Collider probes of real triplet scalar dark matter

Chiang, Cheng-Wei; Cottin, Giovanna; Du, Yong; Fuyuto, Kaori; Ramsey-Musolf, Michael J.

doi:10.1007/jhep01(2021)198

Collider probes of real triplet scalar dark matter

Journal Article · Thu Jan 28 00:00:00 EST 2021 · Journal of High Energy Physics (Online)

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/jhep01(2021)198· OSTI ID:1768546

Chiang, Cheng-Wei ^[1]; Cottin, Giovanna ^[2]; ^[3]; ^[4]; Ramsey-Musolf, Michael J. ^[5]

National Taiwan Univ., Taipei (Taiwan); Academia Sinica, Taipei (Taiwan); National Center for Theoretical Sciences, Taipei (Taiwan)
Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez, Santiago (Chile); Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago (Chile)
Univ. of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA (United States)
Los Alamos National Lab. (LANL), Los Alamos, NM (United States)
Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ. (China); Univ. of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA (United States); California Inst. of Technology (CalTech), Pasadena, CA (United States)

We study discovery prospects for a real triplet extension of the Standard Model scalar sector at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) and a possible future 100 TeV $$\mathcal{pp}$$ collider. We focus on the scenario in which the neutral triplet scalar is stable and contributes to the dark matter relic density. When produced in $$\mathcal{pp}$$ collisions, the charged triplet scalar decays to the neutral component plus a soft pion or soft lepton pair, yielding a disappearing charged track in the detector. We recast current 13 TeV LHC searches for disappearing tracks, and find that the LHC presently excludes a real triplet scalar lighter than 248 (275) GeV, for a mass splitting of 172 (160) MeV with $$\mathcal{L}$$ = 36 fb^–1. The reach can extend to 497 (520) GeV with the collection of 3000 fb^–1. We extrapolate the 13 TeV analysis to a prospective 100 TeV pp collider, and find that a ~ 3 TeV triplet scalar could be discoverable with $$\mathcal{L}$$ = 30 ab^–1, depending on the degree to which pile up effects are under control. We also investigate the dark matter candidate in our model and corresponding present and prospective constraints from dark matter direct detection. We find that currently XENON1T can exclude a real triplet dark matter lighter than ~ 3 TeV for a Higgs portal coupling of order one or larger, and the future XENON20T will cover almost the entire dark matter viable parameter space except for vanishingly small portal coupling.

View Accepted Manuscript (DOE)

Research Organization:: Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL), Los Alamos, NM (United States)

Sponsoring Organization:: National Fund for Scientific and Technological Development (FONDECYT); National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC); Taiwan Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST); USDOE Laboratory Directed Research and Development (LDRD) Program

Grant/Contract Number:: 89233218CNA000001; SC0011095

OSTI ID:: 1768546

Report Number(s):: LA-UR--20-22358

Journal Information:: Journal of High Energy Physics (Online), Journal Name: Journal of High Energy Physics (Online) Journal Issue: 1 Vol. 2021; ISSN 1029-8479

Publisher:: Springer BerlinCopyright Statement

Country of Publication:: United States

Language:: English

References (84)

