Bioenergy for climate change mitigation: Scale and sustainability

Calvin, Katherine; Cowie, Annette; Berndes, Göran; Arneth, Almut; Cherubini, Francesco; Portugal‐Pereira, Joana; Grassi, Giacomo; House, Jo; Johnson, Francis X.; Popp, Alexander; Rounsevell, Mark; Slade, Raphael; Smith, Pete

doi:10.1111/gcbb.12863

Bioenergy for climate change mitigation: Scale and sustainability

Journal Article · Sat Jul 10 00:00:00 EDT 2021 · Global Change Biology. Bioenergy

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12863· OSTI ID:1819932

^[1]; ^[2]; Berndes, Göran ^[3]; Arneth, Almut ^[4]; Cherubini, Francesco ^[5]; Portugal‐Pereira, Joana ^[6]; Grassi, Giacomo ^[7]; House, Jo ^[8]; ^[9]; Popp, Alexander ^[10]; Rounsevell, Mark ^[11]; Slade, Raphael ^[12]; ^[13]

Pacific Northwest National Lab. (PNNL), Richland, WA (United States). Joint Global Change Research Institute
NSW Department of Primary Industries, NSW (Australia); University of New England Armidale, NSW (Australia)
Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg (Sweden). Dept. of Space, Earth and Environment
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (Germany). Institute of Meteorology and Climate Research; Atmospheric Environmental Research (IMK‐IFU) Garmisch‐Partenkirchen (Germany); Department of Geo‐ecology (IFGG) Karlsruhe (Germany)
Norwegian Univ. of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim (Norway). Industrial Ecology Program Department of Energy and Process Engineering
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro (Brazi); Energy Planning Program Graduate School of Engineering; Imperial College London (United Kingdom). Centre for Environmental Policy
European Commission, Ispra (Italy). Joint Research Centre
University of Bristol United Kingdom). Cabot Institute Dept. of Geographical Sciences
Stockholm Environment Institute, Stockholm (Sweden)
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK) (Germany)
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (Germany). Institute of Meteorology and Climate Research; Atmospheric Environmental Research (IMK‐IFU) Garmisch‐Partenkirchen (Germany); Univ. of Edinburgh, Scotland (United Kingdom). School of Geosciences
Imperial College London (United Kingdom). Centre for Environmental Policy
Univ. of Aberdeen (United Kingdom). Institute of Biological and Environmental Sciences

Many global climate change mitigation pathways presented in IPCC assessment reports rely heavily on the deployment of biomass for bioenergy, often used in conjunction with carbon capture and storage (BECCS). We review the literature on bioenergy, including the modelling of bioenergy in integrated assessment models (IAMs) and bottom-up modelling and non-modelling studies on the implications of bioenergy use. We summarise the limitations of existing modelling studies and what is known about the potential co-benefits and adverse side-effects of bioenergy systems. We find that the implications of bioenergy supply on mitigation and other sustainability criteria are context dependent and influenced by feedstock, management regime, climatic region, scale of deployment and the counterfactual land use and energy system. However, due to limitations of the existing models, and uncertainty over the future context with respect to the many variables that influence availability of biomass and land resources, it is not possible to precisely quantify the sustainability implications for different scales of bioenergy implementation. Given these uncertainties, the dependence on large-scale deployment of bioenergy in mitigation scenarios carries risks. The deployment of bioenergy technologies and the evolution of biomass supply chains at a scale that achieves significant mitigation and carbon sequestration requires integrative policies, coordinated institutions and improved governance mechanisms. As a result, bioenergy, and the use of land to produce biomass, is an essential part of many climate mitigation strategies but there are limits to its use due to trade-offs with sustainability.

View Accepted Manuscript (DOE)

Research Organization:: Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL), Richland, WA (United States)

Sponsoring Organization:: USDOE

Grant/Contract Number:: AC05-76RL01830

OSTI ID:: 1819932

Report Number(s):: PNNL-SA--157982

Journal Information:: Global Change Biology. Bioenergy, Journal Name: Global Change Biology. Bioenergy Journal Issue: 9 Vol. 13; ISSN 1757-1693

Publisher:: WileyCopyright Statement

Country of Publication:: United States

Language:: English

References (246)

