Skip to main content
U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Insights into the Structure–Activity Relationships in Metal–Organic Framework-Supported Nickel Catalysts for Ethylene Hydrogenation

Journal Article · · ACS Catalysis
 [1];  [2];  [3];  [2];  [3];  [2];  [2];  [2];  [2];  [2];  [4];  [2];  [3];  [3];  [2]
  1. South China Univ. of Technology, Guangzhou (China); Northwestern Univ., Evanston, IL (United States); University of Minnesota
  2. Northwestern Univ., Evanston, IL (United States)
  3. Univ. of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN (United States)
  4. South China Univ. of Technology, Guangzhou (China)

Solid supports play an indispensable role in heterogeneous catalysis, as they can directly affect the catalytic activity and selectivity of supported catalysts. However, the specific roles of such supports remain to be demystified owing to the difficulties in obtaining precise structural information on supported catalysts. To understand the effects of MOF topology, pore environment, and metal identity of node supports on the catalytic activity, a Ni catalyst was supported on eight Zr- or Hf-MOFs based on 8-connected nodes: namely M-NU-1200, M-NU-1000, M-NU-1008, and M-NU-1010 (M = Zr, Hf). Single-crystal X-ray diffraction (SCXRD), diffuse reflectance infrared Fourier transform spectroscopy (DRIFTS), and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) were employed to characterize the supported catalyst structures. To investigate the support effects on their activities, the supported Ni catalysts were evaluated by using ethylene hydrogenation as a model reaction. The results revealed that all Hf-based-MOF-supported Ni catalysts exhibited higher catalytic reactivity with TOF (turnover frequency) values at least double of those isostructural Zr counterparts. Additionally, MOFs with less congested metal anchoring sites, as a result of the topology and surrounding pore environment, yielded higher TOFs, suggesting the importance of supports in dictating both the catalyst accessibility and activity. Computational analysis complemented the experimental observations and provided insights into reaction barrier differences and their performance variation. Furthermore, this study demonstrates the essential role of the supports and provides a thought for selecting/designing suitable supports in heterogeneous catalysis.

Research Organization:
Univ. of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN (United States)
Sponsoring Organization:
USDOE Office of Science (SC), Basic Energy Sciences (BES); NSF
Grant/Contract Number:
SC0012702
OSTI ID:
1721720
Journal Information:
ACS Catalysis, Journal Name: ACS Catalysis Journal Issue: 16 Vol. 10; ISSN 2155-5435
Publisher:
American Chemical Society (ACS)Copyright Statement
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

References (46)

Heterogeneous Catalysis journal February 2015
Energy-adjustedab initio pseudopotentials for the second and third row transition elements journal January 1990
Support effect of zeolite on the methane combustion activity of palladium journal January 2003
Metal–organic frameworks: A tunable platform to access single-site heterogeneous catalysts journal September 2019
Structural and surface properties of heterogeneous catalysts: Nature of the oxide carrier and supported particle size effects journal May 2017
Luminescent sensors based on metal-organic frameworks journal January 2018
Catalytic applications of enzymes encapsulated in metal–organic frameworks journal February 2019
Metal–Organic Frameworks for Photocatalysis and Photothermal Catalysis journal December 2018
Effect of Redox “Non-Innocent” Linker on the Catalytic Activity of Copper-Catecholate-Decorated Metal–Organic Frameworks journal December 2017
Support Effects in Single-Atom Platinum Catalysts for Electrochemical Oxygen Reduction journal January 2017
Metal–Organic Frameworks in Solid–Gas Phase Catalysis journal November 2018
Introducing Nonstructural Ligands to Zirconia-like Metal–Organic Framework Nodes To Tune the Activity of Node-Supported Nickel Catalysts for Ethylene Hydrogenation journal March 2019
Highly Selective Heterogeneous Ethylene Dimerization with a Scalable and Chemically Robust MOF Catalyst journal March 2019
How to Conceptualize Catalytic Cycles? The Energetic Span Model journal February 2011
Unraveling the Role of Metal–Support Interactions in Heterogeneous Catalysis: Oxygenate Selectivity in Fischer–Tropsch Synthesis journal November 2013
A Hafnium-Based Metal–Organic Framework as an Efficient and Multifunctional Catalyst for Facile CO2 Fixation and Regioselective and Enantioretentive Epoxide Activation
  • Beyzavi, M. Hassan; Klet, Rachel C.; Tussupbayev, Samat
  • Journal of the American Chemical Society, Vol. 136, Issue 45, p. 15861-15864 https://doi.org/10.1021/ja508626n
journal October 2014
Sintering-Resistant Single-Site Nickel Catalyst Supported by Metal–Organic Framework journal February 2016
Protecting-Group-Free Site-Selective Reactions in a Metal–Organic Framework Reaction Vessel journal April 2018
Single-Atom-Based Vanadium Oxide Catalysts Supported on Metal–Organic Frameworks: Selective Alcohol Oxidation and Structure–Activity Relationship journal June 2018
Zirconium-Based Metal–Organic Frameworks for the Removal of Protein-Bound Uremic Toxin from Human Serum Albumin journal January 2019
Vanadium Catalyst on Isostructural Transition Metal, Lanthanide, and Actinide Based Metal–Organic Frameworks for Alcohol Oxidation journal May 2019
Self-Assembly of Catalytically Active Supramolecular Coordination Compounds within Metal–Organic Frameworks journal May 2019
Crystallographic Visualization of Postsynthetic Nickel Clusters into Metal–Organic Framework journal August 2019
Defining the Proton Topology of the Zr6-Based Metal–Organic Framework NU-1000 journal October 2014
Catalytic chemoselective functionalization of methane in a metal−organic framework journal May 2018
Luminescent metal–organic frameworks for chemical sensing and explosive detection journal January 2014
Understanding catalysis journal January 2014
Magnetic ordering in TCNQ-based metal–organic frameworks with host–guest interactions journal January 2015
Evaluation of Brønsted acidity and proton topology in Zr- and Hf-based metal–organic frameworks using potentiometric acid–base titration journal January 2016
An investigation of the effect of carbon support on ruthenium/carbon catalysts for lactic acid and butanone hydrogenation journal January 2016
Metal–organic and covalent organic frameworks as single-site catalysts journal January 2017
Gas/vapour separation using ultra-microporous metal–organic frameworks: insights into the structure/separation relationship journal January 2017
Revisiting the structural homogeneity of NU-1000, a Zr-based metal–organic framework journal January 2018
Carbon capture and conversion using metal–organic frameworks and MOF-based materials journal January 2019
Topology and porosity control of metal–organic frameworks through linker functionalization journal January 2019
Balanced basis sets of split valence, triple zeta valence and quadruple zeta valence quality for H to Rn: Design and assessment of accuracy journal January 2005
Accurate Coulomb-fitting basis sets for H to Rn journal January 2006
A density-functional model of the dispersion interaction journal October 2005
A new local density functional for main-group thermochemistry, transition metal bonding, thermochemical kinetics, and noncovalent interactions journal November 2006
Ab initiomolecular dynamics for liquid metals journal January 1993
Ab initio molecular-dynamics simulation of the liquid-metal–amorphous-semiconductor transition in germanium journal May 1994
Projector augmented-wave method journal December 1994
Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set journal October 1996
Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple journal October 1996
Perdew, Burke, and Ernzerhof Reply: journal January 1998
Atomically Dispersed Supported Metal Catalysts journal July 2012