Erratum to: Closing the window for compressed dark sectors with disappearing charged tracks Mahbubani, Rakhi; Schwaller, Pedro; Zurita, José Journal of High Energy Physics, Vol. 2017, Issue 10 https://doi.org/10.1007/jhep10(2017)061	journal	October 2017
Cosmic abundances of stable particles: Improved analysis Gondolo, Paolo; Gelmini, Graciela Nuclear Physics B, Vol. 360, Issue 1 https://doi.org/10.1016/0550-3213(91)90438-4	journal	August 1991
Higgsino dark matter or not: Role of disappearing track searches at the LHC and future colliders Fukuda, Hajime; Nagata, Natsumi; Otono, Hidetoshi Physics Letters B, Vol. 781 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2018.03.088	journal	June 2018
Indirect studies of electroweakly interacting particles at 100 TeV hadron colliders Abe, Tomohiro; Chigusa, So; Ema, Yohei Physical Review D, Vol. 100, Issue 5 https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.100.055018	journal	September 2019
Gamma ray tests of Minimal Dark Matter Cirelli, Marco; Hambye, Thomas; Panci, Paolo arXiv https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1507.05519	text	January 2015
Probing the Higgs sector of $Y=0$ Higgs Triplet Model at LHC Chabab, M.; Peyranère, M. C.; Rahili, L. arXiv https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1805.00286	text	January 2018
Neutralino relic density including coannihilations Gondolo, Paolo; Edsjo, Joakim arXiv https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.hep-ph/9711461	text	January 1997
Revisiting slepton pair production at the Large Hadron Collider Fuks, Benjamin; Klasen, Michael; Lamprea, David R. Journal of High Energy Physics, Vol. 2014, Issue 1 https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP01(2014)168	journal	January 2014
Erratum to: Wino-like Minimal Dark Matter and future colliders Cirelli, Marco; Sala, Filippo; Taoso, Marco Journal of High Energy Physics, Vol. 2015, Issue 1 https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP01(2015)041	journal	January 2015
Probing new electroweak states via precision measurements at the LHC and future colliders Di Luzio, Luca; Gröber, Ramona; Panico, Giuliano Journal of High Energy Physics, Vol. 2019, Issue 1 https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP01(2019)011	journal	January 2019
Zero-range effective field theory for resonant wino dark matter. Part II. Coulomb resummation Braaten, Eric; Johnson, Evan; Zhang, Hong Journal of High Energy Physics, Vol. 2018, Issue 2 https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP02(2018)150	journal	February 2018
Electroweak multiplet dark matter at future lepton colliders Kadota, Kenji; Spray, Andrew Journal of High Energy Physics, Vol. 2019, Issue 2 https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP02(2019)017	journal	February 2019
LHC-friendly minimal freeze-in models Bélanger, G.; Desai, N.; Goudelis, A. Journal of High Energy Physics, Vol. 2019, Issue 2 https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP02(2019)186	journal	February 2019
Indirect probe of electroweak-interacting particles with mono-lepton signatures at hadron colliders Matsumoto, Shigeki; Shirai, Satoshi; Takeuchi, Michihisa Journal of High Energy Physics, Vol. 2019, Issue 3 https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP03(2019)076	journal	March 2019
Slepton pair production with aNNLO+NNLL precision Fiaschi, Juri; Klasen, Michael; Sunder, Marthijn Journal of High Energy Physics, Vol. 2020, Issue 4 https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP04(2020)049	journal	April 2020
Charged fermions below 100 GeV Egana-Ugrinovic, Daniel; Low, Matthew; Ruderman, Joshua T. Journal of High Energy Physics, Vol. 2018, Issue 5 https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP05(2018)012	journal	May 2018
Zero-range effective field theory for resonant wino dark matter. Part III. Annihilation effects Braaten, Eric; Johnson, Evan; Zhang, Hong Journal of High Energy Physics, Vol. 2018, Issue 5 https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP05(2018)062	journal	May 2018
Two-step electroweak symmetry-breaking: theory meets experiment Bell, Nicole F.; Dolan, Matthew J.; Friedrich, Leon S. Journal of High Energy Physics, Vol. 2020, Issue 5 https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP05(2020)050	journal	May 2020
QCD effects on direct detection of wino dark matter Hisano, Junji; Ishiwata, Koji; Nagata, Natsumi Journal of High Energy Physics, Vol. 2015, Issue 6 https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP06(2015)097	journal	June 2015
Indirect probe of electroweakly interacting particles at the high-luminosity Large Hadron Collider Matsumoto, Shigeki; Shirai, Satoshi; Takeuchi, Michihisa Journal of High Energy Physics, Vol. 2018, Issue 6 https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP06(2018)049	journal	June 2018
Direct detection of electroweak-interacting dark matter Hisano, Junji; Ishiwata, Koji; Nagata, Natsumi Journal of High Energy Physics, Vol. 2011, Issue 7 https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP07(2011)005	journal	July 2011
The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations Alwall, J.; Frederix, R.; Frixione, S. Journal of High Energy Physics, Vol. 2014, Issue 7 https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP07(2014)079	journal	July 2014