IAMC 1.5°C Scenario Explorer and Data hosted by IIASA Huppmann, Daniel; Kriegler, Elmar; Krey, Volker Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3363345	dataset	January 2019
Influence of watershed-climate interactions on stream temperature, sediment yield, and metabolism along a land use intensity gradient in Indonesian Borneo: BORNEAN STREAM HYDROLOGY Carlson, Kimberly M.; Curran, Lisa M.; Ponette-González, Alexandra G. Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences, Vol. 119, Issue 6 https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JG002516	journal	June 2014
Modeling the impacts of wood pellet demand on forest dynamics in southeastern United States Duden, Anna S.; Verweij, Pita A.; Junginger, H. Martin Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining, Vol. 11, Issue 6 https://doi.org/10.1002/bbb.1803	journal	September 2017
The future of biomass and bioenergy deployment and trade: a synthesis of 15 years IEA Bioenergy Task 40 on sustainable bioenergy trade: The future of biomass and bioenergy deployment and trade: a synthesis of 15 years IEA Bioenergy Task 40 on sustainable bioenergy trade Junginger, Hans Martin; Mai-Moulin, Thuy; Daioglou, Vassilis Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining, Vol. 13, Issue 2 https://doi.org/10.1002/bbb.1993	journal	March 2019
Progress and barriers in understanding and preventing indirect land‐use change Daioglou, Vassilis; Woltjer, Geert; Strengers, Bart Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining, Vol. 14, Issue 5 https://doi.org/10.1002/bbb.2124	journal	June 2020
Jatropha production on wastelands in India: opportunities and trade-offs for soil and water management at the watershed scale Garg, Kaushal K.; Karlberg, Louise; Wani, Suhas P. Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining, Vol. 5, Issue 4 https://doi.org/10.1002/bbb.312	journal	July 2011
Multifunctional biomass production systems –an overview with presentation of specific applications in India and Sweden Berndes, Göran; Börjesson, Pål; Ostwald, Madelene Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining, Vol. 2, Issue 1 https://doi.org/10.1002/bbb.52	journal	January 2008
Bioenergy from agroforestry can lead to improved food security, climate change, soil quality, and rural development Sharma, Navin; Bohra, Babita; Pragya, Namita Food and Energy Security, Vol. 5, Issue 3 https://doi.org/10.1002/fes3.87	journal	August 2016
Governing the Interlinkages between the Sustainable Development Goals: Approaches to Attain Policy Integration Tosun, Jale; Leininger, Julia Global Challenges, Vol. 1, Issue 9 https://doi.org/10.1002/gch2.201700036	journal	November 2017
A review of biomass energy - shortcomings and concerns: A review of biomass energy - shortcomings and concerns Rosillo-Calle, Frank Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology, Vol. 91, Issue 7 https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.4918	journal	March 2016
Behavioral models of climate change adaptation and mitigation in land-based sectors: Behavioral models in land-based sectors Brown, Calum; Alexander, Peter; Holzhauer, Sascha Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, Vol. 8, Issue 2 https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.448	journal	January 2017
A comparison of variation management strategies for wind power integration in different electricity system contexts Göransson, Lisa; Johnsson, Filip Wind Energy, Vol. 21, Issue 10 https://doi.org/10.1002/we.2198	journal	April 2018
The impact of biofuel demand on agricultural commodity prices: a systematic review: The impact of biofuel demand on agricultural commodity prices Persson, U. Martin Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, Vol. 4, Issue 5 https://doi.org/10.1002/wene.155	journal	November 2014
Introducing perennial biomass crops into agricultural landscapes to address water quality challenges and provide other environmental services: Integrating perennial bioenergy crops into agricultural landscapes Cacho, J. F.; Negri, M. C.; Zumpf, C. R. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, Vol. 7, Issue 2 https://doi.org/10.1002/wene.275	journal	November 2017
Positive water linkages of producing short rotation poplars and willows for bioenergy and phytotechnologies Zalesny, Ronald S.; Berndes, Göran; Dimitriou, Ioannis Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, Vol. 8, Issue 5 https://doi.org/10.1002/wene.345	journal	March 2019
Multifunctional perennial production systems for bioenergy: performance and progress Englund, Oskar; Dimitriou, Ioannis; Dale, Virginia H. WIREs Energy and Environment, Vol. 9, Issue 5 https://doi.org/10.1002/wene.375	journal	May 2020
Best management practices for forest bioenergy programs: Best management practices for forest bioenergy programs Neary, Daniel G. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, Vol. 2, Issue 6 https://doi.org/10.1002/wene.77	journal	May 2013
The representative concentration pathways: an overview van Vuuren, Detlef P.; Edmonds, Jae; Kainuma, Mikiko Climatic Change, Vol. 109, Issue 1-2 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-011-0148-z	journal	August 2011
Trade-offs of different land and bioenergy policies on the path to achieving climate targets Calvin, Katherine; Wise, Marshall; Kyle, Page Climatic Change, Vol. 123, Issue 3-4 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-0897-y	journal	October 2013
Implications of uncertain future fossil energy resources on bioenergy use and terrestrial carbon emissions Calvin, Katherine; Wise, Marshall; Luckow, Patrick Climatic Change, Vol. 136, Issue 1 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-0923-0	journal	October 2013
Land-use transition for bioenergy and climate stabilization: model comparison of drivers, impacts and interactions with other land use based mitigation options Popp, Alexander; Rose, Steven K.; Calvin, Katherine Climatic Change, Vol. 123, Issue 3-4 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-0926-x	journal	September 2013
Global energy sector emission reductions and bioenergy use: overview of the bioenergy demand phase of the EMF-33 model comparison Bauer, Nico; Rose, Steven K.; Fujimori, Shinichiro Climatic Change https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-018-2226-y	journal	July 2018
EMF-33 insights on bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) Muratori, Matteo; Bauer, Nico; Rose, Steven K. Climatic Change https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-020-02784-5	journal	August 2020
Bioenergy technologies in long-run climate change mitigation: results from the EMF-33 study Daioglou, Vassilis; Rose, Steven K.; Bauer, Nico Climatic Change https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-020-02799-y	journal	August 2020
Food security under high bioenergy demand toward long-term climate goals Hasegawa, Tomoko; Sands, Ronald D.; Brunelle, Thierry Climatic Change https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-020-02838-8	journal	August 2020
Implications of climate change mitigation strategies on international bioenergy trade Daioglou, Vassilis; Muratori, Matteo; Lamers, Patrick Climatic Change, Vol. 163, Issue 3 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-020-02877-1	journal	October 2020
Impact of large-scale tree planting in Yunnan Province, China, on the water supply balance in Southeast Asia Xiao, Yang; Xiao, Qiang Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, Vol. 191, Issue 1 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-018-7131-3	journal	December 2018
Integrating legacy soil phosphorus into sustainable nutrient management strategies for future food, bioenergy and water security Rowe, Helen; Withers, Paul J. A.; Baas, Peter Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, Vol. 104, Issue 3 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-015-9726-1	journal	September 2015
Spatial land use trade-offs for maintenance of biodiversity, biofuel, and agriculture Behrman, Kathrine D.; Juenger, Thomas E.; Kiniry, James R. Landscape Ecology, Vol. 30, Issue 10 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-015-0225-1	journal	June 2015
Does Soil Carbon Loss in Biomass Production Systems Negate the Greenhouse Benefits of Bioenergy? Cowie, Annette L.; Smith, Pete; Johnson, Dale Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Vol. 11, Issue 5-6 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-006-9030-0	journal	August 2006
The effect of crop residues, cover crops, manures and nitrogen fertilization on soil organic carbon changes in agroecosystems: a synthesis of reviews Bolinder, Martin A.; Crotty, Felicity; Elsen, Annemie Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Vol. 25, Issue 6 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-020-09916-3	journal	June 2020
Nitrogen Source Effect on Gluconacetobacter diazotrophicus Colonization of Sugarcane (Saccharum Spp.) Medeiros, A. F. A.; Polidoro, J. C.; Reis, V. M. Plant and Soil, Vol. 279, Issue 1-2 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-005-0551-1	journal	January 2006
Global inputs of biological nitrogen fixation in agricultural systems Herridge, David F.; Peoples, Mark B.; Boddey, Robert M. Plant and Soil, Vol. 311, Issue 1-2 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-008-9668-3	journal	July 2008
Modelling SOC response to land use change and management practices in sugarcane cultivation in South-Central Brazil Silva-Olaya, Adriana M.; Cerri, Carlos E. P.; Williams, Stephen Plant and Soil, Vol. 410, Issue 1-2 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-016-3030-y	journal	September 2016
