skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Lowering post‐construction yield assessment uncertainty through better wind plant power curves

Journal Article · · Wind Energy
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1002/we.2645· OSTI ID:1786614

Abstract Many operational analyses of wind power plants require a statistical relationship, which can be called the wind plant power curve, to be developed between wind plant energy production and concurrent atmospheric variables. Currently, a univariate linear regression at monthly resolution is the industry standard for post‐construction yield assessments. Here, we evaluate the benefits in augmenting this conventional approach by testing alternative regressions performed with multiple inputs, at a finer time resolution, and using nonlinear machine‐learning algorithms. We utilize the National Renewable Energy Laboratory's open‐source software package OpenOA to assess wind plant power curves for 10 wind plants. When a univariate generalized additive model at daily or hourly resolution is used, regression uncertainty is reduced, in absolute terms, by up to 1.0 % and 1.2 % (corresponding to a −59 % and −80 % relative change), respectively, compared to a univariate linear regression at monthly resolution; also, a more accurate assessment of the mean long‐term wind plant production is achieved. Additional input variables also reduce the regression uncertainty: when temperature is added as an input to the conventional monthly linear regression, the operational analysis uncertainty connected to regression is reduced, in absolute terms, by up to 0.5 % (−43 % relative change) for wind power plants with strong seasonal variability. Adding input variables to the machine‐learning model at daily resolution can further reduce regression uncertainty, with up to a −10 % relative change. Based on these results, we conclude that a multivariate nonlinear regression at daily or hourly resolution should be recommended for assessing wind plant power curves.

Research Organization:
National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), Golden, CO (United States)
Sponsoring Organization:
USDOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE), Renewable Power Office. Wind Energy Technologies Office
Grant/Contract Number:
DE‐AC36‐08GO28308; AC36-08GO28308
OSTI ID:
1786614
Alternate ID(s):
OSTI ID: 1783555; OSTI ID: 1786616
Report Number(s):
NREL/JA-5000-78511
Journal Information:
Wind Energy, Journal Name: Wind Energy Vol. 25 Journal Issue: 1; ISSN 1095-4244
Publisher:
Wiley Blackwell (John Wiley & Sons)Copyright Statement
Country of Publication:
United Kingdom
Language:
English

References (24)

Variability in large-scale wind power generation: Variability in large-scale wind power generation journal October 2015
Learning a Wind Farm Power Curve with a Data-Driven Approach
  • Marvuglia, Antonino; Messineo, Antonio
  • World Renewable Energy Congress – Sweden, 8–13 May, 2011, Linköping, Sweden, Linköping Electronic Conference Proceedings https://doi.org/10.3384/ecp110574217
conference November 2011
Wind Resource Assessment book May 2012
Extremely randomized trees journal March 2006
Using machine learning to predict wind turbine power output journal April 2013
Climatological mean and interannual variance of United States surface wind speed, direction and velocity journal April 1999
The ERA5 global reanalysis journal June 2020
Monitoring of wind farms’ power curves using machine learning techniques journal October 2012
Stochastic gradient boosting journal February 2002
The importance of atmospheric turbulence and stability in machine-learning models of wind farm power production journal September 2019
Observations and simulations of diurnal cycles of near-surface wind speeds over land and sea journal September 1996
Synthetic wind speed scenarios including diurnal effects: Implications for wind power dimensioning journal January 2012
Wind power forecasting based on daily wind speed data using machine learning algorithms journal October 2019
Diagnosing wind turbine faults using machine learning techniques applied to operational data conference June 2016
What global reanalysis best represents near‐surface winds?
  • Ramon, Jaume; Lledó, Llorenç; Torralba, Verónica
  • Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, Vol. 145, Issue 724 https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3616
journal August 2019
The Modern-Era Retrospective Analysis for Research and Applications, Version 2 (MERRA-2) journal July 2017
Performance Sensitivity of a Wind Farm Power Curve Model to Different Signals of the Input Layer of ANNs: Case Studies in the Canary Islands journal March 2019
Operational-based annual energy production uncertainty: are its components actually uncorrelated? journal January 2020
Understanding Biases in Pre-Construction Estimates journal June 2018
The ERA-Interim reanalysis: configuration and performance of the data assimilation system journal April 2011
OpenOA: An Open-Source Codebase For Operational Analysis of Wind Farms journal February 2021
The NCEP Climate Forecast System Version 2 journal March 2014
Sequential Reliability Forecasting for Wind Energy: Temperature Dependence and Probability Distributions journal June 2010
The Probability Distribution of Sea Surface Wind Speeds. Part II: Dataset Intercomparison and Seasonal Variability journal February 2006