Regional trends and drivers of the global methane budget
- Global Carbon Project CSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere Aspendale Victoria Australia, Global Carbon Project CSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere Canberra ACT Australia
- Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l’Environnement, LSCE‐IPSL (CEA‐CNRS‐UVSQ) Université Paris‐Saclay Gif‐sur‐Yvette France
- NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Biospheric Science Laboratory Greenbelt Maryland USA
- Department of Earth System Science Woods Institute for the Environment, and Precourt Institute for Energy Stanford University Stanford California USA
- Department of Geoscience, Environment and Society ‐ BGEOSYS Université Libre de Bruxelles Brussels Belgium
- Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l’Environnement, LSCE‐IPSL (CEA‐CNRS‐UVSQ) Université Paris‐Saclay Gif‐sur‐Yvette France, Department of Geoscience, Environment and Society ‐ BGEOSYS Université Libre de Bruxelles Brussels Belgium, Université Paris‐Saclay INRAE AgroParisTech UMR ECOSYS Thiverval‐Grignon France
- Yale School of the Environment Yale University New Haven Connecticut USA
- Department of Geography Texas A&,M University College Station Texas USA
- Research Institute for Global Change JAMSTEC Yokohama Japan, Center for Environmental Remote Sensing Chiba University Chiba Japan
- European Commission Joint Research Centre Ispra Italy
- Center for Global Environmental Research National Institute for Environmental Studies (NIES) Tsukuba Japan
- Department of Physical Geography and Ecosystem Science Lund University Lund Sweden, Centre for Environmental and Climate Science Lund University Lund Sweden
- Max Planck Institute for Meteorology Hamburg Germany
- Research Department European Centre for Medium‐Range Weather Forecasts Reading UK
- Climate Research Division Environment and Climate Change Canada Victoria British Columbia Canada
- Climate and Environmental Physics Physics Institute and Oeschger Centre for Climate Change Research University of Bern Bern Switzerland
- Climate and Ecosystem Sciences Division Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Berkeley California USA
- Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research (TNO) Utrecht The Netherlands
- International Center for Climate and Global Change Research School of Forestry and Wildlife Sciences Auburn University Auburn Alabama USA
- Finnish Meteorological Institute Helsinki Finland
- Division of Geophysical and Planetary Science California Institute of Technology Pasadena California USA
- Department of Geographical Sciences University of Maryland College Park Maryland USA
- Department of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences Purdue University West Lafayette Indiana USA
Abstract The ongoing development of the Global Carbon Project (GCP) global methane (CH 4 ) budget shows a continuation of increasing CH 4 emissions and CH 4 accumulation in the atmosphere during 2000–2017. Here, we decompose the global budget into 19 regions (18 land and 1 oceanic) and five key source sectors to spatially attribute the observed global trends. A comparison of top‐down (TD) (atmospheric and transport model‐based) and bottom‐up (BU) (inventory‐ and process model‐based) CH 4 emission estimates demonstrates robust temporal trends with CH 4 emissions increasing in 16 of the 19 regions. Five regions—China, Southeast Asia, USA, South Asia, and Brazil—account for >40% of the global total emissions (their anthropogenic and natural sources together totaling >270 Tg CH 4 yr −1 in 2008–2017). Two of these regions, China and South Asia, emit predominantly anthropogenic emissions (>75%) and together emit more than 25% of global anthropogenic emissions. China and the Middle East show the largest increases in total emission rates over the 2000 to 2017 period with regional emissions increasing by >20%. In contrast, Europe and Korea and Japan show a steady decline in CH 4 emission rates, with total emissions decreasing by ~10% between 2000 and 2017. Coal mining, waste (predominantly solid waste disposal) and livestock (especially enteric fermentation) are dominant drivers of observed emissions increases while declines appear driven by a combination of waste and fossil emission reductions. As such, together these sectors present the greatest risks of further increasing the atmospheric CH 4 burden and the greatest opportunities for greenhouse gas abatement.
- Research Organization:
- Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), Berkeley, CA (United States)
- Sponsoring Organization:
- USDOE; USDOE Office of Science (SC), Biological and Environmental Research (BER). Earth and Environmental Systems Science Division; Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation; Environmental Restoration and Conservation Agency of Japan; Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF); European Commission (EC); European Research Council (ERC)
- Grant/Contract Number:
- DE‐AC02‐05CH11231; AC02-05CH11231; GBMF5439; JPMEERF20182002; JPMEERF20172001; 200020_172476; 776810; CAMS73
- OSTI ID:
- 1828097
- Alternate ID(s):
- OSTI ID: 1828098; OSTI ID: 1896468
- Journal Information:
- Global Change Biology, Journal Name: Global Change Biology Vol. 28 Journal Issue: 1; ISSN 1354-1013
- Publisher:
- Wiley-BlackwellCopyright Statement
- Country of Publication:
- United Kingdom
- Language:
- English
Similar Records
A comprehensive and synthetic dataset for global, regional, and national greenhouse gas emissions by sector 1970–2018 with an extension to 2019
Biomass burning in Asia : annual and seasonal estimates and atmospheric emissions.