Estimating water–food–ecosystem trade-offs for the global negative emission scenario (IPCC-RCP2.6) Yamagata, Yoshiki; Hanasaki, Naota; Ito, Akihiko Sustainability Science, Vol. 13, Issue 2 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-017-0522-5	journal	January 2018
Short-Rotation Coppice of Willow for Phytoremediation of a Metal-Contaminated Agricultural Area: A Sustainability Assessment Witters, Nele; Van Slycken, Stijn; Ruttens, Ann BioEnergy Research, Vol. 2, Issue 3 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-009-9042-1	journal	August 2009
GIS-based Tools for Regional Assessments and Planning Processes Regarding Potential Environmental Effects of Poplar SRC Busch, Gerald BioEnergy Research, Vol. 5, Issue 3 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-012-9224-0	journal	June 2012
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Responses to Nitrogen Fertilizer and Harvesting Rates in Switchgrass Cropping Systems Valdez, Zachary P.; Hockaday, William C.; Masiello, Caroline A. BioEnergy Research, Vol. 10, Issue 2 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-016-9810-7	journal	January 2017
Food security impacts of industrial crop production in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review of the impact mechanisms Jarzebski, Marcin Pawel; Ahmed, Abubakari; Boafo, Yaw Agyeman Food Security, Vol. 12, Issue 1 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-019-00988-x	journal	December 2019
Climate regulation, energy provisioning and water purification: Quantifying ecosystem service delivery of bioenergy willow grown on riparian buffer zones using life cycle assessment Styles, David; Börjesson, Pål; D’Hertefeldt, Tina Ambio, Vol. 45, Issue 8 https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-016-0790-9	journal	May 2016
The Value of BECCS in IAMs: a Review Köberle, Alexandre C. Current Sustainable/Renewable Energy Reports, Vol. 6, Issue 4 https://doi.org/10.1007/s40518-019-00142-3	journal	December 2019
Recovering Energy Biomass in Conventional Forest Operations: a Review of Integrated Harvesting Systems Spinelli, Raffaele; Visser, Rien; Björheden, Rolf Current Forestry Reports, Vol. 5, Issue 2 https://doi.org/10.1007/s40725-019-00089-0	journal	March 2019
The role of forest and bioenergy strategies in the global carbon cycle Schlamadinger, Bernhard; Marland, Gregg Biomass and Bioenergy, Vol. 10, Issue 5-6 https://doi.org/10.1016/0961-9534(95)00113-1	journal	January 1996
Forests for carbon sequestration or fossil fuel substitution? A sensitivity analysis Marland, G.; Schlamadinger, B. Biomass and Bioenergy, Vol. 13, Issue 6 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0961-9534(97)00027-5	journal	January 1997
Cadmium accumulation and Salix-based phytoextraction on arable land in Sweden Berndes, Göran; Fredrikson, Fredrik; Börjesson, Pål Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, Vol. 103, Issue 1 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2003.09.013	journal	June 2004
Tillage and soil carbon sequestration—What do we really know? Baker, John M.; Ochsner, Tyson E.; Venterea, Rodney T. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, Vol. 118, Issue 1-4 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2006.05.014	journal	January 2007
Soil carbon changes in areas undergoing expansion of sugarcane into pastures in south-central Brazil Oliveira, Dener Márcio da Silva; Paustian, Keith; Davies, Christian Andrew Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, Vol. 228 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2016.05.005	journal	July 2016
Intensification pathways for beef and dairy cattle production systems: Impacts on GHG emissions, land occupation and land use change Gerssen-Gondelach, Sarah J.; Lauwerijssen, Rachel B. G.; Havlík, Petr Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, Vol. 240 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2017.02.012	journal	March 2017
Mapping the world's degraded lands Gibbs, H. K.; Salmon, J. M. Applied Geography, Vol. 57 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2014.11.024	journal	February 2015
Different palm oil production systems for energy purposes and their greenhouse gas implications Wicke, Birka; Dornburg, Veronika; Junginger, Martin Biomass and Bioenergy, Vol. 32, Issue 12 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2008.04.001	journal	December 2008
Potential benefits of commercial willow Short Rotation Coppice (SRC) for farm-scale plant and invertebrate communities in the agri-environment Rowe, Rebecca L.; Hanley, Mick E.; Goulson, Dave Biomass and Bioenergy, Vol. 35, Issue 1 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2010.08.046	journal	January 2011
Slow expansion and low yields of willow short rotation coppice in Sweden; implications for future strategies Dimitriou, I.; Rosenqvist, H.; Berndes, G. Biomass and Bioenergy, Vol. 35, Issue 11 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.09.006	journal	November 2011
Simulated impact of future biofuel production on water quality and water cycle dynamics in the Upper Mississippi river basin Wu, May; Demissie, Yonas; Yan, Eugene Biomass and Bioenergy, Vol. 41 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2012.01.030	journal	June 2012
Buffers for biomass production in temperate European agriculture: A review and synthesis on function, ecosystem services and implementation Christen, Benjamin; Dalgaard, Tommy Biomass and Bioenergy, Vol. 55 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2012.09.053	journal	August 2013
Indirect land use change – Help beyond the hype? Finkbeiner, Matthias Biomass and Bioenergy, Vol. 62 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2014.01.024	journal	March 2014
Multifunctional landscapes: Site characterization and field-scale design to incorporate biomass production into an agricultural system Ssegane, Herbert; Negri, M. Cristina; Quinn, John Biomass and Bioenergy, Vol. 80 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2015.04.012	journal	September 2015
Land use change to bioenergy: A meta-analysis of soil carbon and GHG emissions Harris, Z. M.; Spake, R.; Taylor, G. Biomass and Bioenergy, Vol. 82 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2015.05.008	journal	November 2015
Agricultural and agro-industrial residues-to-energy: Techno-economic and environmental assessment in Brazil Portugal-Pereira, Joana; Soria, Rafael; Rathmann, Régis Biomass and Bioenergy, Vol. 81 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2015.08.010	journal	October 2015
Multi-dimensional poverty effects around operational biofuel projects in Malawi, Mozambique and Swaziland Mudombi, Shakespear; Von Maltitz, Graham Paul; Gasparatos, Alexandros Biomass and Bioenergy, Vol. 114 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2016.09.003	journal	July 2018
Biomass and biofuel crop effects on biodiversity and ecosystem services in the North Central US Landis, Douglas A.; Gratton, Claudio; Jackson, Randall D. Biomass and Bioenergy, Vol. 114 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2017.02.003	journal	July 2018
Sugarcane ethanol and beef cattle integration in Brazil de Souza, Nariê Rinke Dias; Fracarolli, Juliana Aparecida; Junqueira, Tassia L. Biomass and Bioenergy, Vol. 120 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2018.12.012	journal	January 2019
The roles of biomass and CSP in a 100 % renewable electricity supply in Australia Li, Mengyu; Lenzen, Manfred; Yousefzadeh, Moslem Biomass and Bioenergy, Vol. 143 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2020.105802	journal	December 2020
Willow coppice in intensive agricultural applications to reduce strain on the food-energy-water nexus Livingstone, David; Smyth, Beatrice M.; Foley, Aoife M. Biomass and Bioenergy, Vol. 144 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2020.105903	journal	January 2021
The importance of soil sampling depth for accurate account of soil organic carbon sequestration, storage, retention and loss Olson, K. R.; Al-Kaisi, M. M. CATENA, Vol. 125 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2014.10.004	journal	February 2015
Sustainable energy crop production Del Grosso, Stephen; Smith, Pete; Galdos, Marcelo Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, Vol. 9-10 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2014.07.007	journal	November 2014
Enhancing ecosystem services through targeted bioenergy support policies Baumber, Alex Ecosystem Services, Vol. 26 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.06.012	journal	August 2017
Land use intensification in the Rolling Pampa, Argentina: Diversifying crop sequences to increase yields and resource use Andrade, J. F.; Poggio, S. L.; Ermácora, M. European Journal of Agronomy, Vol. 82 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2016.09.013	journal	January 2017
Comparison of black liquor gasification with other pulping biorefinery concepts – Systems analysis of economic performance and CO2 emissions Pettersson, Karin; Harvey, Simon Energy, Vol. 37, Issue 1 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2011.10.020	journal	January 2012
Integration of biomass gasification with a Scandinavian mechanical pulp and paper mill – Consequences for mass and energy balances and global CO2 emissions Isaksson, Johan; Pettersson, Karin; Mahmoudkhani, Maryam Energy, Vol. 44, Issue 1 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2012.06.013	journal	August 2012
