Liquid layers in clouds affect their microphysical processes, as well as the surface energy budget. Studies focusing on these and other areas of research are often in need of skillful estimation of liquid-bearing cloud layer boundaries. The bases of these layers are predominantly determined by ground-based lidar instruments. Most studies requiring liquid cloud base height (LCBH) information use either fixed lidar parameter (depolarization and/or backscatter cross-section) thresholds or cloud base height data products that do not distinguish between ice and liquid, all of which might introduce inconsistencies and errors in the resolved LCBH. In this paper, two explicit LCBH detection algorithms are presented. The first algorithm uses the high spectral resolution lidar (HSRL) data. Examination of this algorithm in multiple cases and scenarios during numerous days, and first-order comparison with microwave-radiometer data show satisfactory results. The second algorithm incorporates widely-available micropulse lidar (MPL) data for the LCBH detection. A 1-year long comparison of data gathered at Barrow, Alaska, and McMurdo Station, Antarctica, which includes other cloud base detection methodologies (ceilometer, MPL value-added product cloud base height, LCBHs detected using a fixed MPL depolarization threshold) emphasize the merits of the presented MPL algorithm. Examination of several unusual LCBH configurations suggests that the current practice of operating lidar at a tilting angle of 4 degrees off zenith may not be sufficient to avoid specular reflection from oriented ice crystals. Data collected at Madison Wisconsin is used to show that specular reflection may impact measurements even at 4 degrees.
Silber, Israel, et al. "Polar liquid cloud base detection algorithms for high spectral resolution or micropulse lidar data." Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, vol. 123, no. 8, Apr. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1029/2017JD027840
Silber, Israel, Verlinde, J., Eloranta, E. W., Flynn, Connor J M., & Flynn, Donna M. (2018). Polar liquid cloud base detection algorithms for high spectral resolution or micropulse lidar data. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 123(8). https://doi.org/10.1029/2017JD027840
Silber, Israel, Verlinde, J., Eloranta, E. W., et al., "Polar liquid cloud base detection algorithms for high spectral resolution or micropulse lidar data," Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres 123, no. 8 (2018), https://doi.org/10.1029/2017JD027840
@article{osti_1607888,
author = {Silber, Israel and Verlinde, J. and Eloranta, E. W. and Flynn, Connor J M. and Flynn, Donna M.},
title = {Polar liquid cloud base detection algorithms for high spectral resolution or micropulse lidar data},
annote = {Liquid layers in clouds affect their microphysical processes, as well as the surface energy budget. Studies focusing on these and other areas of research are often in need of skillful estimation of liquid-bearing cloud layer boundaries. The bases of these layers are predominantly determined by ground-based lidar instruments. Most studies requiring liquid cloud base height (LCBH) information use either fixed lidar parameter (depolarization and/or backscatter cross-section) thresholds or cloud base height data products that do not distinguish between ice and liquid, all of which might introduce inconsistencies and errors in the resolved LCBH. In this paper, two explicit LCBH detection algorithms are presented. The first algorithm uses the high spectral resolution lidar (HSRL) data. Examination of this algorithm in multiple cases and scenarios during numerous days, and first-order comparison with microwave-radiometer data show satisfactory results. The second algorithm incorporates widely-available micropulse lidar (MPL) data for the LCBH detection. A 1-year long comparison of data gathered at Barrow, Alaska, and McMurdo Station, Antarctica, which includes other cloud base detection methodologies (ceilometer, MPL value-added product cloud base height, LCBHs detected using a fixed MPL depolarization threshold) emphasize the merits of the presented MPL algorithm. Examination of several unusual LCBH configurations suggests that the current practice of operating lidar at a tilting angle of 4 degrees off zenith may not be sufficient to avoid specular reflection from oriented ice crystals. Data collected at Madison Wisconsin is used to show that specular reflection may impact measurements even at 4 degrees.},
doi = {10.1029/2017JD027840},
url = {https://www.osti.gov/biblio/1607888},
journal = {Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres},
number = {8},
volume = {123},
place = {United States},
year = {2018},
month = {04}}
Welton, Ellsworth J.; Campbell, James R.; Spinhirne, James D.
Second International Asia-Pacific Symposium on Remote Sensing of the Atmosphere, Environment, and Space, SPIE Proceedingshttps://doi.org/10.1117/12.417040