skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: An Evaluation of the Economic and Resilience Benefits of a Microgrid in Northampton, Massachusetts

Journal Article · · Energies
DOI:https://doi.org/10.3390/en13184802· OSTI ID:1660320
; ORCiD logo; ORCiD logo; ORCiD logo; ;

Recent developments and advances in distributed energy resource (DER) technologies make them valuable assets in microgrids. This paper presents an innovative evaluation framework for microgrid assets to capture economic benefits from various grid and behind-the-meter services in grid-connecting mode and resilience benefits in islanding mode. In particular, a linear programming formulation is used to model different services and DER operational constraints to determine the optimal DER dispatch to maximize economic benefits. For the resiliency analysis, a stochastic evaluation procedure is proposed to explicitly quantify the microgrid survivability against a random outage, considering uncertainties associated with photovoltaic (PV) generation, system load, and distributed generator failures. Optimal coordination strategies are developed to minimize unserved energy and improve system survivability, considering different levels of system connectedness. The proposed framework has been applied to evaluate a proposed microgrid in Northampton, Massachusetts that would link the Northampton Department of Public Works, Cooley Dickenson Hospital, and Smith Vocational Area High School. The findings of this analysis indicate that over a 20-year economic life, a 441 kW/441 kWh battery energy storage system, and 386 kW PV solar array can generate $2.5 million in present value benefits, yielding a 1.16 return on investment ratio. Results of this study also show that forming a microgrid generally improves system survivability, but the resilience performance of individual facilities varies depending on power-sharing strategies.

Research Organization:
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL), Richland, WA (United States)
Sponsoring Organization:
USDOE Office of Nuclear Energy (NE)
Grant/Contract Number:
AC05-76RL01830
OSTI ID:
1660320
Alternate ID(s):
OSTI ID: 1686068
Report Number(s):
PNNL-SA-155031; PII: en13184802
Journal Information:
Energies, Journal Name: Energies Vol. 13 Journal Issue: 18; ISSN 1996-1073
Publisher:
MDPI AGCopyright Statement
Country of Publication:
Switzerland
Language:
English

References (13)

Co-optimization of energy and reserve in standalone micro-grid considering uncertainties journal June 2019
Distributed energy resource planning for microgrids in the united states conference October 2015
An energy storage assessment: Using optimal control strategies to capture multiple services conference July 2015
Assigning value to energy storage systems at multiple points in an electrical grid journal January 2018
Resiliency-Oriented Microgrid Optimal Scheduling journal July 2014
Optimal sizing of a solar-plus-storage system for utility bill savings and resiliency benefits conference September 2016
Co-Optimization Scheme for Distributed Energy Resource Planning in Community Microgrids journal October 2017
Optimal energy management of wind power generation system in islanded microgrid system conference September 2013
Mixed integer programming based battery sizing journal February 2014
Microgrids with energy storage systems as a means to increase power resilience: An application to office buildings journal April 2019
State of the Art in Research on Microgrids: A Review journal January 2015
Stochastic Capacity Expansion Planning of Remote Microgrids With Wind Farms and Energy Storage journal April 2015
Impacts of valuing resilience on cost-optimal PV and storage systems for commercial buildings journal November 2018

Figures / Tables (34)

Figure 1(p. 3)figure Figure 1
Figure 2(p. 4)figure Figure 2
Figure 3(p. 5)figure Figure 3
Figure 4(p. 6)figure Figure 4
Figure 5(p. 7)figure Figure 5
Figure 6(p. 8)figure Figure 6
Figure 7(p. 8)figure Figure 7
Figure 8(p. 9)figure Figure 8
Table 1(p. 10)table Table 1
Table 2(p. 10)table Table 2
Figure 9(p. 11)figure Figure 9
Figure 10(p. 12)figure Figure 10
Figure 11(p. 12)figure Figure 11
Table 3(p. 13)table Table 3
Table 4(p. 13)table Table 4
Table 5(p. 13)table Table 5
Figure 12(p. 15)figure Figure 12
Figure 13(p. 17)figure Figure 13
Table 6(p. 17)table Table 6
Figure 14(p. 18)figure Figure 14
Figure 15(p. 19)figure Figure 15
Table 7(p. 19)table Table 7
Table 10(p. 20)table Table 10
Table 8(p. 20)table Table 8
Table 9(p. 20)table Table 9
Table 11(p. 21)table Table 11
Table 12(p. 21)table Table 12
Figure 16(p. 22)figure Figure 16
Table 13(p. 22)table Table 13
Table 14(p. 22)table Table 14
Table 15(p. 23)table Table 15
Table 16(p. 23)table Table 16
Table 17(p. 23)table Table 17
Table 18(p. 23)table Table 18

Similar Records

Related Subjects

25 ENERGY STORAGE
economic analysis
energy storage systems
microgrid
resilience