Overlooked impacts of electricity expansion optimisation modelling: The life cycle side of the story Portugal-Pereira, Joana; Köberle, Alexandre C.; Soria, Rafael Energy, Vol. 115 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2016.03.062	journal	November 2016
Recent developments of biofuels/bioenergy sustainability certification: A global overview Scarlat, Nicolae; Dallemand, Jean-François Energy Policy, Vol. 39, Issue 3 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.12.039	journal	March 2011
Factors in low-carbon energy transformations: Comparing nuclear and bioenergy in Brazil, Sweden, and the United States Hultman, Nathan E.; Malone, Elizabeth L.; Runci, Paul Energy Policy, Vol. 40 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.08.064	journal	January 2012
Dependency of global primary bioenergy crop potentials in 2050 on food systems, yields, biodiversity conservation and political stability Erb, Karl-Heinz; Haberl, Helmut; Plutzar, Christoph Energy Policy, Vol. 47 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.04.066	journal	August 2012
Implications of market-mediated emissions and uncertainty for biofuel policies Rajagopal, D.; Plevin, Richard J. Energy Policy, Vol. 56 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.09.076	journal	May 2013
Does the world have low-carbon bioenergy potential from the dedicated use of land? Searchinger, Timothy D.; Beringer, Tim; Strong, Asa Energy Policy, Vol. 110 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.08.016	journal	November 2017
Potential complementarity between forest carbon sequestration incentives and biomass energy expansion Baker, J. S.; Wade, C. M.; Sohngen, B. L. Energy Policy, Vol. 126 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.10.009	journal	March 2019
The role of biomass and bioenergy in a future bioeconomy: Policies and facts Scarlat, Nicolae; Dallemand, Jean-François; Monforti-Ferrario, Fabio Environmental Development, Vol. 15 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2015.03.006	journal	July 2015
The role of bioenergy in a climate-changing world Souza, Glaucia Mendes; Ballester, Maria Victoria R.; de Brito Cruz, Carlos Henrique Environmental Development, Vol. 23 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2017.02.008	journal	September 2017
The dilemma of indirect land-use changes in EU biofuel policy – An empirical study of policy-making in the context of scientific uncertainty Di Lucia, Lorenzo; Ahlgren, Serina; Ericsson, Karin Environmental Science & Policy, Vol. 16 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2011.11.004	journal	February 2012
Governance of the water-energy-food security nexus: A multi-level coordination challenge Pahl-Wostl, Claudia Environmental Science & Policy, Vol. 92 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2017.07.017	journal	February 2019
An integrated model for assessment of sustainable agricultural residue removal limits for bioenergy systems Muth, D. J.; Bryden, K. M. Environmental Modelling & Software, Vol. 39 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2012.04.006	journal	January 2013
Navigating the transition to sustainable bioenergy in Sweden and Brazil: Lessons learned in a European and International context Silveira, Semida; Johnson, Francis X. Energy Research & Social Science, Vol. 13 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2015.12.021	journal	March 2016
Addressing uncertainty in decarbonisation policy mixes – Lessons learned from German and European bioenergy policy Purkus, Alexandra; Gawel, Erik; Thrän, Daniela Energy Research & Social Science, Vol. 33 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.09.020	journal	November 2017
Bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS): Global potential, investment preferences, and deployment barriers Fridahl, Mathias; Lehtveer, Mariliis Energy Research & Social Science, Vol. 42 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.03.019	journal	August 2018
From Kyoto to Paris: Measuring renewable energy policy regimes in Argentina, Brazil, Canada, Mexico and the United States Pischke, Erin C.; Solomon, Barry; Wellstead, Adam Energy Research & Social Science, Vol. 50 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.11.010	journal	April 2019
Impacts of ethanol policy on corn prices: A review and meta-analysis of recent evidence Condon, Nicole; Klemick, Heather; Wolverton, Ann Food Policy, Vol. 51 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2014.12.007	journal	February 2015
Promoting landscape heterogeneity to improve the biodiversity benefits of certified palm oil production: Evidence from Peninsular Malaysia Azhar, Badrul; Saadun, Norzanalia; Puan, Chong Leong Global Ecology and Conservation, Vol. 3 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2015.02.009	journal	January 2015
Designing landscapes for biomass production and wildlife Jager, Henriëtte I.; Kreig, Jasmine A. F. Global Ecology and Conservation, Vol. 16 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2018.e00490	journal	October 2018
Securing a sustainable biomass supply in a growing bioeconomy Lewandowski, Iris Global Food Security, Vol. 6 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2015.10.001	journal	October 2015
The battle for biomass: A systematic review of food-feed-fuel competition Muscat, A.; de Olde, E. M.; de Boer, I. J. M. Global Food Security, Vol. 25 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2019.100330	journal	June 2020
Environmental flow provision: Implications for agricultural water and land-use at the global scale Bonsch, Markus; Popp, Alexander; Biewald, Anne Global Environmental Change, Vol. 30 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.10.015	journal	January 2015
Drivers for global agricultural land use change: The nexus of diet, population, yield and bioenergy Alexander, Peter; Rounsevell, Mark D. A.; Dislich, Claudia Global Environmental Change, Vol. 35 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.08.011	journal	November 2015
The Shared Socioeconomic Pathways and their energy, land use, and greenhouse gas emissions implications: An overview Riahi, Keywan; van Vuuren, Detlef P.; Kriegler, Elmar Global Environmental Change, Vol. 42 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.009	journal	January 2017
Land-use futures in the shared socio-economic pathways Popp, Alexander; Calvin, Katherine; Fujimori, Shinichiro Global Environmental Change, Vol. 42 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.10.002	journal	January 2017
Political risks arising from the impacts of large-scale afforestation on water resources of the Tibetan Plateau Cao, Shixiong; Zhang, Junze Gondwana Research, Vol. 28, Issue 2 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2014.07.002	journal	September 2015
The role of biogas solutions in sustainable biorefineries Hagman, Linda; Blumenthal, Alyssa; Eklund, Mats Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 172 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.180	journal	January 2018
Targeted grassland production – A Danish case study on multiple benefits from converting cereal to grasslands for green biorefinery Odgaard, Mette V.; Knudsen, Marie T.; Hermansen, John E. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 223 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.072	journal	June 2019
The effects of logging residue extraction for energy on ecosystem services and biodiversity: A synthesis Ranius, Thomas; Hämäläinen, Aino; Egnell, Gustaf Journal of Environmental Management, Vol. 209 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.12.048	journal	March 2018
Trade-offs between forest carbon stocks and harvests in a steady state – A multi-criteria analysis Pingoud, Kim; Ekholm, Tommi; Sievänen, Risto Journal of Environmental Management, Vol. 210 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.12.076	journal	March 2018
Food versus fuel? Going beyond biofuels Tomei, Julia; Helliwell, Richard Land Use Policy, Vol. 56 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.11.015	journal	November 2016
Competition between food, feed, and (bio)fuel: A supply-side model based assessment at the European scale Ben Fradj, N.; Jayet, P. A.; Aghajanzadeh-Darzi, P. Land Use Policy, Vol. 52 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.12.027	journal	March 2016
Actions and opinions of Brazilian farmers who shift to sugarcane⿿an interview-based assessment with discussion of implications for land-use change Egeskog, A.; Barretto, A.; Berndes, G. Land Use Policy, Vol. 57 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.06.022	journal	November 2016
A causal analysis framework for land-use change and the potential role of bioenergy policy Efroymson, Rebecca A.; Kline, Keith L.; Angelsen, Arild Land Use Policy, Vol. 59 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.09.009	journal	December 2016
Direct Air Carbon Capture and Sequestration: How It Works and How It Could Contribute to Climate-Change Mitigation Gambhir, Ajay; Tavoni, Massimo One Earth, Vol. 1, Issue 4 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2019.11.006	journal	December 2019
Energy- and greenhouse gas-based LCA of biofuel and bioenergy systems: Key issues, ranges and recommendations Cherubini, Francesco; Bird, Neil D.; Cowie, Annette Resources, Conservation and Recycling, Vol. 53, Issue 8 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2009.03.013	journal	June 2009
