Skip to main content
U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Machine-learning Classifiers for Intermediate Redshift Emission-line Galaxies

Journal Article · · The Astrophysical Journal (Online)
 [1];  [1];  [2];  [3];  [4];  [5];  [6];  [7]
  1. Lawrence Berkeley National Lab. (LBNL), Berkeley, CA (United States)
  2. Univ. of Pittsburgh, PA (United States)
  3. Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas (CSIC), Madrid (Spain); Autonomous Univ. of Madrid (Spain); Max Planck Inst. fuer Extraterrestrische Physik, Garching (Germany)
  4. Ecole Polytechnique Federale Lausanne (Switzerland)
  5. National Autonomous Univ. of Mexico, Mexico City (Mexico)
  6. Ecole Polytechnique Federale Lausanne (Switzerland); Aix Marseille Univ. (France)
  7. Univ. of Kentucky, Lexington, KY (United States)
Classification of intermediate redshift (z = 0.3-0.8) emission line galaxies as star-forming galaxies, composite galaxies, active galactic nuclei (AGNs), or low-ionization nuclear emission regions (LINERs) using optical spectra alone was impossible because the lines used for standard optical diagnostic diagrams: [N ii], Hα, and [S ii] are redshifted out of the observed wavelength range. In this work, we address this problem using four supervised machine-learning classification algorithms: k-nearest neighbors (KNN), support vector classifier (SVC), random forest (RF), and a multilayer perceptron (MLP) neural network. For input features, we use properties that can be measured from optical galaxy spectra out to z < 0.8 - [O iii]/Hβ, [O ii]/Hβ, [O iii] line width, and stellar velocity dispersion - and four colors (u - g, g - r, r - i, and i - z) corrected to z = 0.1. The labels for the low redshift emission line galaxy training set are determined using standard optical diagnostic diagrams. RF has the best area under curve score for classifying all four galaxy types, meaning the highest distinguishing power. Both the AUC scores and accuracies of the other algorithms are ordered as MLP > SVC > KNN. The classification accuracies with all eight features (and the four spectroscopically determined features only) are 93.4% (92.3%) for star-forming galaxies, 69.4% (63.7%) for composite galaxies, 71.8% (67.3%) for AGNs, and 65.7% (60.8%) for LINERs. The stacked spectrum of galaxies of the same type as determined by optical diagnostic diagrams at low redshift and RF at intermediate redshift are broadly consistent. Our publicly available code (https://github.com/zkdtc/MLC_ELGs) and trained models will be instrumental for classifying emission line galaxies in upcoming wide-field spectroscopic surveys.
Research Organization:
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), Berkeley, CA (United States)
Sponsoring Organization:
Alfred P. Sloan Foundation; USDOE Office of Science (SC), High Energy Physics (HEP)
Grant/Contract Number:
AC02-05CH11231
OSTI ID:
1650076
Journal Information:
The Astrophysical Journal (Online), Journal Name: The Astrophysical Journal (Online) Journal Issue: 1 Vol. 883; ISSN 1538-4357
Publisher:
Institute of Physics (IOP)Copyright Statement
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

References (65)

