Skip to main content
U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Improved Regional and TeleseismicP-Wave Travel-Time Prediction and Event Location Using a Global 3D Velocity Model

Journal Article · · Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1785/0120140272· OSTI ID:1769132
 [1];  [1];  [1];  [1]
  1. Lawrence Livermore National Lab. (LLNL), Livermore, CA (United States)

A global validation dataset of 116 seismic events and 20,977 associated Pn and P arrivals is used to assess travel-time prediction and event location accuracy for the global-scale, 3D, P-wave velocity model called LLNL-G3Dv3 (Simmons et al., 2012). Strong regional trends that are observed for ak135 travel-time residuals are largely removed when LLNL-G3Dv3 is used for prediction. The 25th–75th quantile spread of travel-time residuals is reduced by 30%–40% at teleseismic distances, and the spread is reduced by ~60% at regional distances (<16°). Epicenter error decreases when more data are used to constrain event locations until more than ~40 arrivals times are used. At which point, epicenter error reduction tends to plateau. Median epicenter errors for the ak135 and LLNL-G3Dv3 models plateau at ~8:0 and ~5:5 km, respectively, for teleseismic P datasets. Median epicenter errors for the ak135 and LLNL-G3Dv3 models plateau at ~12:0 and ~4:0 km, respectively, for regional Pn datasets. We demonstrate that spatially correlated travel-time residual errors for the ak135 model lead to increasing epicenter error when ~40 to ~100 Pn arrivals are used to constrain the location. The effect of correlated error is mitigated by LLNL-G3Dv3, for which epicenter error steadily decreases to ~4 km when 100 Pn arrivals are used. The median area of 0.95 epicenter probability bounds for ak135 and LLNL-G3Dv3 are 1811 and 758 km2, respectively. The ak135 ellipses are inflated to achieve the desired rate of true events occurring inside the probability region, whereas LLNLG3Dv3 error ellipses based on empirical residual distributions cover the true location at the expected rate because location bias is minimal.

Research Organization:
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL), Livermore, CA (United States)
Sponsoring Organization:
USDOE National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)
Grant/Contract Number:
AC52-07NA27344
OSTI ID:
1769132
Report Number(s):
LLNL-JRNL--659825; 780619
Journal Information:
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, Journal Name: Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America Journal Issue: 3 Vol. 105; ISSN 0037-1106
Publisher:
Seismological Society of AmericaCopyright Statement
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

Cited By (2)

Upper Crustal Weak Zone in Central Tibet: An Implication From Three‐Dimensional Seismic Velocity and Attenuation Tomography Results journal May 2019
Revision of earthquake hypocentre locations in global bulletin data sets using source-specific station terms journal October 2016

Similar Records

A crust and upper mantle model of Eurasia and North Africa for Pn travel time calculation
Journal Article · Thu Mar 19 00:00:00 EDT 2009 · Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America · OSTI ID:974862

Evaluation of seismic event location methods on the regional event location system (rels). Technical report
Technical Report · Wed Nov 25 23:00:00 EST 1981 · OSTI ID:6768368

Related Subjects