Identifying potential environmental impacts of large-scale deployment of dedicated bioenergy crops in the UK Rowe, Rebecca L.; Street, Nathaniel R.; Taylor, Gail Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 13, Issue 1 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2007.07.008	journal	January 2009
A synthesis of the ecosystem services impact of second generation bioenergy crop production Holland, R. A.; Eigenbrod, F.; Muggeridge, A. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 46 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.02.003	journal	June 2015
An overview of biofuels policies and industrialization in the major biofuel producing countries Su, Yujie; Zhang, Peidong; Su, Yuqing Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 50 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.04.032	journal	October 2015
Incorporating bioenergy into sustainable landscape designs Dale, Virginia H.; Kline, Keith L.; Buford, Marilyn A. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 56 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.038	journal	April 2016
Sustainability constraints in determining European bioenergy potential: A review of existing studies and steps forward Kluts, Ingeborg; Wicke, Birka; Leemans, Rik Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 69 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.036	journal	March 2017
Multiple ecosystem services provision and biomass logistics management in bioenergy buffers: A state-of-the-art review Ferrarini, Andrea; Serra, Paolo; Almagro, María Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 73 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.01.052	journal	June 2017
An international review of the most productive and cost effective forest biomass recovery technologies and supply chains Ghaffariyan, Mohammad Reza; Brown, Mark; Acuna, Mauricio Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 74 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.02.014	journal	July 2017
Quantifying the climate effects of bioenergy – Choice of reference system Koponen, Kati; Soimakallio, Sampo; Kline, Keith L. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 81 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.292	journal	January 2018
Anaerobic digestion of food waste for bio-energy production in China and Southeast Asia: A review Negri, Camilla; Ricci, Marina; Zilio, Massimo Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 133 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.110138	journal	November 2020
Effective sustainability criteria for bioenergy: Towards the implementation of the european renewable directive II Mai-Moulin, T.; Hoefnagels, R.; Grundmann, P. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 138 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.110645	journal	March 2021
Impacts of converting low-intensity pastureland to high-intensity bioenergy cropland on the water quality of tropical streams in Brazil Taniwaki, Ricardo Hideo; Cassiano, Carla Cristina; Filoso, Solange Science of The Total Environment, Vol. 584-585 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.12.150	journal	April 2017
Intensify production, transform biomass to energy and novel goods and protect soils in Europe—A vision how to mobilize marginal lands Schröder, P.; Beckers, B.; Daniels, S. Science of The Total Environment, Vol. 616-617 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.10.209	journal	March 2018
Spatially explicit LCA analysis of biodiversity losses due to different bioenergy policies in the European Union Di Fulvio, Fulvio; Forsell, Nicklas; Korosuo, Anu Science of The Total Environment, Vol. 651 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.08.419	journal	February 2019
Residue retention promotes soil carbon accumulation in minimum tillage systems: Implications for conservation agriculture Li, Yuan; Li, Zhou; Chang, Scott X. Science of The Total Environment, Vol. 740 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140147	journal	October 2020
Long-term global water projections using six socioeconomic scenarios in an integrated assessment modeling framework Hejazi, Mohamad; Edmonds, James; Clarke, Leon Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 81 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2013.05.006	journal	January 2014
Pathways to achieve a set of ambitious global sustainability objectives by 2050: Explorations using the IMAGE integrated assessment model van Vuuren, Detlef P.; Kok, Marcel; Lucas, Paul L. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 98 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2015.03.005	journal	September 2015
How will oil palm expansion affect biodiversity? Fitzherbert, E.; Struebig, M.; Morel, A. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, Vol. 23, Issue 10 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2008.06.012	journal	October 2008
Targeting perennial vegetation in agricultural landscapes for enhancing ecosystem services Asbjornsen, H.; Hernandez-Santana, V.; Liebman, M. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems, Vol. 29, Issue 2 https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742170512000385	journal	February 2013
Land Availability for Biofuel Production Cai, Ximing; Zhang, Xiao; Wang, Dingbao Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 45, Issue 1 https://doi.org/10.1021/es103338e	journal	January 2011
Using Land To Mitigate Climate Change: Hitting the Target, Recognizing the Trade-offs Reilly, John; Melillo, Jerry; Cai, Yongxia Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 46, Issue 11 https://doi.org/10.1021/es2034729	journal	May 2012
Climate Policy Decisions Require Policy-Based Lifecycle Analysis Bento, Antonio M.; Klotz, Richard Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 48, Issue 10 https://doi.org/10.1021/es405164g	journal	May 2014
Europe’s Green Deal offshores environmental damage to other nations Fuchs, Richard; Brown, Calum; Rounsevell, Mark Nature, Vol. 586, Issue 7831 https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-02991-1	journal	October 2020
Payback time for soil carbon and sugar-cane ethanol Mello, Francisco F. C.; Cerri, Carlos E. P.; Davies, Christian A. Nature Climate Change, Vol. 4, Issue 7 https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2239	journal	June 2014
Uncertainty in projecting GHG emissions from bioenergy Buchholz, Thomas; Prisley, Stephen; Marland, Gregg Nature Climate Change, Vol. 4, Issue 12 https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2418	journal	November 2014
Biophysical and economic limits to negative CO2 emissions Smith, Pete; Davis, Steven J.; Creutzig, Felix Nature Climate Change, Vol. 6, Issue 1 https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2870	journal	December 2015
The social inefficiency of regulating indirect land use change due to biofuels Khanna, Madhu; Wang, Weiwei; Hudiburg, Tara W. Nature Communications, Vol. 8, Issue 1 https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms15513	journal	June 2017
Impacts of a 32-billion-gallon bioenergy landscape on land and fossil fuel use in the US Hudiburg, Tara W.; Wang, WeiWei; Khanna, Madhu Nature Energy, Vol. 1, Issue 1 https://doi.org/10.1038/nenergy.2015.5	journal	January 2016
The limits of bioenergy for mitigating global life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions from fossil fuels Staples, Mark D.; Malina, Robert; Barrett, Steven R. H. Nature Energy, Vol. 2, Issue 2 https://doi.org/10.1038/nenergy.2016.202	journal	January 2017
Land-use emissions play a critical role in land-based mitigation for Paris climate targets Harper, Anna B.; Powell, Tom; Cox, Peter M. Nature Communications, Vol. 9, Issue 1 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-05340-z	journal	August 2018
Europe’s renewable energy directive poised to harm global forests Searchinger, Timothy D.; Beringer, Tim; Holtsmark, Bjart Nature Communications, Vol. 9, Issue 1 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-06175-4	journal	September 2018
An inter-model assessment of the role of direct air capture in deep mitigation pathways Realmonte, Giulia; Drouet, Laurent; Gambhir, Ajay Nature Communications, Vol. 10, Issue 1 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-10842-5	journal	July 2019
Greenhouse gas emission curves for advanced biofuel supply chains Daioglou, Vassilis; Doelman, Jonathan C.; Stehfest, Elke Nature Climate Change, Vol. 7, Issue 12 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-017-0006-8	journal	November 2017
Biomass-based negative emissions difficult to reconcile with planetary boundaries Heck, Vera; Gerten, Dieter; Lucht, Wolfgang Nature Climate Change, Vol. 8, Issue 2 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-017-0064-y	journal	January 2018
Alternative pathways to the 1.5 °C target reduce the need for negative emission technologies van Vuuren, Detlef P.; Stehfest, Elke; Gernaat, David E. H. J. Nature Climate Change, Vol. 8, Issue 5 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0119-8	journal	April 2018
Achievement of Paris climate goals unlikely due to time lags in the land system Brown, Calum; Alexander, Peter; Arneth, Almut Nature Climate Change, Vol. 9, Issue 3 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-019-0400-5	journal	February 2019
