vinícius; D'Oca, Simona; Ghisi, Enedir Energy and Buildings, Vol. 202 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2019.109365	journal	November 2019
Methods used in social sciences that suit energy research: A literature review on qualitative methods to assess the human dimension of energy use in buildings Bavaresco, Mateus V.; D'Oca, Simona; Ghisi, Enedir Energy and Buildings, Vol. 209 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2019.109702	journal	February 2020
Individual and household interactions with energy systems: Toward integrated understanding Stern, Paul C. Energy Research & Social Science, Vol. 1 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2014.03.003	journal	March 2014
Energy at work: Social psychological factors affecting energy conservation intentions within Chinese electric power companies Chen, Chien-fei; Knight, Kyle Energy Research & Social Science, Vol. 4 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2014.08.004	journal	December 2014
Investigating willingness to save energy and communication about energy use in the American workplace with the attitude-behavior-context model Xu, Xiaojing; Maki, Alexander; Chen, Chien-fei Energy Research & Social Science, Vol. 32 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.02.011	journal	October 2017
Synthesizing building physics with social psychology: An interdisciplinary framework for context and occupant behavior in office buildings D’Oca, Simona; Chen, Chien-Fei; Hong, Tianzhen Energy Research & Social Science, Vol. 34 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.08.002	journal	December 2017
Reflections on a retrofit: Organizational commitment, perceived productivity and controllability in a building lighting project in the United States McCunn, Lindsay J.; Kim, Amy; Feracor, James Energy Research & Social Science, Vol. 38 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.02.002	journal	April 2018
Understanding energy-saving behaviors in the American workplace: A unified theory of motivation, opportunity, and ability Li, Da; Xu, Xiaojing; Chen, Chien-fei Energy Research & Social Science, Vol. 51 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2019.01.020	journal	May 2019
Culture, conformity, and carbon? A multi-country analysis of heating and cooling practices in office buildings Chen, Chien-fei; Hong, Tianzhen; de Rubens, Gerardo Zarazua Energy Research & Social Science, Vol. 61 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2019.101344	journal	March 2020
The Next Generation of Social Products Based on Sensing, Smart and Sustainable (S3) Features: A Smart Thermostat as Case Study Ponce, Pedro; Meier, Alan; Miranda, Jhonattan IFAC-PapersOnLine, Vol. 52, Issue 13 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2019.11.564	journal	January 2019
Simple and multiple linear regression: sample size considerations Hanley, James A. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, Vol. 79 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.05.014	journal	November 2016
Effects of control over office workspace on perceptions of the work environment and work outcomes Lee, So Young; Brand, Jay L. Journal of Environmental Psychology, Vol. 25, Issue 3 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2005.08.001	journal	September 2005
A model of satisfaction with open-plan office conditions: COPE field findings Veitch, Jennifer A.; Charles, Kate E.; Farley, Kelly M. J. Journal of Environmental Psychology, Vol. 27, Issue 3 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2007.04.002	journal	September 2007
Simultaneous effects of irrelevant speech, temperature and ventilation rate on performance and satisfaction in open-plan offices Varjo, Johanna; Hongisto, Valtteri; Haapakangas, Annu Journal of Environmental Psychology, Vol. 44 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.08.001	journal	December 2015
The moderating role of individual differences in responses to benefit and temporal framing of messages promoting residential energy saving Xu, Xiaojing; Arpan, Laura M.; Chen, Chien-fei Journal of Environmental Psychology, Vol. 44 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.09.004	journal	December 2015
