Skip to main content
U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

The Economic Accessibility of CO2 Sequestration through Bioenergy with Carbon Capture and Storage (BECCS) in the US

Journal Article · · Land
DOI:https://doi.org/10.3390/land9090299· OSTI ID:1651164

Bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) is one strategy to remove CO2 from the atmosphere. To assess the potential scale and cost of CO2 sequestration from BECCS in the US, this analysis models carbon sequestration net of supply chain emissions and costs of biomass production, delivery, power generation, and CO2 capture and sequestration in saline formations. The analysis includes two biomass supply scenarios (near-term and long-term), two biomass logistics scenarios (conventional and pelletized), and two generation technologies (pulverized combustion and integrated gasification combined cycle). Results show marginal cost per tonne CO2 (accounting for costs of electricity and CO2 emissions of reference power generation scenarios) as a function of CO2 sequestered (simulating capture of up to 90% of total CO2 sequestration potential) and associated spatial distribution of resources and generation locations for the array of scenario options. Under a near-term scenario using up to 206 million tonnes per year of biomass, up to 181 million tonnes CO2 can be sequestered annually at scenario-average costs ranging from $62 to $137 per tonne CO2; under a long-term scenario using up to 740 million tonnes per year of biomass, up to 737 million tonnes CO2 can be sequestered annually at scenario-average costs ranging from $42 to $92 per tonne CO2. These estimates of CO2 sequestration potential may be reduced if future competing demand reduces resource availability or may be increased if displaced emissions from conventional power sources are included. Results suggest there are large-scale opportunities to implement BECCS at moderate cost in the US, particularly in the Midwest, Plains States, and Texas.

Research Organization:
Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States)
Sponsoring Organization:
USDOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE); USDOE Office of Nuclear Energy (NE)
Grant/Contract Number:
AC05-00OR22725
OSTI ID:
1651164
Alternate ID(s):
OSTI ID: 1651317
Journal Information:
Land, Journal Name: Land Journal Issue: 9 Vol. 9; ISSN 2073-445X
Publisher:
MDPICopyright Statement
Country of Publication:
Switzerland
Language:
English

References (36)

An assessment of the potential products and economic and environmental impacts resulting from a billion ton bioeconomy journal November 2016
Assessment of the feedstock supply for siting single‐ and multiple‐feedstock biorefineries in the USA and identification of prevalent feedstocks journal February 2020
Environmental Indicators of Biofuel Sustainability: What About Context? journal July 2012
Opportunities and Challenges in the Design and Analysis of Biomass Supply Chains journal June 2015
Impacts and management implications of ice storms on forests in the southern United States journal December 2003
Adapting a GIS-based multicriteria decision analysis approach for evaluating new power generating sites journal August 2012
Sustainable agricultural residue removal for bioenergy: A spatially comprehensive US national assessment journal February 2013
Integrated techno-economic and environmental assessments of sixty scenarios for co-firing biomass with coal and natural gas journal May 2016
Modeling state-level soil carbon emission factors under various scenarios for direct land use change associated with United States biofuel feedstock production journal August 2013
Indicators to support environmental sustainability of bioenergy systems journal September 2011
Correcting a fundamental error in greenhouse gas accounting related to bioenergy journal June 2012
Beneficial land use change: Strategic expansion of new biomass plantations can reduce environmental impacts from EU agriculture journal January 2020
Incorporating bioenergy into sustainable landscape designs journal April 2016
Biomass enables the transition to a carbon-negative power system across western North America journal February 2015
Europe’s renewable energy directive poised to harm global forests journal September 2018
Near-term deployment of carbon capture and sequestration from biorefineries in the United States journal April 2018
Geospatial analysis of near-term potential for carbon-negative bioenergy in the United States journal March 2018
Subfield profitability analysis reveals an economic case for cropland diversification journal January 2016
Landscape configuration is the primary driver of impacts on water quality associated with agricultural expansion journal July 2016
Operational water consumption and withdrawal factors for electricity generating technologies: a review of existing literature journal December 2012
Negative emissions—Part 2: Costs, potentials and side effects journal May 2018
Perennials in Flood-Prone Areas of Agricultural Landscapes: A Climate Adaptation Strategy journal February 2020
A Case Study on the Economics of Thinning in the Wildland Urban Interface journal January 2004
Reconciling food security and bioenergy: priorities for action journal June 2016
Targeted subfield switchgrass integration could improve the farm economy, water quality, and bioenergy feedstock production journal October 2017
Where can switchgrass production be more profitable than corn and soybean? An integrated subfield assessment in Iowa, USA journal May 2018
Serious mismatches continue between science and policy in forest bioenergy journal September 2019
Crop-based biofuels and associated environmental concerns journal June 2012
Beneficial Biofuels--The Food, Energy, and Environment Trilemma journal July 2009
Fixing a Critical Climate Accounting Error journal October 2009
Do biofuel policies seek to cut emissions by cutting food? journal March 2015
2016 Billion-Ton Report: Advancing Domestic Resources for a Thriving Bioeconomy, Volume 2: Environmental Sustainability Effects of Select Scenarios from Volume 1 report January 2017
Getting to Neutral: Options for Negative Carbon Emissions in California report January 2020
Woody Feedstock 2018 State of Technology Report report September 2018
Economies of Scale: Some Statistical Evidence journal May 1959
U. S. DOE's Economic Approaches and Resources for Evaluating the Cost of Implementing Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage (CCUS) journal December 2017