Food–energy–water implications of negative emissions technologies in a +1.5 °C future Fuhrman, Jay; McJeon, Haewon; Patel, Pralit Nature Climate Change, Vol. 10, Issue 10 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-020-0876-z	journal	August 2020
The climate change mitigation potential of bioenergy with carbon capture and storage Hanssen, S. V.; Daioglou, V.; Steinmann, Z. J. N. Nature Climate Change, Vol. 10, Issue 11 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-020-0885-y	journal	August 2020
Understanding future emissions from low-carbon power systems by integration of life-cycle assessment and integrated energy modelling Pehl, Michaja; Arvesen, Anders; Humpenöder, Florian Nature Energy, Vol. 2, Issue 12 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-017-0032-9	journal	December 2017
Incentivize negative emissions responsibly Bellamy, Rob Nature Energy, Vol. 3, Issue 7 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-018-0156-6	journal	May 2018
Options for keeping the food system within environmental limits Springmann, Marco; Clark, Michael; Mason-D’Croz, Daniel Nature, Vol. 562, Issue 7728 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0594-0	journal	October 2018
A meta-analysis of the greenhouse gas abatement of bioenergy factoring in land use changes El Akkari, M.; Réchauchère, O.; Bispo, A. Scientific Reports, Vol. 8, Issue 1 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-26712-x	journal	June 2018
Unprecedented rates of land-use transformation in modelled climate change mitigation pathways Turner, P. A.; Field, C. B.; Lobell, D. B. Nature Sustainability, Vol. 1, Issue 5 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-018-0063-7	journal	May 2018
The potential of future foods for sustainable and healthy diets Parodi, A.; Leip, A.; De Boer, I. J. M. Nature Sustainability, Vol. 1, Issue 12 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-018-0189-7	journal	December 2018
A global perspective on sustainable intensification research Cassman, Kenneth G.; Grassini, Patricio Nature Sustainability, Vol. 3, Issue 4 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-020-0507-8	journal	April 2020
Climate change responses benefit from a global food system approach Rosenzweig, Cynthia; Mbow, Cheikh; Barioni, Luis G. Nature Food, Vol. 1, Issue 2 https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-020-0031-z	journal	February 2020
The water-land-food nexus of first-generation biofuels Rulli, Maria Cristina; Bellomi, Davide; Cazzoli, Andrea Scientific Reports, Vol. 6, Issue 1 https://doi.org/10.1038/srep22521	journal	March 2016
Water Quality Impacts of Corn Production to Meet Biofuel Demands Thomas, Mark A.; Engel, Bernard A.; Chaubey, Indrajeet Journal of Environmental Engineering, Vol. 135, Issue 11 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0000095	journal	November 2009
Perennial grasslands enhance biodiversity and multiple ecosystem services in bioenergy landscapes Werling, B. P.; Dickson, T. L.; Isaacs, R. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 111, Issue 4 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1309492111	journal	January 2014
Bioenergy cropland expansion may offset positive effects of climate change mitigation for global vertebrate diversity Hof, Christian; Voskamp, Alke; Biber, Matthias F. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 115, Issue 52 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1807745115	journal	December 2018
The political ecology of Jatropha plantations for biodiesel in Tamil Nadu, India Ariza-Montobbio, Pere; Lele, Sharachchandra; Kallis, Giorgos The Journal of Peasant Studies, Vol. 37, Issue 4 https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2010.512462	journal	September 2010
Biological Nitrogen Fixation in Sugar Cane: A Key to Energetically Viable Biofuel Production Boddey, Robert M. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences, Vol. 14, Issue 3 https://doi.org/10.1080/07352689509701929	journal	January 1995
Biofuel sustainability and the formation of transnational hybrid governance Ponte, Stefano; Daugbjerg, Carsten Environmental Politics, Vol. 24, Issue 1 https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2014.954776	journal	September 2014
Empirical evidence for the diffusion of knowledge in land use change Brown, Calum; Alexander, Peter; Rounsevell, Mark Journal of Land Use Science, Vol. 13, Issue 3 https://doi.org/10.1080/1747423X.2018.1515995	journal	May 2018
Using participatory system dynamics modelling to quantify indirect land use changes of biofuel projects Di Lucia, Lorenzo; Peterson, Steve; Sevigné-Itoiz, Eva Journal of Land Use Science, Vol. 16, Issue 1 https://doi.org/10.1080/1747423X.2020.1855265	journal	December 2020
Low-ILUC-risk rapeseed biodiesel: potential and indirect GHG emission effects in Eastern Romania Brinkman, Marnix L. J.; van der Hilst, Floor; Faaij, André P. C. Biofuels, Vol. 12, Issue 2 https://doi.org/10.1080/17597269.2018.1464873	journal	May 2018
Comparative water use by maize, perennial crops, restored prairie, and poplar trees in the US Midwest Hamilton, S. K.; Hussain, M. Z.; Bhardwaj, A. K. Environmental Research Letters, Vol. 10, Issue 6 https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/10/6/064015	journal	June 2015
Expert assessment concludes negative emissions scenarios may not deliver Vaughan, Naomi E.; Gough, Clair Environmental Research Letters, Vol. 11, Issue 9 https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/11/9/095003	journal	August 2016
Global economic consequences of deploying bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) Muratori, Matteo; Calvin, Katherine; Wise, Marshall Environmental Research Letters, Vol. 11, Issue 9 https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/11/9/095004	journal	August 2016
The economic potential of bioenergy for climate change mitigation with special attention given to implications for the land system Popp, Alexander; Dietrich, Jan Philipp; Lotze-Campen, Hermann Environmental Research Letters, Vol. 6, Issue 3 https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/6/3/034017	journal	July 2011
Bioenergy: how much can we expect for 2050? Haberl, Helmut; Erb, Karl-Heinz; Krausmann, Fridolin Environmental Research Letters, Vol. 8, Issue 3 https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/8/3/031004	journal	September 2013
Investigating afforestation and bioenergy CCS as climate change mitigation strategies Humpenöder, Florian; Popp, Alexander; Dietrich, Jan Philip Environmental Research Letters, Vol. 9, Issue 6 https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/9/6/064029	journal	May 2014
Possibilities for near-term bioenergy production and GHG-mitigation through sustainable intensification of agriculture and forestry in Denmark Larsen, Søren; Bentsen, Niclas S.; Dalgaard, Tommy Environmental Research Letters, Vol. 12, Issue 11 https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa9001	journal	November 2017
Large-scale bioenergy production: how to resolve sustainability trade-offs? Humpenöder, Florian; Popp, Alexander; Bodirsky, Benjamin Leon Environmental Research Letters, Vol. 13, Issue 2 https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa9e3b	journal	February 2018
Evaluating the use of biomass energy with carbon capture and storage in low emission scenarios Vaughan, Naomi E.; Gough, Clair; Mander, Sarah Environmental Research Letters, Vol. 13, Issue 4 https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aaaa02	journal	March 2018
Negative emissions—Part 2: Costs, potentials and side effects Fuss, Sabine; Lamb, William F.; Callaghan, Max W. Environmental Research Letters, Vol. 13, Issue 6 https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aabf9f	journal	May 2018
Freshwater requirements of large-scale bioenergy plantations for limiting global warming to 1.5 °C Stenzel, Fabian; Gerten, Dieter; Werner, Constanze Environmental Research Letters, Vol. 14, Issue 8 https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab2b4b	journal	July 2019
A deep dive into the modelling assumptions for biomass with carbon capture and storage (BECCS): a transparency exercise Butnar, Isabela; Li, Pei-Hao; Strachan, Neil Environmental Research Letters, Vol. 15, Issue 8 https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab5c3e	journal	July 2020
Greenhouse gas implications of mobilizing agricultural biomass for energy: a reassessment of global potentials in 2050 under different food-system pathways Kalt, Gerald; Lauk, Christian; Mayer, Andreas Environmental Research Letters, Vol. 15, Issue 3 https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab6c2e	journal	March 2020
The economic and environmental costs and benefits of the renewable fuel standard Chen, Luoye; Debnath, Deepayan; Zhong, Jia Environmental Research Letters, Vol. 16, Issue 3 https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abd7af	journal	February 2021
Global Bioeconomy in the Conflict Between Biomass Supply and Demand Piotrowski, Stephan; Carus, Michael; Essel, Roland Industrial Biotechnology, Vol. 11, Issue 6 https://doi.org/10.1089/ind.2015.29021.stp	journal	December 2015
Some Contributions of Integrated Assessment Models of Global Climate Change Weyant, John Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, Vol. 11, Issue 1 https://doi.org/10.1093/reep/rew018	journal	January 2017
Modelling the perennial energy crop market: the role of spatial diffusion Alexander, Peter; Moran, Dominic; Rounsevell, Mark D. A. Journal of The Royal Society Interface, Vol. 10, Issue 88 https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2013.0656	journal	November 2013