Scalar electroweak multiplet dark matter Chao, Wei; Ding, Gui-Jun; He, Xiao-Gang Journal of High Energy Physics, Vol. 2019, Issue 8 https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP08(2019)058	journal	August 2019
Indirect probe of electroweak-interacting particles at future lepton colliders Harigaya, Keisuke; Ichikawa, Koji; Kundu, Anirban Journal of High Energy Physics, Vol. 2015, Issue 9 https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP09(2015)105	journal	September 2015
The electroweak phase transition: a collider target Ramsey-Musolf, Michael J. Journal of High Energy Physics, Vol. 2020, Issue 9 https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP09(2020)179	journal	September 2020
Erratum to: Closing the window for compressed dark sectors with disappearing charged tracks Mahbubani, Rakhi; Schwaller, Pedro; Zurita, José Journal of High Energy Physics, Vol. 2017, Issue 10 https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP10(2017)061	journal	October 2017
Zero-range effective field theory for resonant wino dark matter. Part I. Framework Braaten, Eric; Johnson, Evan; Zhang, Hong Journal of High Energy Physics, Vol. 2017, Issue 11 https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP11(2017)108	journal	November 2017
Measuring relic abundance of minimal dark matter at hadron colliders Cao, QingHong; Gong, Ti; Xie, KePan Science China Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy, Vol. 62, Issue 8 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11433-018-9322-7	journal	April 2019
Supersymmetric dark matter Jungman, Gerard; Kamionkowski, Marc; Griest, Kim Physics Reports, Vol. 267, Issue 5-6 https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-1573(95)00058-5	journal	March 1996
Cold dark matter in the doublet-triplet model Pal, Palash B. Physics Letters B, Vol. 205, Issue 1 https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(88)90400-5	journal	April 1988
Coannihilation effects and relic abundance of higgsino-dominant LSPs Mizuta, Satoshi; Yamaguchi, Masahiro Physics Letters B, Vol. 298, Issue 1-2 https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(93)91717-2	journal	January 1993
CalcHEP 3.4 for collider physics within and beyond the Standard Model Belyaev, Alexander; Christensen, Neil D.; Pukhov, Alexander Computer Physics Communications, Vol. 184, Issue 7 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2013.01.014	journal	July 2013
micrOMEGAs_3: A program for calculating dark matter observables Bélanger, G.; Boudjema, F.; Pukhov, A. Computer Physics Communications, Vol. 185, Issue 3 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2013.10.016	journal	March 2014
An introduction to PYTHIA 8.2 Sjöstrand, Torbjörn; Ask, Stefan; Christiansen, Jesper R. Computer Physics Communications, Vol. 191 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2015.01.024	journal	June 2015
LanHEP — A package for automatic generation of Feynman rules from the Lagrangian. Version 3.2 Semenov, A. Computer Physics Communications, Vol. 201 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2016.01.003	journal	April 2016
Minimal dark matter Cirelli, Marco; Fornengo, Nicolao; Strumia, Alessandro Nuclear Physics B, Vol. 753, Issue 1-2 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2006.07.012	journal	October 2006
Cosmology and astrophysics of minimal dark matter Cirelli, Marco; Strumia, Alessandro; Tamburini, Matteo Nuclear Physics B, Vol. 787, Issue 1-2 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2007.07.023	journal	December 2007
Mixed Inert scalar triplet dark matter, radiative neutrino masses and leptogenesis Lu, Wen-Bin; Gu, Pei-Hong Nuclear Physics B, Vol. 924 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2017.09.005	journal	November 2017
CEPC precision of electroweak oblique parameters and weakly interacting dark matter: The scalar case Cai, Chengfeng; Yu, Zhao-Huan; Zhang, Hong-Hao Nuclear Physics B, Vol. 924 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2017.09.007	journal	November 2017
Non-perturbative effect on thermal relic abundance of dark matter Hisano, Junji; Matsumot, Shigeki; Nagai, Minoru Physics Letters B, Vol. 646, Issue 1 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2007.01.012	journal	March 2007
WIMPonium and boost factors for indirect dark matter detection March-Russell, John; West, Stephen M. Physics Letters B, Vol. 676, Issue 4-5 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2009.04.010	journal	June 2009
A complete calculation for direct detection of Wino dark matter Hisano, Junji; Ishiwata, Koji; Nagata, Natsumi Physics Letters B, Vol. 690, Issue 3 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2010.05.047	journal	June 2010
Mass splitting between charged and neutral winos at two-loop level Ibe, Masahiro; Matsumoto, Shigeki; Sato, Ryosuke Physics Letters B, Vol. 721, Issue 4-5 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2013.03.015	journal	April 2013
The strangeness content of the nucleon from effective field theory and phenomenology Alarcón, J. M.; Geng, L. S.; Martin Camalich, J. Physics Letters B, Vol. 730 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2014.01.065	journal	March 2014
