Skip to main content
U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Atomic Bomb Survivors Life-Span Study: Insufficient Statistical Power to Select Radiation Carcinogenesis Model

Journal Article · · Dose-Response
 [1];  [2]
  1. Falcon Analytics, Karney Shomron (Israel); DOE/OSTI
  2. National Center for Nuclear Research, Swierk (Poland)

The atomic bomb survivors life-span study (LSS) is often claimed to support the linear no-threshold hypothesis (LNTH) of radiation carcinogenesis. This paper shows that this claim is baseless. The LSS data are equally or better described by an s-shaped dependence on radiation exposure with a threshold of about 0.3 Sievert (Sv) and saturation level at about 1.5 Sv. A Monte-Carlo simulation of possible LSS outcomes demonstrates that, given the weak statistical power, LSS cannot provide support for LNTH. Even if the LNTH is used at low dose and dose rates, its estimation of excess cancer mortality should be communicated as 2.5% per Sv, i.e., an increase of cancer mortality from about 20% spontaneous mortality to about 22.5% per Sv, which is about half of the usually cited value. The impact of the “neutron discrepancy problem” – the apparent difference between the calculated and measured values of neutron flux in Hiroshima – was studied and found to be marginal. Major revision of the radiation risk assessment paradigm is required.

Research Organization:
National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC (United States)
Sponsoring Organization:
USDOE Office of Environment, Health, Safety and Security (AU)
Grant/Contract Number:
HS0000031
OSTI ID:
1628015
Journal Information:
Dose-Response, Journal Name: Dose-Response Journal Issue: -1 Vol. 1; ISSN 1559-3258; ISSN HORMDR
Publisher:
International Hormesis SocietyCopyright Statement
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

References (13)

The dose-response for x-ray induction of myeloid leukaemia in male CBA/H mice journal February 1983
Radiation Risk and Ethics journal September 1999
Responses to Low Doses of Ionizing Radiation in Biological Systems journal July 2004
Cancer risk at low doses of ionizing radiation: artificial neural networks inference from atomic bomb survivors journal December 2013
Some Nonscientific Influences on Radiation Protection Standards and Practice the 1980 Sievert Lecture* journal January 1980
The Linear No-Threshold Relationship Is Inconsistent with Radiation Biologic and Experimental Data journal April 2009
The paradigm that failed journal January 2008
Studies of the Mortality of Atomic Bomb Survivors, Report 14, 1950–2003: An Overview of Cancer and Noncancer Diseases journal March 2012
Studies of Mortality of Atomic Bomb Survivors. Report 13: Solid Cancer and Noncancer Disease Mortality: 1950–1997 journal October 2003
A Stochastic Markov Model of Cellular Response to Radiation journal July 2011
Evidence Supporting Radiation Hormesis in Atomic Bomb Survivor Cancer Mortality Data journal July 2012
Commentary: Ethical Issues of Current Health-Protection Policies on Low-Dose Ionizing Radiation journal November 2013
Changes in Atomic Bomb Survivors' Dosimetry with the New Dosimetry System DS02 journal January 2006

Cited By (2)

Current Evidence for Developmental, Structural, and Functional Brain Defects following Prenatal Radiation Exposure journal January 2016
Reforming the debate around radiation risk journal May 2019