Sustainable pest regulation in agricultural landscapes: a review on landscape composition, biodiversity and natural pest control Bianchi, F. J. J. A.; Booij, C. J. H.; Tscharntke, T. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, Vol. 273, Issue 1595 https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2006.3530	journal	April 2006
Good Governance in the Bioeconomy Devaney, Laura; Henchion, Maeve; Regan, Áine EuroChoices, Vol. 16, Issue 2 https://doi.org/10.1111/1746-692X.12141	journal	January 2017
Optimizing chamber methods for measuring nitrous oxide emissions from plot-based agricultural experiments: N Chadwick, D. R.; Cardenas, L.; Misselbrook, T. H. European Journal of Soil Science, Vol. 65, Issue 2 https://doi.org/10.1111/ejss.12117	journal	January 2014
Crop rotational diversity enhances belowground communities and functions in an agroecosystem Tiemann, L. K.; Grandy, A. S.; Atkinson, E. E. Ecology Letters, Vol. 18, Issue 8 https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12453	journal	May 2015
Soil carbon stock change following afforestation in Northern Europe: a meta‐analysis Bárcena, T. G.; Kiær, L. P.; Vesterdal, L. Global Change Biology, Vol. 20, Issue 8 https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12576	journal	May 2014
Large uncertainty in carbon uptake potential of land-based climate-change mitigation efforts Krause, Andreas; Pugh, Thomas A. M.; Bayer, Anita D. Global Change Biology, Vol. 24, Issue 7 https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14144	journal	April 2018
Which practices co‐deliver food security, climate change mitigation and adaptation, and combat land degradation and desertification? Smith, Pete; Calvin, Katherine; Nkem, Johnson Global Change Biology, Vol. 26, Issue 3 https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14878	journal	December 2019
Afforestation for climate change mitigation: Potentials, risks and trade‐offs Doelman, Jonathan C.; Stehfest, Elke; Vuuren, Detlef P. Global Change Biology, Vol. 26, Issue 3 https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14887	journal	November 2019
Climate drives global soil carbon sequestration and crop yield changes under conservation agriculture Sun, Wenjuan; Canadell, Josep G.; Yu, Lijun Global Change Biology, Vol. 26, Issue 6 https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.15001	journal	February 2020
Evaluating ecosystem processes in willow short rotation coppice bioenergy plantations Rowe, Rebecca L.; Goulson, Dave; Doncaster, C. Patrick GCB Bioenergy, Vol. 5, Issue 3 https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12040	journal	February 2013
Management swing potential for bioenergy crops Davis, Sarah C.; Boddey, Robert M.; Alves, Bruno J. R. GCB Bioenergy, Vol. 5, Issue 6 https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12042	journal	January 2013
Biodiversity impacts of bioenergy crop production: a state-of-the-art review Immerzeel, DesirÉE J.; Verweij, Pita A.; van der Hilst, Floor GCB Bioenergy, Vol. 6, Issue 3 https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12067	journal	April 2013
Net land-atmosphere flows of biogenic carbon related to bioenergy: towards an understanding of systemic feedbacks Haberl, Helmut GCB Bioenergy, Vol. 5, Issue 4 https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12071	journal	April 2013
A reassessment of global bioenergy potential in 2050 Searle, Stephanie; Malins, Chris GCB Bioenergy, Vol. 7, Issue 2 https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12141	journal	February 2014
Bioenergy crop greenhouse gas mitigation potential under a range of management practices Hudiburg, Tara W.; Davis, Sarah C.; Parton, William GCB Bioenergy, Vol. 7, Issue 2 https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12152	journal	March 2014
No general soil carbon sequestration under Central European short rotation coppices Walter, Katja; Don, Axel; Flessa, Heinz GCB Bioenergy, Vol. 7, Issue 4 https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12177	journal	April 2014
Bioenergy and climate change mitigation: an assessment Creutzig, Felix; Ravindranath, N. H.; Berndes, Göran GCB Bioenergy, Vol. 7, Issue 5 https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12205	journal	July 2014
Economic and ecological views on climate change mitigation with bioenergy and negative emissions Creutzig, Felix GCB Bioenergy, Vol. 8, Issue 1 https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12235	journal	December 2014
Potential impacts on ecosystem services of land use transitions to second-generation bioenergy crops in GB Milner, Suzanne; Holland, Robert A.; Lovett, Andrew GCB Bioenergy, Vol. 8, Issue 2 https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12263	journal	June 2015
Influence of spatially dependent, modeled soil carbon emission factors on life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions of corn and cellulosic ethanol Qin, Zhangcai; Dunn, Jennifer B.; Kwon, Hoyoung GCB Bioenergy, Vol. 8, Issue 6 https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12333	journal	March 2016
Bioenergy production and sustainable development: science base for policymaking remains limited Robledo-Abad, Carmenza; Althaus, Hans-Jörg; Berndes, Göran GCB Bioenergy, Vol. 9, Issue 3 https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12338	journal	March 2016
High-resolution spatial modelling of greenhouse gas emissions from land-use change to energy crops in the United Kingdom Richards, Mark; Pogson, Mark; Dondini, Marta GCB Bioenergy, Vol. 9, Issue 3 https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12360	journal	April 2016
Reconciling food security and bioenergy: priorities for action Kline, Keith L.; Msangi, Siwa; Dale, Virginia H. GCB Bioenergy, Vol. 9, Issue 3 https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12366	journal	June 2016
Importance of biophysical effects on climate warming mitigation potential of biofuel crops over the conterminous United States Zhu, Peng; Zhuang, Qianlai; Eva, Joo GCB Bioenergy, Vol. 9, Issue 3 https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12370	journal	June 2016
Contribution of above- and belowground bioenergy crop residues to soil carbon Carvalho, Joao L. N.; Hudiburg, Tara W.; Franco, Henrique C. J. GCB Bioenergy, Vol. 9, Issue 8 https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12411	journal	January 2017
Carbon balances of bioenergy systems using biomass from forests managed with long rotations: bridging the gap between stand and landscape assessments Cintas, Olivia; Berndes, Göran; Cowie, Annette L. GCB Bioenergy, Vol. 9, Issue 7 https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12425	journal	February 2017
Status and prospects for renewable energy using wood pellets from the southeastern United States Dale, Virginia H.; Kline, Keith L.; Parish, Esther S. GCB Bioenergy, Vol. 9, Issue 8 https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12445	journal	April 2017
Consensus, uncertainties and challenges for perennial bioenergy crops and land use Whitaker, Jeanette; Field, John L.; Bernacchi, Carl J. GCB Bioenergy, Vol. 10, Issue 3 https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12488	journal	November 2017
Biomass production in plantations: Land constraints increase dependency on irrigation water Jans, Yvonne; Berndes, Göran; Heinke, Jens GCB Bioenergy, Vol. 10, Issue 9 https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12530	journal	July 2018
Project level assessment of indirect land use changes arising from biofuel production Di Lucia, Lorenzo; Sevigné‐Itoiz, Eva; Peterson, Steve GCB Bioenergy, Vol. 11, Issue 11 https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12638	journal	June 2019
Serious mismatches continue between science and policy in forest bioenergy Norton, Michael; Baldi, Andras; Buda, Vicas GCB Bioenergy, Vol. 11, Issue 11 https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12643	journal	September 2019
Sustainable intensification of crop residue exploitation for bioenergy: Opportunities and challenges Mouratiadou, Ioanna; Stella, Tommaso; Gaiser, Thomas GCB Bioenergy, Vol. 12, Issue 1 https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12649	journal	October 2019
On the forest cover–water yield debate: from demand‐ to supply‐side thinking Ellison, David; N. Futter, Martyn; Bishop, Kevin Global Change Biology, Vol. 18, Issue 3 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02589.x	journal	November 2011
Quantifying global greenhouse gas emissions from land-use change for crop production Flynn, Helen C.; Canals, Llorenç Milà i.; Keller, Emma Global Change Biology, Vol. 18, Issue 5 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02618.x	journal	January 2012
Policy Options for Integrated Energy and Agricultural Markets * Tyner, Wallace E.; Taheripour, Farzad Review of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 30, Issue 3 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9353.2008.00412.x	journal	September 2008
Changes in soil organic carbon under biofuel crops Anderson-Teixeira, Kristina J.; Davis, Sarah C.; Masters, Michael D. GCB Bioenergy, Vol. 1, Issue 1 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1757-1707.2008.01001.x	journal	February 2009
The potential of Miscanthus to sequester carbon in soils: comparing field measurements in Carlow, Ireland to model predictions Dondini, Marta; Hastings, Astley; Saiz, Gustavo GCB Bioenergy, Vol. 1, Issue 6 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1757-1707.2010.01033.x	journal	December 2009