Effective interaction of electroweak-interacting dark matter with Higgs boson and its phenomenology Hisano, Junji; Kobayashi, Daiki; Mori, Naoya Physics Letters B, Vol. 742 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2015.01.012	journal	March 2015
Probing electroweakly interacting massive particles with Drell–Yan process at 100 TeV hadron colliders Chigusa, So; Ema, Yohei; Moroi, Takeo Physics Letters B, Vol. 789 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2018.12.011	journal	February 2019
Particle dark matter: evidence, candidates and constraints Bertone, Gianfranco; Hooper, Dan; Silk, Joseph Physics Reports, Vol. 405, Issue 5-6 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2004.08.031	journal	January 2005
Matching matrix elements and shower evolution for top-pair production in hadronic collisions Mangano, Michelangelo L.; Moretti, Mauro; Piccinini, Fulvio Journal of High Energy Physics, Vol. 2007, Issue 01 https://doi.org/10.1088/1126-6708/2007/01/013	journal	January 2007
Scalar multiplet dark matter Hambye, T.; Ling, F. -S; Honorez, L. Lopez Journal of High Energy Physics, Vol. 2009, Issue 07 https://doi.org/10.1088/1126-6708/2009/07/090	journal	July 2009
Searching for long-lived particles beyond the Standard Model at the Large Hadron Collider Alimena, Juliette; Beacham, James; Borsato, Martino Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics, Vol. 47, Issue 9 https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6471/ab4574	journal	September 2020
Minimal dark matter: model and results Cirelli, Marco; Strumia, Alessandro New Journal of Physics, Vol. 11, Issue 10 https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/11/10/105005	journal	October 2009
The scalar singlet-triplet dark matter model Fischer, O.; van der Bij, J. J. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, Vol. 2014, Issue 01 https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2014/01/032	journal	January 2014
Scalar representations in the light of electroweak phase transition and cold dark matter phenomenology AbdusSalam, Shehu S.; Chowdhury, Talal Ahmed Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, Vol. 2014, Issue 05 https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2014/05/026	journal	May 2014
Bound-state formation for thermal relic dark matter and unitarity Harling, Benedict von; Petraki, Kalliopi Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, Vol. 2014, Issue 12 https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2014/12/033	journal	December 2014
Gamma ray tests of Minimal Dark Matter Cirelli, Marco; Hambye, Thomas; Panci, Paolo Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, Vol. 2015, Issue 10 https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2015/10/026	journal	October 2015
Capture and decay of electroweak WIMPonium Asadi, Pouya; Baumgart, Matthew; Fitzpatrick, Patrick J. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, Vol. 2017, Issue 02 https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2017/02/005	journal	February 2017
Cosmological implications of Dark Matter bound states Mitridate, Andrea; Redi, Michele; Smirnov, Juri Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, Vol. 2017, Issue 05 https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2017/05/006	journal	May 2017
Dark Matter's secret liaisons: phenomenology of a dark U(1) sector with bound states Cirelli, Marco; Panci, Paolo; Petraki, Kalliopi Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, Vol. 2017, Issue 05 https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2017/05/036	journal	May 2017
Tev-scale thermal WIMPs: Unitarity and its consequences Smirnov, Juri; Beacom, John F. Physical Review D, Vol. 100, Issue 4 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.100.043029	journal	August 2019
Indirect studies of electroweakly interacting particles at 100 TeV hadron colliders Abe, Tomohiro; Chigusa, So; Ema, Yohei Physical Review D, Vol. 100, Issue 5 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.100.055018	journal	September 2019
Three exceptions in the calculation of relic abundances Griest, Kim; Seckel, David Physical Review D, Vol. 43, Issue 10 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.43.3191	journal	May 1991
Neutralino-nucleon scattering reexamined Drees, Manuel; Nojiri, Mihoko M. Physical Review D, Vol. 48, Issue 8 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.48.3483	journal	October 1993
Neutralino relic density including coannihilations Edsjö, Joakim; Gondolo, Paolo Physical Review D, Vol. 56, Issue 4 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.56.1879	journal	August 1997
Bound states of weakly interacting dark matter Shepherd, William; Tait, Tim M. P.; Zaharijas, Gabrijela Physical Review D, Vol. 79, Issue 5 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.79.055022	journal	March 2009
Triplet scalars and dark matter at the LHC Fileviez Pérez, Pavel; Patel, Hiren H.; Ramsey-Musolf, Michael J. Physical Review D, Vol. 79, Issue 5 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.79.055024	journal	March 2009
Dark matter in inert triplet models Araki, Takeshi; Geng, C. Q.; Nagao, Keiko I. Physical Review D, Vol. 83, Issue 7 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.83.075014	journal	April 2011
