Skip to main content
U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Validation of the AltRAM Physics Models for use with Compressed Natural Gas

Technical Report ·
DOI:https://doi.org/10.2172/1763555· OSTI ID:1763555
 [1];  [2];  [2]
  1. North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC (United States)
  2. Sandia National Lab. (SNL-NM), Albuquerque, NM (United States)

The Alternative Fuels Risk Assessment Models (A1tRAM) toolkit combines Quantitative Risk Assessment (QRA) with simulations of unignited dispersion, ignited turbulent diffusion flames, and indoor accumulation with delayed ignition of fuels. The models of the physical phenomena need to be validated for each of the fuels in the toolkit. This report shows the validation for methane which is being used as a surrogate for natural gas. For the unignited dispersion model, seven previously published experiments from credible sources were used to validate. The validation looked at gas concentrations with respect to the distance from the release point. Four of these were underexpanded jets (i.e. release velocity equal to or greater than local speed of sound) and the other three subsonic releases. The methane plume model in AltRAM matched both varieties well, with higher accuracy for the underexpanded releases. For the jet flame model, we compared the heat flux and thermal radiation data reported from five separate turbulent jet flame experiments to the quantities calculated by A1tRAM. Four of the five datasets were for underexpanded diffusion jets flames. While the results still match well enough to give a good estimate of what is occurring, the error is higher than what was seen with the plume model. For the underexpanded flames A1tRAM provided reasonable approximations, which would lead to conservative risk assessments. Some modeling errors can be attributed to environmental effects (i.e. wind) since most large scale flame experiments are conducted outdoors. A1tRAM has been shown to be a reasonably accurate tool for calculating the concentration or flame properties of natural gas releases. Improvements could still be made for the plume of subsonic releases and radiative heat fluxes to reduce the conservative nature of these predictions. These models can provide valuable information for the risk assessment of natural gas infrastructure.

Research Organization:
Sandia National Laboratories (SNL-CA), Livermore, CA (United States)
Sponsoring Organization:
USDOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE), Transportation Office. Vehicle Technologies Office
DOE Contract Number:
AC04-94AL85000; NA0003525
OSTI ID:
1763555
Report Number(s):
SAND--2019-13408; 687116
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

Similar Records

Physics model validation of propane and methane for Hydrogen Plus Other Alternative Fuels Risk Assessment Models (HyRAM+)
Journal Article · Tue Feb 28 23:00:00 EST 2023 · Process Safety and Environmental Protection · OSTI ID:2311724

Validation of the HyRAM+ physics models for use with propane
Technical Report · Sun Feb 28 23:00:00 EST 2021 · OSTI ID:1821534

Hydrogen Plus Other Alternative Fuels Risk Assessment Models (HyRAM+) (Technical Reference Manual V.4)
Technical Report · Mon Nov 01 00:00:00 EDT 2021 · OSTI ID:1832082

Related Subjects