Building value proposition for interactive lighting systems in the workplace: Combining energy and occupant perspectives Kim, Amy A.; Wang, Shuoqi; McCunn, Lindsay J. Journal of Building Engineering, Vol. 24 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2019.100752	journal	July 2019
When choice is demotivating: Can one desire too much of a good thing? Iyengar, Sheena S.; Lepper, Mark R. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 79, Issue 6 https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.79.6.995	journal	December 2000
Maximizing versus satisficing: Happiness is a matter of choice. Schwartz, Barry; Ward, Andrew; Monterosso, John Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 83, Issue 5 https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.83.5.1178	journal	November 2002
The National Human Activity Pattern Survey (NHAPS): a resource for assessing exposure to environmental pollutants Klepeis, Neil E.; Nelson, William C.; Ott, Wayne R. Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology, Vol. 11, Issue 3 https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jea.7500165	journal	July 2001
Impact of available and perceived control on comfort and health in European offices Boerstra, Atze; Beuker, Tim; Loomans, Marcel Architectural Science Review, Vol. 56, Issue 1 https://doi.org/10.1080/00038628.2012.744298	journal	February 2013
Effects of hot and cold temperature exposure on performance: a meta-analytic review Pilcher, June J.; Nadler, Eric; Busch, Caroline Ergonomics, Vol. 45, Issue 10 https://doi.org/10.1080/00140130210158419	journal	August 2002
The effect of office concepts on worker health and performance: a systematic review of the literature De Croon, Einar; Sluiter, Judith; Kuijer, P. Paul Ergonomics, Vol. 48, Issue 2 https://doi.org/10.1080/00140130512331319409	journal	February 2005
Can personal control over the physical environment ease distractions in office workplaces? Lee, So Young; Brand, J. L. Ergonomics, Vol. 53, Issue 3 https://doi.org/10.1080/00140130903389019	journal	February 2010
Second-Level Post-Occupancy Evaluation Analysis Collins, Belinda L.; Fisher, Will; Gillette, Gary Journal of the Illuminating Engineering Society, Vol. 19, Issue 2 https://doi.org/10.1080/00994480.1990.10747961	journal	July 1990
Collaborative knowledge work environments Heerwagen, Judith H.; Kampschroer, Kevin; Powell, Kevin M. Building Research & Information, Vol. 32, Issue 6 https://doi.org/10.1080/09613210412331313025	journal	November 2004
Perceived control in indoor environments: a conceptual approach Hellwig, Runa Tabea Building Research & Information, Vol. 43, Issue 3 https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2015.1004150	journal	February 2015
Rethinking thermal comfort Nicol, J. Fergus; Roaf, Susan Building Research & Information, Vol. 45, Issue 7 https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2017.1301698	journal	March 2017
Impact of occupants’ demographics on indoor environmental quality satisfaction in the workplace Bae, Suyeon; Asojo, Abimbola O.; Martin, Caren S. Building Research & Information, Vol. 48, Issue 3 https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2019.1627857	journal	June 2019
The Influence of Consumer Value-Based Factors on Attitude-Behavioral Intention in Social Commerce: The Differences between High- and Low-Technology Experience Groups Kim, Sung-Bum; Sun, Kyung-A; Kim, Dae-Young Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, Vol. 30, Issue 1-2 https://doi.org/10.1080/10548408.2013.751249	journal	January 2013
Some Quantitative Relations between Indoor Environmental Quality and Work Performance or Health Seppanen, Olli; Fisk, William HVAC&R Research, Vol. 12, Issue 4 https://doi.org/10.1080/10789669.2006.10391446	journal	October 2006
The Combined Effects of Many Different Indoor Environmental Factors on Acceptability and Office Work Performance Clausen, Geo; Wyon, David HVAC&R Research, Vol. 14, Issue 1 https://doi.org/10.1080/10789669.2008.10390996	journal	January 2008
The impact of the ‘open’ workspace on human collaboration Bernstein, Ethan S.; Turban, Stephen Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, Vol. 373, Issue 1753 https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2017.0239	journal	July 2018
