skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Linear systematics mitigation in galaxy clustering in the Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Data

Journal Article · · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
ORCiD logo [1];  [1]; ORCiD logo [2]; ORCiD logo [3];  [4]; ORCiD logo [5]
  1. Department of Physics, University of Arizona, 1118 E. Fourth Street, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA
  2. Department of Astronomy and Steward Observatory, University of Arizona, 933 N Cherry Ave, Tucson, AZ 85719, USA
  3. Institut de Ciénces de l’Espai, IEEC-CSIC, Campus UAB, Carrer de Can Magrans, s/n, E-08193 Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain
  4. Center for Cosmology and Astro-Particle Physics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA, Department of Physics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
  5. Department of Physics, University of Michigan, 450 Church St, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1040, USA, Leinweber Center for Theoretical Physics, University of Michigan, 450 Church St, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1040, USA

ABSTRACT We implement a linear model for mitigating the effect of observing conditions and other sources of contamination in galaxy clustering analyses. Our treatment improves upon the fiducial systematics treatment of the Dark Energy Survey (DES) Year 1 (Y1) cosmology analysis in four crucial ways. Specifically, our treatment (1) does not require decisions as to which observable systematics are significant and which are not, allowing for the possibility of multiple maps adding coherently to give rise to significant bias even if no single map leads to a significant bias by itself, (2) characterizes both the statistical and systematic uncertainty in our mitigation procedure, allowing us to propagate said uncertainties into the reported cosmological constraints, (3) explicitly exploits the full spatial structure of the galaxy density field to differentiate between cosmology-sourced and systematics-sourced fluctuations within the galaxy density field, and (4) is fully automated, and can therefore be trivially applied to any data set. The updated correlation function for the DES Y1 redMaGiC catalogue minimally impacts the cosmological posteriors from that analysis. Encouragingly, our analysis does improve the goodness-of-fit statistic of the DES Y1 3 × 2pt data set (Δχ2 = −6.5 with no additional parameters). This improvement is due in nearly equal parts to both the change in the correlation function and the added statistical and systematic uncertainties associated with our method. We expect the difference in mitigation techniques to become more important in future work as the size of cosmological data sets grows.

Research Organization:
Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory (FNAL), Batavia, IL (United States)
Sponsoring Organization:
USDOE Office of Science (SC), High Energy Physics (HEP)
Contributing Organization:
DES Collaboration
Grant/Contract Number:
SC0015975; AC02-07CH11359
OSTI ID:
1774983
Alternate ID(s):
OSTI ID: 1693448
Report Number(s):
FERMILAB-PUB-20-480-AE; DES-2020-0563; arXiv:2009.10854
Journal Information:
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Journal Name: Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society Vol. 503 Journal Issue: 3; ISSN 0035-8711
Publisher:
Oxford University PressCopyright Statement
Country of Publication:
United Kingdom
Language:
English

References (48)