Bioethanol production from sugarcane and emissions of greenhouse gases - known and unknowns: GHG EMISSIONS AND BIOETHANOL FROM SUGARCANE Lisboa, Carolina Cardoso; Butterbach-Bahl, Klaus; Mauder, Matthias GCB Bioenergy, Vol. 3, Issue 4 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01095.x	journal	February 2011
Land-use change to bioenergy production in Europe: implications for the greenhouse gas balance and soil carbon Don, Axel; Osborne, Bruce; Hastings, Astley GCB Bioenergy, Vol. 4, Issue 4 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01116.x	journal	September 2011
When the Background Matters: Using Scenarios from Integrated Assessment Models in Prospective Life Cycle Assessment Mendoza Beltran, Angelica; Cox, Brian; Mutel, Chris Journal of Industrial Ecology https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12825	journal	November 2018
Transnational legal processes, the EU and RED II: Strengthening the global governance of bioenergy Webster, Emily Review of European, Comparative & International Environmental Law, Vol. 29, Issue 1 https://doi.org/10.1111/reel.12315	journal	December 2019
Forests: Carbon sequestration, biomass energy, or both? Favero, Alice; Daigneault, Adam; Sohngen, Brent Science Advances, Vol. 6, Issue 13 https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aay6792	journal	March 2020
Indirect Emissions from Biofuels: How Important? Melillo, J. M.; Reilly, J. M.; Kicklighter, D. W. Science, Vol. 326, Issue 5958 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1180251	journal	October 2009
Cellulosic biofuel contributions to a sustainable energy future: Choices and outcomes Robertson, G. Philip; Hamilton, Stephen K.; Barham, Bradford L. Science, Vol. 356, Issue 6345 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aal2324	journal	June 2017
Global food system emissions could preclude achieving the 1.5° and 2°C climate change targets Clark, Michael A.; Domingo, Nina G. G.; Colgan, Kimberly Science, Vol. 370, Issue 6517 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aba7357	journal	November 2020
Measuring Indirect Land Use Change with Biofuels: Implications for Policy Khanna, Madhu; Crago, Christine L. Annual Review of Resource Economics, Vol. 4, Issue 1 https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-resource-110811-114523	journal	August 2012
On the Long-Term Hydroclimatic Sustainability of Perennial Bioenergy Crop Expansion over the United States Wang, M.; Wagner, M.; Miguez-Macho, G. Journal of Climate, Vol. 30, Issue 7 https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0610.1	journal	April 2017
Indirect land use changes of biofuel production – a review of modelling efforts and policy developments in the European Union Ahlgren, Serina; Di Lucia, Lorenzo Biotechnology for Biofuels, Vol. 7, Issue 1 https://doi.org/10.1186/1754-6834-7-35	journal	January 2014
Science-based approach for credible accounting of mitigation in managed forests Grassi, Giacomo; Pilli, Roberto; House, Jo Carbon Balance and Management, Vol. 13, Issue 1 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13021-018-0096-2	journal	May 2018
To integrate or to segregate food crop and energy crop cultivation at the landscape scale? Perspectives on biodiversity conservation in agriculture in Europe Dauber, Jens; Miyake, Saori Energy, Sustainability and Society, Vol. 6, Issue 1 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13705-016-0089-5	journal	September 2016
A spatial explicit scenario method to support participative regional land-use decisions regarding economic and ecological options of short rotation coppice (SRC) for renewable energy production on arable land: case study application for the Göttingen district, Germany Busch, Gerald Energy, Sustainability and Society, Vol. 7, Issue 1 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13705-017-0105-4	journal	January 2017
Strengths and gaps of the EU frameworks for the sustainability assessment of bio-based products and bioenergy Moosmann, David; Majer, Stefan; Ugarte, Sergio Energy, Sustainability and Society, Vol. 10, Issue 1 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13705-020-00251-8	journal	May 2020
Pest-Suppression Potential of Midwestern Landscapes under Contrasting Bioenergy Scenarios Meehan, Timothy D.; Werling, Ben P.; Landis, Douglas A. PLoS ONE, Vol. 7, Issue 7 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0041728	journal	July 2012
Potential water quality changes due to corn expansion in the Upper Mississippi River Basin Secchi, Silvia; Gassman, Philip W.; Jha, Manoj Ecological Applications, Vol. 21, Issue 4 https://doi.org/10.1890/09-0619.1	journal	June 2011
Implications for Soil Properties of Removing Cereal Straw: Results from Long-Term Studies ¹ Powlson, David S.; Glendining, Margaret J.; Coleman, Kevin Agronomy Journal, Vol. 103, Issue 1 https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2010.0146s	journal	January 2011
An Integrated Landscape Designed for Commodity and Bioenergy Crops for a Tile-Drained Agricultural Watershed Ssegane, Herbert; Negri, M. Cristina Journal of Environment Quality, Vol. 45, Issue 5 https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2015.10.0518	journal	January 2016
Yield and Water Quality Impacts of Field-Scale Integration of Willow into a Continuous Corn Rotation System Zumpf, Colleen; Ssegane, Herbert; Negri, Maria Cristina Journal of Environment Quality, Vol. 46, Issue 4 https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2017.02.0082	journal	January 2017
Climate Change Impacts on Yields and Soil Carbon in Row Crop Dryland Agriculture Robertson, Andy D.; Zhang, Yao; Sherrod, Lucretia A. Journal of Environmental Quality, Vol. 47, Issue 4 https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2017.08.0309	journal	July 2018
Soil Organic Carbon Sequestration Rates by Tillage and Crop Rotation West, Tristram O.; Post, Wilfred M. Soil Science Society of America Journal, Vol. 66, Issue 6, p. 1930-1946 https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2002.1930	journal	January 2002
Reducing Fertilizer and Avoiding Herbicides in Oil Palm Plantations—Ecological and Economic Valuations Darras, Kevin F. A.; Corre, Marife D.; Formaglio, Greta Frontiers in Forests and Global Change, Vol. 2 https://doi.org/10.3389/ffgc.2019.00065	journal	November 2019
Global Biofuels at the Crossroads: An Overview of Technical, Policy, and Investment Complexities in the Sustainability of Biofuel Development Araújo, Kathleen; Mahajan, Devinder; Kerr, Ryan Agriculture, Vol. 7, Issue 4 https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture7040032	journal	March 2017
Quantifying the Water-Energy-Food Nexus: Current Status and Trends Chang, Yuan; Li, Guijun; Yao, Yuan Energies, Vol. 9, Issue 2 https://doi.org/10.3390/en9020065	journal	January 2016
GHG Balance of Agricultural Intensification & Bioenergy Production in the Orinoquia Region, Colombia Ramírez-Contreras, Nidia Elizabeth; Munar-Florez, David; Hilst, Floor van der Land, Vol. 10, Issue 3 https://doi.org/10.3390/land10030289	journal	March 2021
Recent Developments in Low iLUC Policies and Certification in the EU Biobased Economy Sumfleth, Beike; Majer, Stefan; Thrän, Daniela Sustainability, Vol. 12, Issue 19 https://doi.org/10.3390/su12198147	journal	October 2020
Effect of crop residue harvest on long-term crop yield, soil erosion and nutrient balance: trade-offs for a sustainable bioenergy feedstock Gregg, Jay S.; Izaurralde, R. César Biofuels, Vol. 1, Issue 1 https://doi.org/10.4155/bfs.09.8	journal	January 2010
Indirect land use change: review of existing models and strategies for mitigation Wicke, Birka; Verweij, Pita; van Meijl, Hans Biofuels, Vol. 3, Issue 1 https://doi.org/10.4155/bfs.11.154	journal	January 2012
Mapping the yields of lignocellulosic bioenergy crops from observations at the global scale Li, Wei; Ciais, Philippe; Stehfest, Elke Earth System Science Data, Vol. 12, Issue 2 https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-12-789-2020	journal	January 2020
GCAM v5.1: representing the linkages between energy, water, land, climate, and economic systems Calvin, Katherine; Patel, Pralit; Clarke, Leon Geoscientific Model Development, Vol. 12, Issue 2 https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-677-2019	journal	January 2019
Bioenergy Sustainability at the Regional Scale Dale, Virginia H.; Lowrance, Richard; Mulholland, Patrick Ecology and Society, Vol. 15, Issue 4 https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-03725-150423	journal	January 2010

Similar Records

Global energy sector emission reductions and bioenergy use: overview of the bioenergy demand phase of the EMF-33 model comparison

Journal Article · Mon Jul 02 00:00:00 EDT 2018 · Climatic Change · OSTI ID:1481100

Global economic consequences of deploying bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS)

Journal Article · Wed Aug 31 00:00:00 EDT 2016 · Environmental Research Letters · OSTI ID:1557600

Bioenergy Technologies in Long-Run Climate Change Mitigation: Results from the EMF-33 Study

Journal Article · Mon Aug 24 00:00:00 EDT 2020 · Climatic Change · OSTI ID:1665824

Related Subjects

09 BIOMASS FUELS
54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES

Bioenergy for climate change mitigation: Scale and sustainability

Citation Formats

References (246)

Similar Records

Related Subjects