Architecture, space and information in constructions built by humans and social insects: a conceptual review Ireland, Tim; Garnier, Simon Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, Vol. 373, Issue 1753 https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2017.0244	journal	July 2018
Facilities management: a behavioural approach Fleming, David Facilities, Vol. 22, Issue 1/2 https://doi.org/10.1108/02632770410517933	journal	January 2004
Office productivity: a theoretical framework Haynes, Barry P. Journal of Corporate Real Estate, Vol. 9, Issue 2 https://doi.org/10.1108/14630010710828108	journal	May 2007
The impact of the behavioural environment on office productivity Haynes, Barry P. Journal of Facilities Management, Vol. 5, Issue 3 https://doi.org/10.1108/14725960710775045	journal	July 2007
The effects of indoor air quality on performance and productivity: The effects of IAQ on performance and productivity Wyon, D. P. Indoor Air, Vol. 14 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0668.2004.00278.x	journal	August 2004
Indoor climate, psychosocial work environment and symptoms in open-plan offices Pejtersen, J.; Allermann, L.; Kristensen, T. S. Indoor Air, Vol. 16, Issue 5 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0668.2006.00444.x	journal	October 2006
Quantitative relationships between occupant satisfaction and satisfaction aspects of indoor environmental quality and building design: Indoor environmental quality Frontczak, M.; Schiavon, S.; Goins, J. Indoor Air, Vol. 22, Issue 2 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0668.2011.00745.x	journal	October 2011
Conceptualizing and testing formative constructs: tutorial and annotated example Roberts, Nicholas; Thatcher, Jason ACM SIGMIS Database: the DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems, Vol. 40, Issue 3 https://doi.org/10.1145/1592401.1592405	journal	July 2009
Influences on Attitude-Behavior Relationships: A Natural Experiment with Curbside Recycling Guagnano, Gregory A.; Stern, Paul C.; Dietz, Thomas Environment and Behavior, Vol. 27, Issue 5 https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916595275005	journal	September 1995
Entrainment of the Human Circadian System by Light Duffy, Jeanne F.; Wright, Kenneth P. Journal of Biological Rhythms, Vol. 20, Issue 4 https://doi.org/10.1177/0748730405277983	journal	August 2005
Perceived Importance of the Quality of the Indoor Environment in Commercial Buildings Lai, Joseph H. K.; Yik, Francis W. H. Indoor and Built Environment, Vol. 16, Issue 4 https://doi.org/10.1177/1420326X07080463	journal	August 2007
Effects of realistic office daylighting and electric lighting conditions on visual comfort, alertness and mood Borisuit, A.; Linhart, F.; Scartezzini, J-L Lighting Research & Technology, Vol. 47, Issue 2 https://doi.org/10.1177/1477153514531518	journal	April 2014
Latent Variable Regression: A Technique for Estimating Interaction and Quadratic Coefficients Ping Jr., Robert A. Multivariate Behavioral Research, Vol. 31, Issue 1 https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr3101_6	journal	January 1996
A Healthy, Energy-Efficient and Comfortable Indoor Environment, a Review Šujanová, Paulína; Rychtáriková, Monika; Sotto Mayor, Tiago Energies, Vol. 12, Issue 8 https://doi.org/10.3390/en12081414	journal	April 2019
Perceived Indoor Environment and Occupants’ Comfort in European “Modern” Office Buildings: The OFFICAIR Study Sakellaris, Ioannis; Saraga, Dikaia; Mandin, Corinne International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Vol. 13, Issue 5 https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph13050444	journal	April 2016

Similar Records

Meta‐Analysis and Regression Modeling of the Impacts of Four Indoor Environmental Quality Metrics on Office Performance

Journal Article · Fri Apr 18 00:00:00 EDT 2025 · Indoor Air · OSTI ID:2562968

Related Subjects

99 GENERAL AND MISCELLANEOUS
Building characteristics
Building controls
Indoor environment quality (IEQ)
Office type
Social-psychological factors
Work productivity

The impacts of building characteristics, social psychological and cultural factors on indoor environment quality productivity belief

Citation Formats

References (83)

Similar Records

Related Subjects