Skip to main content
U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Adaptive Machine Learning for Robust Diagnostics and Control of Time-Varying Particle Accelerator Components and Beams

Journal Article · · Information
DOI:https://doi.org/10.3390/info12040161· OSTI ID:1776378

Machine learning (ML) is growing in popularity for various particle accelerator applications including anomaly detection such as faulty beam position monitor or RF fault identification, for non-invasive diagnostics, and for creating surrogate models. ML methods such as neural networks (NN) are useful because they can learn input-output relationships in large complex systems based on large data sets. Once they are trained, methods such as NNs give instant predictions of complex phenomenon, which makes their use as surrogate models especially appealing for speeding up large parameter space searches which otherwise require computationally expensive simulations. However, quickly time varying systems are challenging for ML-based approaches because the actual system dynamics quickly drifts away from the description provided by any fixed data set, degrading the predictive power of any ML method, and limits their applicability for real time feedback control of quickly time-varying accelerator components and beams. In contrast to ML methods, adaptive model-independent feedback algorithms are by design robust to un-modeled changes and disturbances in dynamic systems, but are usually local in nature and susceptible to local extrema. In this work, we propose that the combination of adaptive feedback and machine learning, adaptive machine learning (AML), is a way to combine the global feature learning power of ML methods such as deep neural networks with the robustness of model-independent control. We present an overview of several ML and adaptive control methods, their strengths and limitations, and an overview of AML approaches.

Sponsoring Organization:
USDOE
OSTI ID:
1776378
Alternate ID(s):
OSTI ID: 1829651
Journal Information:
Information, Journal Name: Information Journal Issue: 4 Vol. 12; ISSN INFOGG; ISSN 2078-2489
Publisher:
MDPI AGCopyright Statement
Country of Publication:
Switzerland
Language:
English

References (28)

Extremum seeking for optimal control problems with unknown time‐varying systems and unknown objective functions journal February 2020
Constrained extremum seeking stabilization of systems not affine in control: Extremum Seeking Stabilization of Systems Not Affine in Control journal July 2017
Some remarks on a conjecture in parameter adaptive control journal November 1983
Bounded extremum seeking with discontinuous dithers journal July 2016
OCELOT: A software framework for synchrotron light source and FEL studies
  • Agapov, I.; Geloni, G.; Tomin, S.
  • Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, Vol. 768 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2014.09.057
journal December 2014
Machine learning for beam dynamics studies at the CERN Large Hadron Collider
  • Arpaia, P.; Azzopardi, G.; Blanc, F.
  • Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, Vol. 985 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2020.164652
journal January 2021
Automation and control of laser wakefield accelerators using Bayesian optimization journal December 2020
Accurate and confident prediction of electron beam longitudinal properties using spectral virtual diagnostics journal February 2021
Online multi-objective particle accelerator optimization of the AWAKE electron beam line for simultaneous emittance and orbit control journal May 2020
Dynamic Programming and Lagrange Multipliers journal October 1956
On stability of linear time-varying systems journal February 1984
Genetic algorithm enhanced by machine learning in dynamic aperture optimization journal May 2018
Machine learning-based longitudinal phase space prediction of particle accelerators journal November 2018
Bayesian approach for linear optics correction journal January 2019
Model-independent tuning for maximizing free electron laser pulse energy journal August 2019
Machine learning for orders of magnitude speedup in multiobjective optimization of particle accelerator systems journal April 2020
Policy gradient methods for free-electron laser and terahertz source optimization and stabilization at the FERMI free-electron laser at Elettra journal December 2020
Sample-efficient reinforcement learning for CERN accelerator control journal December 2020
Multiobjective optimization of the dynamic aperture using surrogate models based on artificial neural networks journal January 2021
Demonstration of Model-Independent Control of the Longitudinal Phase Space of Electron Beams in the Linac-Coherent Light Source with Femtosecond Resolution journal July 2018
Bayesian Optimization of a Free-Electron Laser journal March 2020
Adaptive method for electron bunch profile prediction journal October 2015
A note on stability of linear time-varying systems journal April 1974
Adaptive stabilization of linear systems with unknown high-frequency gains journal June 1985
Minimum-Seeking for CLFs: Universal Semiglobally Stabilizing Feedback Under Unknown Control Directions journal May 2013
A general reinforcement learning algorithm that masters chess, shogi, and Go through self-play journal December 2018
On Nonintrusive Uncertainty Quantification and Surrogate Model Construction in Particle Accelerator Modeling journal January 2019
Basic Reinforcement Learning Techniques to Control the Intensity of a Seeded Free-Electron Laser journal May 2020

Similar Records

An adaptive approach to machine learning for compact particle accelerators
Journal Article · Tue Sep 28 00:00:00 EDT 2021 · Scientific Reports · OSTI ID:1822487

Related Subjects