Department of Electrical Engineering University of Southern California Los Angeles California USA
Department of Electrical Engineering University of Southern California Los Angeles California USA, Department of Chemical Engineering and Material Science University of Southern California Los Angeles California USA
Sparse representations provide a flexible and parsimonious description of high‐dimensional model parameters for reconstructing subsurface flow property distributions from limited data. To further constrain ill‐posed inverse problems, group‐sparsity regularization can take advantage of possible relations among the entries of unknown sparse parameters when: (i) groups of sparse elements are either collectively active or inactive and (ii) only a small subset of the groups is needed to approximate the parameters of interest. Since subsurface properties exhibit strong spatial connectivity patterns they may lead to sparse descriptions that satisfy the above conditions. When these conditions are established, a group‐sparsity regularization can be invoked to facilitate the solution of the resulting inverse problem by promoting sparsity across the groups. The proposed regularization penalizes the number of groups that are active without promoting sparsity within each group. Two implementations are presented in this paper: one based on the multiresolution tree structure of Wavelet decomposition, without a need for explicit prior models, and another learned from explicit prior model realizations using sparse principal component analysis (SPCA). In each case, the approach first classifies the parameters of the inverse problem into groups with specific connectivity features, and then takes advantage of the grouped structure to recover the relevant patterns in the solution from the flow data. Several numerical experiments are presented to demonstrate the advantages of additional constraining power of group‐sparsity in solving ill‐posed subsurface model calibration problems.
Golmohammadi, Azarang, Khaninezhad, Mohammad‐Reza M., and Jafarpour, Behnam, "Group‐sparsity regularization for ill‐posed subsurface flow inverse problems," Water Resources Research 51, no. 10 (2015), https://doi.org/10.1002/2014WR016430
@article{osti_1785887,
author = {Golmohammadi, Azarang and Khaninezhad, Mohammad‐Reza M. and Jafarpour, Behnam},
title = {Group‐sparsity regularization for ill‐posed subsurface flow inverse problems},
annote = {Abstract Sparse representations provide a flexible and parsimonious description of high‐dimensional model parameters for reconstructing subsurface flow property distributions from limited data. To further constrain ill‐posed inverse problems, group‐sparsity regularization can take advantage of possible relations among the entries of unknown sparse parameters when: (i) groups of sparse elements are either collectively active or inactive and (ii) only a small subset of the groups is needed to approximate the parameters of interest. Since subsurface properties exhibit strong spatial connectivity patterns they may lead to sparse descriptions that satisfy the above conditions. When these conditions are established, a group‐sparsity regularization can be invoked to facilitate the solution of the resulting inverse problem by promoting sparsity across the groups. The proposed regularization penalizes the number of groups that are active without promoting sparsity within each group. Two implementations are presented in this paper: one based on the multiresolution tree structure of Wavelet decomposition, without a need for explicit prior models, and another learned from explicit prior model realizations using sparse principal component analysis (SPCA). In each case, the approach first classifies the parameters of the inverse problem into groups with specific connectivity features, and then takes advantage of the grouped structure to recover the relevant patterns in the solution from the flow data. Several numerical experiments are presented to demonstrate the advantages of additional constraining power of group‐sparsity in solving ill‐posed subsurface model calibration problems.},
doi = {10.1002/2014WR016430},
url = {https://www.osti.gov/biblio/1785887},
journal = {Water Resources Research},
issn = {ISSN 0043-1397},
number = {10},
volume = {51},
place = {United States},
publisher = {American Geophysical Union (AGU)},
year = {2015},
month = {10}}