Astropy: A community Python package for astronomy journal September 2013
The Dark Energy Survey: more than dark energy – an overview journal March 2016
The Hyper Suprime-Cam SSP Survey: Overview and survey design journal September 2017
Galaxy halo masses and satellite fractions from galaxy-galaxy lensing in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey: stellar mass, luminosity, morphology and environment dependencies journal May 2006
The Sloan Digital Sky Survey: Technical Summary journal September 2000
KiDS-450 + 2dFLenS: Cosmological parameter constraints from weak gravitational lensing tomography and overlapping redshift-space galaxy clustering journal October 2017
Cosmological parameter constraints from galaxy–galaxy lensing and galaxy clustering with the SDSS DR7 journal April 2013
The Astropy Project: Building an Open-science Project and Status of the v2.0 Core Package journal August 2018
Introduction to the CFHT Legacy Survey final release (CFHTLS T0007)
  • Cuillandre, Jean-Charles J.; Withington, Kanoa; Hudelot, Patrick
  • SPIE Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation, SPIE Proceedings https://doi.org/10.1117/12.925584
conference September 2012
Unbiased methods for removing systematics from galaxy clustering measurements journal December 2015
No galaxy left behind: accurate measurements with the faintest objects in the Dark Energy Survey journal January 2016
The WiggleZ Dark Energy Survey: survey design and first data release journal January 2010
Clustering of Sloan Digital sky Survey iii Photometric Luminous Galaxies: the Measurement, Systematics, and Cosmological Implications journal November 2012
Efficient Computation of Cosmic Microwave Background Anisotropies in Closed Friedmann‐Robertson‐Walker Models journal August 2000
Probing the Universe with Weak Lensing journal September 1999
Dark Energy Survey year 1 results: Cosmological constraints from galaxy clustering and weak lensing journal August 2018
The SDSS-IV eBOSS: emission line galaxy catalogues at z ≈ 0.8 and study of systematic errors in the angular clustering journal October 2016
Improving galaxy clustering measurements with deep learning: analysis of the DECaLS DR7 data journal May 2020
Interpolation, realization, and reconstruction of noisy, irregularly sampled data journal October 1992
Stable clustering, the halo model and non-linear cosmological power spectra journal June 2003
The weak Lensing Signal and the Clustering of boss Galaxies. ii. Astrophysical and Cosmological Constraints journal June 2015
HEALPix: A Framework for High‐Resolution Discretization and Fast Analysis of Data Distributed on the Sphere journal April 2005
Revising the Halofit Model for the Nonlinear Matter Power Spectrum journal December 2012
Tomographic galaxy clustering with the Subaru Hyper Suprime-Cam first year public data release journal March 2020
KiDS+GAMA: cosmology constraints from a joint analysis of cosmic shear, galaxy–galaxy lensing, and angular clustering journal March 2018
Ameliorating systematic uncertainties in the angular clustering of galaxies: a study using the SDSS-III: Ameliorating systematic uncertainties in w(θ) journal September 2011
Joint analysis of gravitational lensing, clustering, and abundance: Toward the unification of large-scale structure analysis journal October 2012
The Galaxy-Mass Correlation Function Measured from Weak Lensing in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey journal May 2004
Increasing N eff with particles in thermal equilibrium with neutrinos journal December 2012
LSST: From Science Drivers to Reference Design and Anticipated Data Products journal March 2019
Planck 2013 results. XI. All-sky model of thermal dust emission journal October 2014
Weak Gravitational Lensing by Large-Scale Structure journal September 2003
The Sdss-Iv Extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: Luminous red Galaxy Target Selection journal June 2016
emcee : The MCMC Hammer
  • Foreman-Mackey, Daniel; Hogg, David W.; Lang, Dustin
  • Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, Vol. 125, Issue 925 https://doi.org/10.1086/670067
journal March 2013
healpy: equal area pixelization and spherical harmonics transforms for data on the sphere in Python journal March 2019
2D-FFTLog: efficient computation of real-space covariance matrices for galaxy clustering and weak lensing journal June 2020
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: The Photometric Data Set for Cosmology journal April 2018
CosmoSIS: Modular cosmological parameter estimation journal September 2015
KiDS-450: cosmological parameter constraints from tomographic weak gravitational lensing journal November 2016
cosmolike – cosmological likelihood analyses for photometric galaxy surveys journal May 2017
Extragalactic Imprints in Galactic Dust Maps journal January 2019
Dark Energy Survey year 1 results: Galaxy clustering for combined probes journal August 2018
The skewness of the aperture mass statistic journal July 2004
Bias and variance of angular correlation functions journal July 1993
Why your model parameter confidences might be too optimistic. Unbiased estimation of the inverse covariance matrix journal December 2006
Mitigating contamination in LSS surveys: a comparison of methods journal March 2021
An Ultra Fast Image Generator (UFig) for wide-field astronomy journal February 2013
Blinded challenge for precision cosmology with large-scale structure: Results from effective field theory for the redshift-space galaxy power spectrum journal December 2020

Similar Records

Systematic Biases in Weak Lensing Cosmology with the Dark Energy Survey
Thesis/Dissertation · Sun Jan 01 00:00:00 EST 2017 · OSTI ID:1774983

Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: galaxy clustering and systematics treatment for lens galaxy samples
Journal Article · Fri Jan 28 00:00:00 EST 2022 · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · OSTI ID:1774983

Exploiting non-linear scales in galaxy–galaxy lensing and galaxy clustering: A forecast for the dark energy survey
Journal Article · Tue Jan 04 00:00:00 EST 2022 · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · OSTI ID:1774983