Basic principles of ROC analysis journal October 1978
The use of the area under the ROC curve in the evaluation of machine learning algorithms journal July 1997
An introduction to ROC analysis journal June 2006
An experimental comparison of performance measures for classification journal January 2009
A Simple Generalisation of the Area Under the ROC Curve for Multiple Class Classification Problems journal January 2001
Random forest-based prediction of stroke outcome journal May 2021
The 2dF QSO Redshift Survey -- I. The optical luminosity function of quasi-stellar objects journal October 2000
Spectral classification of emission-line galaxies from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey: I. An improved classification for high-redshift galaxies journal January 2010
Spectral classification of emission-line galaxies from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey: II. A supplementary diagnostic for AGNs using the D n (4000) index journal June 2011
Classification parameters for the emission-line spectra of extragalactic objects journal February 1981
Spectral Classification of Emission-Line Galaxies journal November 1986
Spectral classification of emission-line galaxies journal February 1987
The Sloan Digital Sky Survey: Technical Summary journal September 2000
A Survey of Galaxy Kinematics to z ∼1 in the TKRS/GOODS‐N Field. I. Rotation and Dispersion Properties journal December 2006
K -Corrections and Filter Transformations in the Ultraviolet, Optical, and Near-Infrared journal January 2007
Aegis: Demographics of X-Ray and Optically Selected Active Galactic Nuclei journal January 2011
A NEW DIAGNOSTIC OF ACTIVE GALACTIC NUCLEI: REVEALING HIGHLY ABSORBED SYSTEMS AT REDSHIFT >0.3 journal July 2011
The optx Project. v. Identifying Distant Active Galactic Nuclei journal November 2011
Widespread and Hidden Active Galactic Nuclei in Star-Forming Galaxies at Redshift >0.3 journal February 2013
Theoretical Evolution of Optical Strong Lines Across Cosmic time journal August 2013
THE MOSFIRE DEEP EVOLUTION FIELD (MOSDEF) SURVEY: REST-FRAME OPTICAL SPECTROSCOPY FOR ∼1500 H -SELECTED GALAXIES AT $1.37\leqslant z\leqslant 3.8$ journal May 2015
TESTING DIAGNOSTICS OF NUCLEAR ACTIVITY AND STAR FORMATION IN GALAXIES AT z > 1 journal December 2012
The Cosmic bpt Diagram: Confronting Theory with Observations journal August 2013
The Canada-France Redshift Survey -- XII. Nature of emission-line field galaxy population up to z = 0.3 journal August 1996
New diagnostic methods for emission-line galaxies in deep surveys journal August 1997
Rotation-invariant convolutional neural networks for galaxy morphology prediction journal April 2015
The evolution of the [O ii], H β and [O iii] emission line luminosity functions over the last nine billions years journal June 2016
Finding strong lenses in CFHTLS using convolutional neural networks journal June 2017
Finding strong gravitational lenses in the Kilo Degree Survey with Convolutional Neural Networks journal August 2017
An automatic taxonomy of galaxy morphology using unsupervised machine learning journal September 2017
Noise estimates for measurements of weak lensing from the Ly α forest journal March 2018
Finding high-redshift strong lenses in DES using convolutional neural networks journal January 2019
Extragalactic science, cosmology, and Galactic archaeology with the Subaru Prime Focus Spectrograph journal February 2014
The host galaxies of active galactic nuclei journal December 2003
Machine learning and image analysis for morphological galaxy classification journal March 2004
Semi-empirical analysis of Sloan Digital Sky Survey galaxies - III. How to distinguish AGN hosts journal September 2006
The host galaxies and classification of active galactic nuclei journal November 2006
Galaxy Zoo 1: data release of morphological classifications for nearly 900 000 galaxies★: Galaxy Zoo journal November 2010
Stellar population models at high spectral resolution: High-resolution stellar population models journal November 2011
Evolution of the most massive galaxies to z= 0.6 - I. A new method for physical parameter estimation: Evolution of the most massive galaxies journal January 2012
Prime Focus Spectrograph (PFS) for the Subaru telescope: overview, recent progress, and future perspectives conference August 2016
4MOST: 4-metre multi-object spectroscopic telescope conference October 2012
Three-way ROCs journal January 1999
Sloan Digital Sky Survey IV: Mapping the Milky Way, Nearby Galaxies, and the Distant Universe text January 2017
The Sdss-Iv Extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: Overview and Early data journal February 2016
THE MOSDEF SURVEY: ELECTRON DENSITY AND IONIZATION PARAMETER AT z ∼ 2.3 journal December 2015
Sloan Digital Sky Survey IV: Mapping the Milky Way, Nearby Galaxies, and the Distant Universe journal June 2017
Overview of the DESI Legacy Imaging Surveys journal April 2019
The Mosdef Survey: agn Multi-Wavelength Identification, Selection Biases, and host Galaxy Properties journal January 2017
LensFlow: A Convolutional Neural Network in Search of Strong Gravitational Lenses journal March 2018
A New Diagnostic Diagram of Ionization Sources for High-redshift Emission Line Galaxies journal April 2018
The Fifteenth Data Release of the Sloan Digital Sky Surveys: First Release of MaNGA-derived Quantities, Data Visualization Tools, and Stellar Library journal January 2019
Spectral classification of emission-line galaxies from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. I. An improved classification for high redshift galaxies text January 2009
The Cosmic BPT Diagram: Confronting Theory with Observations text January 2013
The SDSS-IV extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: Overview and Early Data text January 2015
Prime Focus Spectrograph (PFS) for the Subaru Telescope: Overview, recent progress, and future perspectives text January 2016
Finding Strong Gravitational Lenses in the Kilo Degree Survey with Convolutional Neural Networks text January 2017
Sloan Digital Sky Survey IV: Mapping the Milky Way, Nearby Galaxies, and the Distant Universe text January 2017
Finding strong lenses in CFHTLS using convolutional neural networks text January 2017
LensExtractor: A Convolutional Neural Network in Search of Strong Gravitational Lenses text January 2017
Overview of the DESI Legacy Imaging Surveys text January 2018
Finding high-redshift strong lenses in DES using convolutional neural networks text January 2018
Semi-empirical analysis of Sloan Digital Sky Survey galaxies III. How to distinguish AGN hosts text January 2006
A Survey of Galaxy Kinematics to z ~ 1 in the TKRS/GOODS-N Field. I. Rotation and Dispersion Properties text January 2006
New diagnostic methods for emission-line galaxies in deep surveys text January 1997

Similar Records

Nebular excitation in z ∼ 2 star-forming galaxies from the SINS and LUCI surveys: The influence of shocks and active galactic nuclei
Journal Article · Sun Jan 19 23:00:00 EST 2014 · Astrophysical Journal · OSTI ID:22348181

THE MOSDEF SURVEY: OPTICAL ACTIVE GALACTIC NUCLEUS DIAGNOSTICS AT z ∼ 2.3
Journal Article · Sat Feb 28 23:00:00 EST 2015 · Astrophysical Journal · OSTI ID:22522045

THE COSMIC BPT DIAGRAM: CONFRONTING THEORY WITH OBSERVATIONS
Journal Article · Sun Sep 01 00:00:00 EDT 2013 · Astrophysical Journal Letters · OSTI ID:22136536