Chiral representation of the π N scattering amplitude and the pion-nucleon sigma term Alarcón, J. M.; Camalich, J. Martin; Oller, J. A. Physical Review D, Vol. 85, Issue 5 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.85.051503	journal	March 2012
Triplet-singlet extension of the MSSM with a 125 GeV Higgs boson and dark matter Basak, Tanushree; Mohanty, Subhendra Physical Review D, Vol. 86, Issue 7 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.86.075031	journal	October 2012
Triplet scalar dark matter and leptogenesis in an inverse seesaw model of neutrino mass generation Josse-Michaux, François-Xavier; Molinaro, Emiliano Physical Review D, Vol. 87, Issue 3 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.87.036007	journal	February 2013
New physics in LHC Higgs boson pair production Dolan, Matthew J.; Englert, Christoph; Spannowsky, Michael Physical Review D, Vol. 87, Issue 5 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.87.055002	journal	March 2013
Study of Dirac fermionic dark matter Chua, Chun-Khiang; Hsieh, Ron-Chou Physical Review D, Vol. 88, Issue 3 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.88.036011	journal	August 2013
Standard model anatomy of WIMP dark matter direct detection. I. Weak-scale matching Hill, Richard J.; Solon, Mikhail P. Physical Review D, Vol. 91, Issue 4 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.91.043504	journal	February 2015
Standard Model anatomy of WIMP dark matter direct detection. II. QCD analysis and hadronic matrix elements Hill, Richard J.; Solon, Mikhail P. Physical Review D, Vol. 91, Issue 4 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.91.043505	journal	February 2015
Discrimination of dark matter models in future experiments Abe, Tomohiro; Kitano, Ryuichiro; Sato, Ryosuke Physical Review D, Vol. 91, Issue 9 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.91.095004	journal	May 2015
Perturbativity limits for scalar minimal dark matter with Yukawa interactions: Septuplet Cai, Chengfeng; Huang, Ze-Min; Kang, Zhaofeng Physical Review D, Vol. 92, Issue 11 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.92.115004	journal	December 2015
Effects of bound states on dark matter annihilation An, Haipeng; Wise, Mark B.; Zhang, Yue Physical Review D, Vol. 93, Issue 11 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.93.115020	journal	June 2016
Exploring fermionic dark matter via Higgs boson precision measurements at the Circular Electron Positron Collider Xiang, Qian-Fei; Bi, Xiao-Jun; Yin, Peng-Fei Physical Review D, Vol. 97, Issue 5 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.97.055004	journal	March 2018
Electroweak dark matter at future hadron colliders Han, Tao; Mukhopadhyay, Satyanarayan; Wang, Xing Physical Review D, Vol. 98, Issue 3 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.98.035026	journal	August 2018
Renormalization effects on electric dipole moments in electroweakly interacting massive particle models Kuramoto, Wataru; Kuwahara, Takumi; Nagai, Ryo Physical Review D, Vol. 99, Issue 9 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.99.095024	journal	May 2019
Dark Matter Results from 54-Ton-Day Exposure of PandaX-II Experiment Cui, Xiangyi; Abdukerim, Abdusalam; Chen, Wei Physical Review Letters, Vol. 119, Issue 18 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.181302	journal	October 2017
FastJet user manual: (for version 3.0.2) Cacciari, Matteo; Salam, Gavin P.; Soyez, Gregory The European Physical Journal C, Vol. 72, Issue 3 https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-012-1896-2	journal	March 2012
Exploring the hyperchargeless Higgs triplet model up to the Planck scale Khan, Najimuddin The European Physical Journal C, Vol. 78, Issue 4 https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-5766-4	journal	April 2018
Probing the Higgs sector of $$Y=0$$ Y = 0 Higgs triplet model at LHC Chabab, M.; Peyranère, M. C.; Rahili, L. The European Physical Journal C, Vol. 78, Issue 10 https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-6339-2	journal	October 2018
Discovery reach for wino and higgsino dark matter with a disappearing track signature at a 100 TeV pp collider Saito, Masahiko; Sawada, Ryu; Terashi, Koji The European Physical Journal C, Vol. 79, Issue 6 https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-6974-2	journal	June 2019

Cited By (1)

Systematic approach to $B$-physics anomalies and $t$-channel dark matter Arcadi, Giorgio; Calibbi, Lorenzo; Fedele, Marco arXiv https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2103.09835	text	January 2021

Similar Records

Excluding the light dark matter window of a 331 model using LHC and direct dark matter detection data

Journal Article · Sat Nov 01 00:00:00 EDT 2014 · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · OSTI ID:22375769

Two-step electroweak symmetry-breaking: theory meets experiment

Journal Article · Sun May 10 20:00:00 EDT 2020 · Journal of High Energy Physics (Online) · OSTI ID:1802207

Related Subjects

72 PHYSICS OF ELEMENTARY PARTICLES AND FIELDS
Atomic
nuclear and particle physics
Beyond Standard Model
Dark matter
Hadron-Hadron scattering (experiments)

Collider probes of real triplet scalar dark matter

Citation Formats

References (84)

Cited By (1)

Similar Records

Related Subjects