Open Peer Review by a Selected-Papers Network
- Univ. of California, Los Angeles, CA (United States). UCLA-DOE Inst. for Genomics and Proteomics. Dept. of Chemistry and Biochemistry; DOE/OSTI
A selected-papers (SP) network is a network in which researchers who read, write, and review articles subscribe to each other based on common interests. Instead of reviewing a manuscript in secret for the Editor of a journal, each reviewer simply publishes his review (typically of a paper he wishes to recommend) to his SP network subscribers. Once the SP network reviewers complete their review decisions, the authors can invite any journal editor they want to consider these reviews and initial audience size, and make a publication decision. Since all impact assessment, reviews, and revisions are complete, this decision process should be short. I show how the SP network can provide a new way of measuring impact, catalyze the emergence of new subfields, and accelerate discovery in existing fields, by providing each reader a fine-grained filter for high-impact. I present a three phase plan for building a basic SP network, and making it an effective peer review platform that can be used by journals, conferences, users of repositories such as arXiv, and users of search engines such as PubMed. I show how the SP network can greatly improve review and dissemination of research articles in areas that are not well-supported by existing journals. Finally, I illustrate how the SP network concept can work well with existing publication services such as journals, conferences, arXiv, PubMed, and online citation management sites.
- Research Organization:
- Univ. of California, Los Angeles, CA (United States)
- Sponsoring Organization:
- USDOE Office of Science (SC)
- Grant/Contract Number:
- FC02-02ER63421
- OSTI ID:
- 1628197
- Journal Information:
- Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, Journal Name: Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience Vol. 6; ISSN 1662-5188
- Publisher:
- Frontiers Research FoundationCopyright Statement
- Country of Publication:
- United States
- Language:
- English
Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again
|
journal | June 1982 |
Open Citation Linking
|
journal | October 2002 |
A note on the Treatment of Squint
|
journal | January 1922 |
Alternatives to Peer Review: Novel Approaches for Research Evaluation
|
journal | January 2011 |
Similar Records
Thank You to Our 2018 Peer Reviewers
The role of peer review and science for advancing public understanding