skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Finite element simulations of 3D planar hydraulic fracture propagation using a coupled hydro‐mechanical interface element

Journal Article · · International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.3116· OSTI ID:1644344
ORCiD logo [1]; ORCiD logo [1]
  1. Reservoir Geomechanics &, Seismicity Research Group, Mewbourne School of Petroleum and Geological Engineering The University of Oklahoma Norman Oklahoma USA

Summary Two‐dimensional hydraulic fracturing simulations using the cohesive zone model (CZM) can be readily found in the literature; however, to our knowledge, verified 3D cohesive zone modeling is not available. We present the development of a 3D fully coupled hydro‐mechanical finite element method (FEM) model (with parallel computation framework) and its application to hydraulic fracturing. A special zero‐thickness interface element based on the CZM is developed for modeling fracture propagation and fluid flow. A local traction‐separation law with strain softening is used to capture tensile cracking. The model is verified by considering penny‐shaped hydraulic fracture and plain strain Kristianovich‑Geertsma‑de Klerk hydraulic fracture (in 3D) in the viscosity‐ and toughness‐dominated regimes. Good agreement between numerical results and analytical solutions has been achieved. The model is used to investigate the influence of rock and fluid properties on hydraulic fracturing. Lower stiffness tip cohesive elements tend to yield a larger elastic deformation around the fracture tips before the tensile strength is reached, generating a larger fracture length and lower fracture pressure compared with higher stiffness elements. It is found that the energy release rate has almost no influence on hydraulic fracturing in the viscosity‐dominated regime because the energy spent in creating new fractures is too small when compared with the total input energy. For the toughness‐dominated regime, the released energy during fracturing should be accurately captured; relatively large tensile strength should be used in order to match numerical results to the asymptotic analytical solutions. It requires smaller elements when compared with those used in the viscosity‐dominated regime.

Sponsoring Organization:
USDOE
OSTI ID:
1644344
Journal Information:
International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, Journal Name: International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics Vol. 44 Journal Issue: 15; ISSN 0363-9061
Publisher:
Wiley Blackwell (John Wiley & Sons)Copyright Statement
Country of Publication:
United Kingdom
Language:
English
Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 12 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

References (39)

Propagation of a penny-shaped fluid-driven fracture in an impermeable rock: asymptotic solutions journal December 2002
Physics-based modeling of brittle fracture: cohesive formulations and the application of meshfree methods journal December 2001
An engineering solution for mesh size effects in the simulation of delamination using cohesive zone models journal July 2007
A three-dimensional analysis of simultaneous and sequential fracturing of horizontal wells journal October 2016
Finite element modelling of viscosity-dominated hydraulic fractures journal June 2012
Propagation Regimes of Fluid-Driven Fractures in Impermeable Rocks journal March 2004
A numerical procedure for simulation of hydraulically-driven fracture propagation in poroelastic media journal January 1990
A continuation method for rigid-cohesive fracture in a discontinuous Galerkin finite element setting journal May 2018
A numerical study of sequential and simultaneous hydraulic fracturing in single and multi-lateral horizontal wells journal August 2015
A growing library of three-dimensional cohesive elements for use in ABAQUS journal August 2014
A weak penalty formulation remedying traction oscillations in interface elements journal October 2016
Validity of Cubic Law for fluid flow in a deformable rock fracture journal December 1980
Fracture process zone in concrete tension specimen journal January 2000
Poro-viscoelastic modeling of production from shale gas reservoir: An adaptive dual permeability model journal September 2017
Analysis of Energy Balance When Using Cohesive Zone Models to Simulate Fracture Processes journal September 2002
Numerical modeling of hydraulic fracture problem in permeable medium using cohesive zone model journal January 2012
Analysis of Stresses and Strains Near the End of a Crack Traversing a Plate journal September 1957
A mixed interface finite element for cohesive zone models journal December 2008
A three-dimensional hydraulic fracturing simulator journal April 1989
A three-dimensional poroelastic analysis of rock failure around a hydraulic fracture journal August 2013
Three-Dimensional Poroelastic Modeling of Multiple Hydraulic Fracture Propagation from Horizontal Wells journal May 2018
Three-Dimensional Thermo-Poroelastic Modeling and Analysis of Flow, Heat Transport and Deformation in Fractured Rock with Applications to a Lab-Scale Geothermal System journal October 2019
Cohesive zone finite element-based modeling of hydraulic fractures journal October 2009
An efficient algorithm for propagating fluid-driven fractures journal October 1999
Simulation of the fracture process in rock with application to hydrofracturing journal June 1986
Propagation of a plane-strain hydraulic fracture with a fluid lag: Early-time solution journal September 2006
On the numerical integration of interface elements journal January 1993
The Mathematical Theory of Equilibrium Cracks in Brittle Fracture book January 1962
Numerical aspects of cohesive-zone models journal September 2003
Computational implementation of the PPR potential-based cohesive model in ABAQUS: Educational perspective journal October 2012
Crack blunting and the strength of soft elastic solids
  • Hui, C. -Y.; A., Jagota; Bennison, S. J.
  • Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, Vol. 459, Issue 2034 https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2002.1057
journal June 2003
3D thermo-poroelastic analysis of fracture network deformation and induced micro-seismicity in enhanced geothermal systems journal November 2015
Crack band theory for fracture of concrete journal May 1983
Cohesive Zone Models: A Critical Review of Traction-Separation Relationships Across Fracture Surfaces journal November 2011
Three dimensional finite element simulations of hydraulic fracture height growth in layered formations using a coupled hydro-mechanical model journal January 2020
Analysis of crack formation and crack growth in concrete by means of fracture mechanics and finite elements journal November 1976
Pore Pressure and Stress Distributions Around a Hydraulic Fracture in Heterogeneous Rock journal August 2017
Yielding of steel sheets containing slits journal May 1960
A scalable 3D fracture and fragmentation algorithm based on a hybrid, discontinuous Galerkin, cohesive element method journal January 2011